Zuma sidesteps 'state capture' questions from MPs

schumi

Honorary Master
Joined
Mar 26, 2010
Messages
25,095
Reaction score
2,032
Location
Durban
Cape Town - President Jacob Zuma has declined to answer written questions from MPs around the findings in former Public Protector Thuli Madonsela's State of Capture report.

In parliamentary replies released on Monday, Zuma gave a standard answer to 10 different questions from opposition MPs regarding his relationship with the Gupta family.

Zuma said the questions formed part of the subject matter of Madonsela's report into alleged "state capture", and he is still studying its contents.

Report inconclusive

"It is clear from the remedial action to be taken that the report is inconclusive," the reply read.

"After the report was released, I have since indicated that I am giving consideration to the contents of the report in order to ascertain whether it should be a subject of a court challenge.

"I therefore cannot answer these questions as they form part of the said report."

DA leader Mmusi Maimane wanted to know what Zuma's relationship with the Gupta family was, on which dates he had visited the family at their Saxonwold residence and if the family had ever given him a gift.

Cope MP Deidre Carter wanted to know if Zuma or any members of his family had ever received payments from a certain businessmen, and if so, what the reasons were.

DA MP chief whip John Steenhuisen wanted to know if there was any undue influence in favour of the Gupta-owned The New Age newspaper on the president's part, and whether he was present at the family's Saxonwold residence when former MP Vytjie Mentor said she was allegedly offered a Cabinet position while there.

Nkandla home loan

To a question on his loan to pay back a portion of the money spent on upgrades at his Nkandla homestead, Zuma said he raised the R7.8m through VBS Mutual Bank on its standard terms.

"VBS Mutual Bank is one of the few financial institutions which offer home loans in respect of land owned by traditional authorities," he said in reply to DA MP Tandeka Gqada.

He also said that after paying over the amount of R7 814 155 to the South African Reserve Bank, as a matter of courtesy, he advised the Constitutional Court that he paid the amount.

"I deem such notification sufficient and compliant with both the order of court and of my constitutional obligations."

News24
http://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/News/zuma-sidesteps-state-capture-questions-from-mps-20161114
 
That's not a sidestep btw, sidestepping implies some form of skill was employed, this idiot just refuses to answer and sticks his head back in the ground hoping it will blow over ...
 
Questions to this arsehole should never be written. It gives his team time to draw up his responses. He needs to be put on the spot and answer for himself under oath. I can't wait for the judicial inquiry, just to see that...
 
Questions to this arsehole should never be written. It gives his team time to draw up his responses. He needs to be put on the spot and answer for himself under oath. I can't wait for the judicial inquiry, just to see that...

I think oral questions are done for the year, only happen again next year after parly opens.
 
Questions to this arsehole should never be written. It gives his team time to draw up his responses. He needs to be put on the spot and answer for himself under oath. I can't wait for the judicial inquiry, just to see that...

We will not see the judicial inquiry for a while yet. The ANC and Zuma cannot afford to have a completely independent person heading it, so they'll be forced to first seek clarification on whether the PP can force Zuma to cede his powers to the Chief Justice. This is actually an interest case, as you'd think the law makes provision for just such a case, I mean who appoints the judge when it is Zuma who is being investigated?
 
We will not see the judicial inquiry for a while yet. The ANC and Zuma cannot afford to have a completely independent person heading it, so they'll be forced to first seek clarification on whether the PP can force Zuma to cede his powers to the Chief Justice. This is actually an interest case, as you'd think the law makes provision for just such a case, I mean who appoints the judge when it is Zuma who is being investigated?

She was clear in the wording though. The judge must be selected by the chief justice. Zuma then appoints this judge. She hasn't removed any of his powers, as he will still be the appointing authority. It's a similar process when appointing a PP - the new PP will be selected by parliament, but appointed by the president. There was an article about this a few days ago IIRC where Madonsela basically said the same. Their case about the president being player and referee will fail, as all their cases tend to do...
 
I hear you but the ANC and Zuma disagree.

Anyway, I was staying at a place where only Gupta TV was the only news channel available over the weekend and Gupta TV are running a series "dissecting" the state of capture report. Yesterday, there were airing a repeat of Temba Maseko's allegations "highlighting inconsistencies". In studio they had two "independent" analyst, one was Jimmy Manyi and the other Tshepo Kgadima :D.

Now we all know who Jimmy is and how independent he is if you can even deign to call him an analyst. Tshepo on the other hand is the former chairman of PetroSA (we know how that company has been run), and he's now the chairman of some coal mining company. It is obvious that he's probably one of those benefiting from Eskom's coal sourcing policies. It was funny and cringe-worthy watching this, of the two "analysts" at least Jimmy kept something of an open mind, but this Tshepo went full on attack of Temba and the PP's report. The idiot says the report isn't even called "State Capture" but rather "State of Capture" and points to this as evidence that Thuli must not have had anything which is why she didn't name it "State Capture". Of course the talking head won't challenge him on arguing semantics or correcting him on how the PP's names her reports. As an example she called Nkandla, "Living in comfort".

Tshepo then goes on to say that he will not call the report, "a report" and then proceeds to refer to the report as "that document".
 
He also said that after paying over the amount of R7 814 155 to the South African Reserve Bank, as a matter of courtesy, he advised the Constitutional Court that he paid the amount.

SARB? Wasn't he supposed to pay National Treasury directly?
 
Questions to this arsehole should never be written. It gives his team time to draw up his responses. He needs to be put on the spot and answer for himself under oath. I can't wait for the judicial inquiry, just to see that...
+1
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X