Woolworths SA refuses to back down from supporting Pride Month

To you. But as an observer, it's amazing how the bible has 1000s of different messages to suit 1000s of different viewpoints. It's almost like one can tailor it to suit your own prejudices.
the people like you love to interpret the scriptures as you want. that is why you have that conclusion.
 
The bible doesn't have problems with basic biology though.

You think?


Go and ask a "science loving" progressive activist what a woman is and you will get a 10 minute TED talk about how biological sex is an expression of the white-heterosexual patriarchy.

Seems to me that god had one job writing a book for his followers and he seriously messed it up.
 
Talking out of your arse again. What does science have to do with "white-heterosexual patriarchy"
Good question.

It has absolutely nothing to do with the " white-heterosexual patriarchy". But try telling a progressive activist that, you will get something that resembles below:
 
Good question.

It has absolutely nothing to do with the " white-heterosexual patriarchy". But try telling a progressive activist that, you will get something that resembles below:
One person's opinion does not make it so.
 
the people like you love to interpret the scriptures as you want. that is why you have that conclusion.

I have no thoughts either way on a book with no provenance written by men who never met the subject of the book.

I'm talking about Christians, such as you who follow the book and believe it to be gods word. There are 1000s of different interpretations depending on how you view life and simply alter to suit.

You're gay? Hey, no problem the bible says this!

You hate gays, hey no problem the bible says this!
 
I have no thoughts either way on a book with no provenance written by men who never met the subject of the book.

I'm talking about Christians, such as you who follow the book and believe it to be gods word. There are 1000s of different interpretations depending on how you view life and simply alter to suit.

You're gay? Hey, no problem the bible says this!

You hate gays, hey no problem the bible says this!

I said that already, that is no such thing ==> "1000s of different interpretations", but we have people like you ==>
"interpret bible as you want."

the problem is not "bible", is you. got it?
 
In what way are homosexuals, etc. supposed to be grooming children? Cross-dressing and risqué humour have long been an integral part of theatre. They're standard in pantomimes. This goes back hundreds of years. That means it should be viewed as old and traditional, and therefore loved by conservatives.
 
Yeah that's just ignorance on your part. Christians got together long ago in the year 325 to sort this out. So for the last 1700 years we have all agreed on what the Bible says.

Lol, open you eyes fella, there are millions for women priests, millions against it, millions for homosexual marriage, millions against it, millions believing bread is the body of Christ, millions who don't. No man, you are just proving my point about moulding the bible to suit your own views and prejudices.

I mean, do for your example include the Westboro Baptist church in this "we"?
 
I have no thoughts either way on a book with no provenance written by men who never met the subject of the book.

I'm talking about Christians, such as you who follow the book and believe it to be gods word. There are 1000s of different interpretations depending on how you view life and simply alter to suit.

You're gay? Hey, no problem the bible says this!

You hate gays, hey no problem the bible says this!
Lol you are lying to yourself as here you are expressing those non-thoughts. I actually almost argee with you.
 
I said that already, that is no such thing ==> "1000s of different interpretations", but we have people like you ==>
"interpret bible as you want."

the problem is not "bible", is you. got it?

By observing and commenting? Dude, I have no idea what the bible says or doesn't. Got it?
 
In what way are homosexuals, etc. supposed to be grooming children? Cross-dressing and risqué humour have long been an integral part of theatre. They're standard in pantomimes. This goes back hundreds of years. That means it should be viewed as old and traditional, and therefore loved by conservatives.
Strawman. Conservative love theatre. In the modern day woman can also act in theatre plays so there is less of a need to cross dress but you can if you want. You can even do adult shows for adults.

The only problem is displaying adult content to kids.
 
In what way are homosexuals, etc. supposed to be grooming children? Cross-dressing and risqué humour have long been an integral part of theatre. They're standard in pantomimes. This goes back hundreds of years. That means it should be viewed as old and traditional, and therefore loved by conservatives.
Because it's easier to blame them. As they are still being included in society. It's just a way to take the heat of off themselves...
 
Lol you are lying to yourself as here you are expressing those non-thoughts. I actually almost argee with you.

That's a bit of a weak dodge.

I have no thoughts on the interpretations of the bible because I don't know what it in it. Surely that's not too hard to understand?

My comments are on the many, wide and varying interpretations that one sees by Christians justifying their personal beliefs and all relating to the same book.

Try being honest for a second and comment on the subject.
 
I have no thoughts either way on a book with no provenance written by men who never met the subject of the book.

I'm talking about Christians, such as you who follow the book and believe it to be gods word. There are 1000s of different interpretations depending on how you view life and simply alter to suit.

You're gay? Hey, no problem the bible says this!

You hate gays, hey no problem the bible says this!
The better way to view the Bible is to look at it archetypically. What are the stories in the various books, what are the characters doing in the books and what example do they set with their experiences. That type of analysis is much more useful than quoting random pieces of Torah law written 2000 years ago. If you want to understand the book as Christians do, that is probably your best shot as an atheist.

And it would be incorrect to say that every single story has 1000 different interpretations. For example, I do not really see how many interpretations of the parable of the Good Samaritan you can really get out of it.
 
So you're saying God allowed the muslims to win, caused the death of Ukrainian women and children, and sent a virus that killed mainly the old and the weak, and did nothing to punish the gays who pissed him off?

Does that sound even vaguely rational?
At least in Afghanistan maybe he was trying to send a message to the United States. Perhaps he's tired of those clowns running around claiming he's on their side. The plague, well that could have been an attempt to get rid of some old conservatives. The war was started by a religious ultra-conservative, Putin, but his forces don't appear to be doing too well.

The school sex education thing we know is just hyperbole. These are after all the same people who usually lie about being banned from praying at school.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X