Workers' Right to Strike is not Absolute - Ramaphosa

rvZA

Honorary Master
Joined
Jan 3, 2021
Messages
25,277
Reaction score
25,153
President Cyril Ramaphosa said that workers had the right to strike but that right was not "absolute".

He also said that he was concerned by the violent nature of the current Nehawu strike.


 
So put your money where your mouth is. Ban unions. Change the labour laws to Apartheid labour laws. Do away with AA and BEE. Fix the economy.
 
Come on Ciryl that’s not what you said in the 80s.
 
So call an emergency session of Parliament to ammend the LRA to allow any employer to instant fire workers who commit criminal acts on the their premesis.
 
Ramaposer can stfu. Where was he when Mama Winnie liberated us with her matches and tyres?
 
"We are all concerned about the violent nature of the strike that is under way. Workers in our country have the right to freedom of association, they also have the right to strike, but that right is not absolute. It’s not absolute because there are certain workers who are in essential services."

Essentially, he is in the view that essential services must be on a leash. I hope that he knows that being the president is essential too. I posted his whole speech in the NEHAWU thread.

All his speech ends up doing is being, indecisive, NEHAWU already told him to go phala phala. As I said, what happens now?

There is still a good chance that the government will compromise which will practically result in the strike being essential to achieving their demands. Either the government settles or it continues throughout next week, and more unions will rally throughout the coming week running up to what is expected to be an explosive 20th. Absolute is all perspective.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X