Enby Panda
Expert Member
Talking out of your arse again. What does science have to do with "white-heterosexual patriarchy"a 10 minute TED talk about how biological sex is an expression of the white-heterosexual patriarchy.
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Talking out of your arse again. What does science have to do with "white-heterosexual patriarchy"a 10 minute TED talk about how biological sex is an expression of the white-heterosexual patriarchy.
the people like you love to interpret the scriptures as you want. that is why you have that conclusion.To you. But as an observer, it's amazing how the bible has 1000s of different messages to suit 1000s of different viewpoints. It's almost like one can tailor it to suit your own prejudices.
The bible doesn't have problems with basic biology though.
Go and ask a "science loving" progressive activist what a woman is and you will get a 10 minute TED talk about how biological sex is an expression of the white-heterosexual patriarchy.
Good question.Talking out of your arse again. What does science have to do with "white-heterosexual patriarchy"
One person's opinion does not make it so.Good question.
It has absolutely nothing to do with the " white-heterosexual patriarchy". But try telling a progressive activist that, you will get something that resembles below:
Lol.You think?
![]()
QueerTheology.com | Resources for LGBTQ+ Christians and Supporters - Queer Theology
Queerness is already sacred we want to show you how After 10 years as the longest running LGBTQ+ spirituality podcast, […]www.queertheology.com
Well it seemed to work fairly wellSeems to me that god had one job writing a book for his followers and he seriously messed it up.
the people like you love to interpret the scriptures as you want. that is why you have that conclusion.
but you have bunches of such persons ......One person's opinion does not make it so.
Lol.
Well it seemed to work fairly well
I have no thoughts either way on a book with no provenance written by men who never met the subject of the book.
I'm talking about Christians, such as you who follow the book and believe it to be gods word. There are 1000s of different interpretations depending on how you view life and simply alter to suit.
You're gay? Hey, no problem the bible says this!
You hate gays, hey no problem the bible says this!
Yeah that's just ignorance on your part. Christians got together long ago in the year 325 to sort this out. So for the last 1700 years we have all agreed on what the Bible says.
Lol you are lying to yourself as here you are expressing those non-thoughts. I actually almost argee with you.I have no thoughts either way on a book with no provenance written by men who never met the subject of the book.
I'm talking about Christians, such as you who follow the book and believe it to be gods word. There are 1000s of different interpretations depending on how you view life and simply alter to suit.
You're gay? Hey, no problem the bible says this!
You hate gays, hey no problem the bible says this!
I said that already, that is no such thing ==> "1000s of different interpretations", but we have people like you ==>
"interpret bible as you want."
the problem is not "bible", is you. got it?
Strawman. Conservative love theatre. In the modern day woman can also act in theatre plays so there is less of a need to cross dress but you can if you want. You can even do adult shows for adults.In what way are homosexuals, etc. supposed to be grooming children? Cross-dressing and risqué humour have long been an integral part of theatre. They're standard in pantomimes. This goes back hundreds of years. That means it should be viewed as old and traditional, and therefore loved by conservatives.
Because it's easier to blame them. As they are still being included in society. It's just a way to take the heat of off themselves...In what way are homosexuals, etc. supposed to be grooming children? Cross-dressing and risqué humour have long been an integral part of theatre. They're standard in pantomimes. This goes back hundreds of years. That means it should be viewed as old and traditional, and therefore loved by conservatives.
Lol you are lying to yourself as here you are expressing those non-thoughts. I actually almost argee with you.
The better way to view the Bible is to look at it archetypically. What are the stories in the various books, what are the characters doing in the books and what example do they set with their experiences. That type of analysis is much more useful than quoting random pieces of Torah law written 2000 years ago. If you want to understand the book as Christians do, that is probably your best shot as an atheist.I have no thoughts either way on a book with no provenance written by men who never met the subject of the book.
I'm talking about Christians, such as you who follow the book and believe it to be gods word. There are 1000s of different interpretations depending on how you view life and simply alter to suit.
You're gay? Hey, no problem the bible says this!
You hate gays, hey no problem the bible says this!
At least in Afghanistan maybe he was trying to send a message to the United States. Perhaps he's tired of those clowns running around claiming he's on their side. The plague, well that could have been an attempt to get rid of some old conservatives. The war was started by a religious ultra-conservative, Putin, but his forces don't appear to be doing too well.So you're saying God allowed the muslims to win, caused the death of Ukrainian women and children, and sent a virus that killed mainly the old and the weak, and did nothing to punish the gays who pissed him off?
Does that sound even vaguely rational?