Will Malema apologise?

Only issue is that Zille is not a child and doesnt behave like one.
By responding to Malema's childish rhetoric, she has stooped to his level. End of argument. They both need a good hiding. I would give Helen one just for lying so often.
 
By responding to Malema's childish rhetoric, she has stooped to his level. End of argument. They both need a good hiding. I would give Helen one just for lying so often.

Ignore a fool and he'll go away. Bait a fool and you make him look even foolish. Politics is chess and she's going for checkmate ;)
 
Who threatened her? link?
Your wonderful ANC buddies & supporters... who else?
http://www.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=1&click_id=3011&art_id=qw114764130653B253

The ANC has failed to take action against the ANCYL leaders who had labelled Zuma's accuser as "Lucifer". It has also failed to investigate the behaviour of Zuma's supporters who chanted "Burn the bitch" during the trial.

Maybe you will read or look it up next time... but hey... you don't normally put links yourself huh?

So Sakkiboy... next time do your own homework... and take your fingers out of your ears... and remove the blinkers while you're at it :rolleyes:
 
Your wonderful ANC buddies & supporters... who else?


Maybe you will read or look it up next time... but hey... you don't normally put links yourself huh?

So Sakkiboy... next time do your own homework... and take your fingers out of your ears... and remove the blinkers while you're at it :rolleyes:
Let's just clear this up without the usual vulgar ad homs. Just because I ask for a link, doesn't necessarily mean I disagree with what you wrote. Usually it's for clarity and to avoid a highly subjective interpretation (regular). You've jumped to a conclusion, and not for the first time. I vehemently disapprove of what happened.
 
Let's just clear this up without the usual vulgar ad homs. Just because I ask for a link, doesn't necessarily mean I disagree with what you wrote. Usually it's for clarity and to avoid a highly subjective interpretation (regular). You've jumped to a conclusion, and not for the first time. I vehemently disapprove of what happened.

Thats a surprise.. but welcomed... criticism 'n all :rolleyes:
 
Let's just clear this up without the usual vulgar ad homs. Just because I ask for a link, doesn't necessarily mean I disagree with what you wrote. Usually it's for clarity and to avoid a highly subjective interpretation (regular). You've jumped to a conclusion, and not for the first time. I vehemently disapprove of what happened.

Can't you just read it on page 14 of the newspaper, I know you're really thorough with your daily publications? :confused:
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X