Zuma's Watergate

Candystore

Expert Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2009
Messages
2,992
Reaction score
943
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.za/201...dent-know-and-when-did-he-know-it_a_23285529/

Here is an extract from the article:

Former Eskom chairperson Zola Tsotsi's testimony on Wednesday was breathtaking in its scope and shocking in its revelations of collusion. It was a chronological and clinical anatomical analysis of how state capture metastasises through the sick body politic.

Tsotsi, who was eventually forced out as chairperson, made extraordinary claims -- under oath -- about President Jacob Zuma's deep involvement in the state capture project; the role Dudu Myeni, the deposed chairperson of the SAA board, played; how nobody should believe Minister of Public Enterprises Lynne Brown's protestations; Salim Essa, the "fourth Gupta brother" and his machinations; and Tony Gupta's threats.

According to Tsotsi:

- Zuma called Tsotsi to enquire whether he had been in contact with Myeni, who wanted to offer advice on Eskom.

- Myeni summoned Tsotsi to the presidential residence in Durban with Zuma. When he arrived there she advised him to suspend a number of senior Eskom executives. Zuma then entered the room and joined the discussion. Tsotsi proceeded to suspend the executives.

- Shortly after his appointment as chairperson of the board, Tsotsi went to Brown's home for a meeting. When he arrived, he was greeted by Essa and Gupta. Essa later gave him a list of preferred senior appointments. Brown gave him the same list.

- Gupta threatened him, saying he is not "helping with anything", that he suspects Tsotsi is working with "uBaba's enemies" and that he will report him to "uBaba".

- Gupta also gave him a list of preferred senior appointments. He however gave a different list to Brown, who corrected him and gave him another list of names -- exactly the same as Gupta's list.

Brown's response, shortly after she took an oath before starting her testimony, was evasive and economical. She denied consulting with "anyone" in regards to her "executive functions", saying she reports to Cabinet. Brown, later during the committee's session, denied that she knew either Essa (who she referred to as "Essop") or Gupta. HuffPost SA Editor-at-Large Ferial Haffajee pointed out on Twitter: it was "a lawyer's denial". Brown's legal representative was sitting next to her the whole time.

It is, however, Zuma's presence at the extraordinary meeting in Durban after he called Tsotsi directly that opens up a new front in the war against state capture. Just like the attempt to ensnare former ANC MP Vytjie Mentor in the Guptas' rent-seeking network in Saxonwold, Zuma also appeared out of the blue after the conversation between the enabler (Myeni) and the target (Tsotsi) started. Exactly the same happened at the Guptas' home with Mentor.

"He [Zuma] requested to know what was up for discussion, whereupon Ms Myeni repeated what she had previously stated. The president then enquired if I knew who the executives are who were to be suspended, to which I responded that I would prefer that I consult the HR rules of the company to check if there is provision for recusals, rather than suspensions, to achieve the same objective," Tsotsi testified.

What business does Myeni, who herself was busy wrecking SAA, have with intervening in Eskom's business? She has absolutely no standing to order the chairperson of Eskom to a meeting, anywhere or anytime. And even less locus standi to discuss an inquiry into the parastatal or to advise who Tsotsi is supposed to suspend.

But even more worrying: how does she secure the presidential residence for such a meeting?

The answer of course: uBaba. uBaba is the one that used Myeni to pressure Eskom. And uBaba was the stick that Tony Gupta (who is rapidly emerging as one of the Guptas' prime movers) used to threaten Tsotsi with. In the end Essa -- who seems to be very close to Brown -- scored millions and millions of rands off Eskom contracts. Not to mention the sweet, sweet deal the Guptas' Tegeta got in providing Eskom with coal.

Nixon thought he could manipulate and control the Watergate investigation. But the Senate committee started digging and asking the right questions. In the end, Nixon resigned before he could be impeached.

The portfolio committee on public enterprises is similarly starting to dig and asking the right questions. Opposition MP's on Wednesday asked for subpoenas to be issued for everyone involved, including Zuma, Myeni, Essa and the Guptas.

They need to reprise Baker's Watergate question: "What did the president know? And when did he know it?"

It appears he knew all of it. All the time.
 
Last edited:
**** I hate the Zuma's and the Gupta's, the essa, myeni, all their comrades, families, friends, the whole lot. Burn them alive.
 
He's a moron, sadly in the land of the blind he is the one eyed king.
The fact that he succeeds in getting people to call him a moron/poephol, all while he carries on pillaging with little consequence, makes him anything but stupid.
 
Nothing will happen.

Sadly this is the truth...
Just like the Nkandla report, the corruption charges, the presidents keepers etc.

TIA, Oh he did something illegal but hey he's the boss neh. Heads back down and carry on like nothing happend.
 
The fact that he succeeds in getting people to call him a moron/poephol, all while he carries on pillaging with little consequence, makes him anything but stupid.

No - he has a very expensive legal team that is advising him, and a lot of money making sure that he stays in power. He is a mouth piece and puppet. These moves were made years ago. When all those that have been captured made most of the organs of state that can hold him to account toothless or ineffectual, how do we proceed? No one with any sort of authority is willing to proceed against this cretin.
 
No - he has a very expensive legal team that is advising him, and a lot of money making sure that he stays in power. He is a mouth piece and puppet. These moves were made years ago. When all those that have been captured made most of the organs of state that can hold him to account toothless or ineffectual, how do we proceed? No one with any sort of authority is willing to proceed against this cretin.
^ this

He is still a moron.
 
The fact that he succeeds in getting people to call him a moron/poephol, all while he carries on pillaging with little consequence, makes him anything but stupid.

What he did was not exactly sophisticated. Anybody can do what he did (replace enemies and surrounding himself with staunch allies) and then when asked to explain stick their fingers in his ears and go lalalalalala.

The only thing that made it all possible is the blind support which ANC voters maintained. Through thick and thin. To the point where our public institutions were left powerless. With support like that anybody can get away with anything, because the public rejected that essential protection in favor of traditional values of power distribution.
 
If he was smart, he'd be rich and there'd still be investor confidence because the theft would be hush-hush.
 
Its it really too much to hope the NEC next month will properly divide the party and cause so much fighting that it practically destroys itself opening the way for someone else to take the next elections.

This is my train of thought, usually about 30 seconds before my alarm goes off.
 
The fact that he succeeds in getting people to call him a moron/poephol, all while he carries on pillaging with little consequence, makes him anything but stupid.

Only a fool admires a fool.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X