deweyzeph
Honorary Master
Agreed. There was zero incentive to purchase anything higher than 50MB. In fact, you would have been stupid to.
Its the non-use of purchased bundles that is the cash cow.
Spot on.
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Agreed. There was zero incentive to purchase anything higher than 50MB. In fact, you would have been stupid to.
Its the non-use of purchased bundles that is the cash cow.
Agreed. There was zero incentive to purchase anything higher than 50MB. In fact, you would have been stupid to.
Its the non-use of purchased bundles that is the cash cow.
Spot on.
OOB usage is very low, the vast majority of users do not consume their bundles fully. So it's not about OOB, rather it's to entice Cell C subs to buy bigger bundles, up from 50MB.
Seen ^this in almost every network related thread...Waiting for my contract to end... two months to go.
OOB usage is very low, the vast majority of users do not consume their bundles fully. So it's not about OOB, rather it's to entice Cell C subs to buy bigger bundles, up from 50MB.
You've seen the answer to this posted numerous times here. In direct reply to your own question. Saw PH recently explain it to you as well. As did Cell C, effectively. Asking the same question over and over again won't change the underlying dynamics. As Einstein once pointed out.If this is the case, the amount of data used OOB can easily be set off against unused IB data. Why then still charge ridiculous OOB rates and not keep it the same as IB rates?
You've seen the answer to this posted numerous times here. In direct reply to your own question. Saw PH recently explain it to you as well. As did Cell C, effectively. Asking the same question over and over again won't change the underlying dynamics. As Einstein once pointed out.