Zuma appoints new judges

Few questions:



1. How can she throw out the FF+ e-toll case, without hearing them on day 1?
2. How can she state this: “The matter is scrapped from the roll for lack of urgency,” said Judge Maria Jansen.

This is and should only be applicable to the ANC which is in a manner our only constitutional issue... and the EFF:



So the case was not heard, seems she had a motive.
ties into the post 1 up:
the court has to grant leave to proceed on the urgency rule before hearing the merits. The failure to convince the court of urgency would have the matter struck from the roll. That is what happened. She heard them on day 1 on the matter of the urgency.

The application was not however dismissed.
 
Paul, correct me if I am wrong please but doesnt one HAVE to be an Advocate to become a Judge?

I read that one of these women is a Magistrate but not an advocate so I am confused

A bit late to the discussion?
 
Paul, correct me if I am wrong please but doesnt one HAVE to be an Advocate to become a Judge?

I read that one of these women is a Magistrate but not an advocate so I am confused

a magistrate presides over the lower courts (magistrates & regional), judges preside over the higher courts (high court, appeal etc).
 
Erm yes.. Stating the obvious thanks.. I'll wait for Paul

you were mixing up judges & magistrates in your post (#22). ie- a magistrate not being an advocate.
judges are appointed by the president in consultation with jsc.

the requirement:
"Any appropriately qualified woman or man, who is a fit and proper person"

but here:
The Constitution’s specified qualifications are “[a]ny appropriately qualified woman or man who is a fit and proper person.” There is the additional qualification of citizenship for Constitutional Court judges.12

The stated qualifications both invite and exclude. They implicitly invite attorneys, magistrates and academics to apply. Previously almost all judges were selected from among advocates who, like English barristers, are the legal profession’s litigators. The selections were usually from among the advocates with years of experience—advocates who had taken “silk”; i.e., the senior counsels with SC appended to their names. Under the New Democracy Constitution, attorneys, magistrates and academics have been considered and have been appointed. Three of the judges appearing or featured in Courting Justice reflect the new standards— Constitutional Court Justices Kate O’Reagan and Yvonne Mokgoro were both law professors before their appointments; and Judge Tandazwa Ndita was a magistrate.
 
Sorry I read my post and the 2nd part was typed incorrectly.. What I mean is.. Can someone be appointed as a Judge Without being an Advocate first?

Yes. You can be an attorney, advocate or even an academic. Certain of the Constitutional Court Judges are/were academics.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X