Windows 7 eleven second boot time?

Random717

Expert Member
Joined
May 30, 2006
Messages
2,121
Reaction score
24
http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,2845,2352374,00.asp
One of those surprises was delivered Wednesday, when Microsoft paired a quad-core Intel Core i7 microprocessor with a solid-state-disc drive and what Ruston Panabaker, the principal program manager for strategic silicon partnering at Microsoft, called a generic build of Windows 7. Panabaker fired up the system, and presto! An 11-second boot time.

Sure, this was most likely a fresh build on fresh hardware, and an SSD makes all the difference in the world. But there was a little magic going on behind the scenes, as well

According to Panabaker, the boot process can be parallelized across all four cores and all eight threads provided by Intel's hyperthreaded processor. "It's an Intel reference design," Panabaker said. "But with high-performance hardware, this shows what system manufacturers can do."

Part of the improved performance comes from the telemetry data that helped Microsoft boost battery life by a significant amount when running on Intel's next-generation processors. Other work was done by Microsoft itself, removing "thread locks" that stalled the system. Intel also works with the Windows 7 scheduler to migrate threads to idle cores, and then to shut those idle cores down if there truly is no work to do.

Microsoft has been working with the software ecosystem to take advantage of the battery-boosting, low-power API. And Intel executives, like others in the industry, have reported that Microsoft has been diligent about providing its partners time (about 12 months) to nail down drivers and the like.

Panabaker did say that there will likely be a Knowledge Base article listing incompatible hardware, as Apple's Snow Leopard does. When that will be released is not known, but it will likely be closer to launch, he said. One feature that Microsoft plans to include: community features, which will help users and Microsoft nail down what doesn't work, he said.

Anyone here managed to replicate that?

And good news about allowing greater community input...
 
Well i have an ssd and windows 7, how exactly do you test how fast it boots?

I mean should i time it from when i press the power button? Should i time it from when the first boot screen disappears?

All i know is my pc boots from the time i restart to back into windows in around 35 seconds.
 
What I don't get is why people are so hung up about boot times! Are we so caught up in the rat-race that we need our PCs to be instant on? Come on!
 
What I don't get is why people are so hung up about boot times! Are we so caught up in the rat-race that we need our PCs to be instant on? Come on!

Unfortunately people are in a rat-race. I work with end users every day and they will always complain that their pc's are slow. You can give them a brand new pc and after a few weeks they will complain it's slow.

They would switch the pc on and click on Word even before windows finished starting up. Now any application would load a few seconds slower with the initial start up and then the user complains. ahh I just want to hit them over the head with their keyboard.
 
Win XP boots in about 16 sec for me - from the time the WinXP logo appears to the time it's usable. The "Press F2 to enter BIOS" delay is about 2-3 sec.

Test platform: 1.86GHz Atom CPU, Toshiba THNS064GG2BNAA SSD, 1GB DDR2 RAM.
 
What I don't get is why people are so hung up about boot times! Are we so caught up in the rat-race that we need our PCs to be instant on? Come on!

People see computers as appliances. You don't wait 60 seconds after you turn on your TV to see the picture, ne?
 
Well i have an ssd and windows 7, how exactly do you test how fast it boots?

I mean should i time it from when i press the power button? Should i time it from when the first boot screen disappears?

All i know is my pc boots from the time i restart to back into windows in around 35 seconds.

I time it from pushing the power button... I'm guessing they turned off all BIOS tests and unplugged/disabled everything but the HDD and GPU.

What I don't get is why people are so hung up about boot times! Are we so caught up in the rat-race that we need our PCs to be instant on? Come on!

Some of us have low concentration spans... needing to restart a computer and waiting a minute for it to shut down and reboot so something can install is enough time to forget about that important task for the rest of the day. :o

Reminds me of one XP system I used that took 4 minutes for the networking to come up after booting. Never got any work done on it; started playing Freecell while waiting, next thing an hour's gone by...
 
My Vista laptop became a speed demon after I popped in that WD 7200rpm hard drive....think I'm faster. :)
 
Heres a little bit for you...

Most of the high-end netbooks on the market atm can boot vista in 10 seconds.
 
Heres a little bit for you...

Most of the high-end netbooks on the market atm can boot vista in 10 seconds.

I don't believe it. Perhaps it seems like 10 sec but is >30sec in reality - you should measure it first.

I have the highest end netbook available at the moment (1.86GHz Intel Atom -- ok a 2.0GHz Atom also exsits) and Windows loads in about 16 sec - on a Toshiba SSD.
 
I tested the high-end model (yes, tested, not just guessed) when i was working at Incredible Connection.

Also SSD drive, i THINK it was the 2GHz, fresh install (clean windows, not the bloatware Acer spreads around).
Booted in a touch under 10 seconds.
I might note however that this is a clean install, no antivirus, no additional drivers... nada, just clean. Dont think we even had SP1 on it...
 
I tested the high-end model (yes, tested, not just guessed) when i was working at Incredible Connection.

Also SSD drive, i THINK it was the 2GHz, fresh install (clean windows, not the bloatware Acer spreads around).
Booted in a touch under 10 seconds.
I might note however that this is a clean install, no antivirus, no additional drivers... nada, just clean. Dont think we even had SP1 on it...

Did you time it?

AFAIC IC does not have 2 GHz models (on sale) and they're (Acer) not putting in good quality SSDs into Acers.
 
If you mean time by "down to the last nanosecond with a stopwatch"... no.

Just with a normal ticky-tock clock hanging from the wall.
Hence the absence of "9.8111716254758 seconds" type reading.
 
MS may boast a fast boot time, but I regard it as a load of cr@p. Sure, it can boot quickly with no software on, but the moment you load it to a properly usable state, and use it for a couple of months, the boot time will at least triple in my experience.

As an analogy, I'm sure I could get a one megabyte distro of linux to boot in about one second, but that wouldn't help me as I wouldn't be able to do anything with it. I could still claim though, that Linux boots in one second.
 
Actually tassidar windows 7 does not seem to slow down, i have tons of apps and games installed and my boot time is exactly what it is was when i first loaded windows 7, windows 7 in my opinion does not get slower with time and programs like xp.

I was thinking though that maybe the slow down is linked to the 7200rpm drives and maybe ssd's don't suffer the same fate, i have been using an ssd for vista and windows 7 and never noticed a slow down on either OS.
 
Actually tassidar windows 7 does not seem to slow down, i have tons of apps and games installed and my boot time is exactly what it is was when i first loaded windows 7, windows 7 in my opinion does not get slower with time and programs like xp.

I was thinking though that maybe the slow down is linked to the 7200rpm drives and maybe ssd's don't suffer the same fate, i have been using an ssd for vista and windows 7 and never noticed a slow down on either OS.

I confess that I have yet to test Windows 7, though I remain cynical, as AFAIK, it still uses the same registry and dll system. I stand to be corrected, though.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X