South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Most users don't want - and cannot afford - to be exposed to rubbish/malicious apps distributed without being tested first by a trusted party.
Life requires common sense. People who do not know how to backup/restore/re-install should only download apps which have been reviewed and rated by other users.
Testing of new apps and updates before release - as done by Apple - is necessary. Geeks don't like this control but everybody else (by far the majority) prefers it (and needs it). Story: My wife recently downloaded and installed (over the air) a BlackBerry app from the net. The app was malicious and wiped her OS. For someone who's dependant on her BlackBerry - and not a geek that can restore the OS at her office this was devastating. Most users don't want - and cannot afford - to be exposed to rubbish/malicious apps distributed without being tested first by a trusted party.
The beauty of Apple is that I get for my monthly installment/subscription a person that tests all apps for me before I download/install them to make sure I get no nasty suprises. The other manufacturers leaves it up to me to protect myself from malicious/rubbish apps. On the go when I need something now the idea is not to go look for reviews somewhere on some website first or phone a buddy who might have used the app before. Face it ... Apple's got this right. Other manufacturers sells devices, not solutions.
If you get an exe in the mail and you open it shame on you...you're an idiot, please return your smartphone![]()
Haha exactly. Not all of us need a company to look after us as if we're their 5-year-old child
Some more checks on the Marketplace would be good I suppose, as long as it's not stopping us from installing apps from elsewhere. I don't want to be told I can't install an app because some 'important' guy like Steve Jobs doesn't want me to.