Agency and Intentionality in Nature

Phronesis

Expert Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2008
Messages
3,675
Reaction score
0
The purpose of this thread is to discuss the various examples of how organisms are able to intentionally lay out a plan to manipulate their environment as a means to an end.
Definition of agency:
  • Agency is the ability to intentionally manipulate information for a purpose.
  • The manipulation of information represents the intentions of an agent.
  • The reason for the manipulation of information serves as the purpose of an agent to represent himself.
  • An agent is not a passive spectator of unfolding actions, but the author thereof.
For example, an agent wants to get out of a room that has a door. Unlocking and opening of the door is intentionally done to exit a room. An agent has actively manipulated the lock and door handle and pulled on it to open it for the purpose of intentionally getting on the other side of it. The agent also closes the door and locks it in order to leave it as it was found. Thus, the opening, unlocking and closing and locking of the door is a representation of the intentions of the natural agent and cannot be explained by chance and natural laws operative in that environment.

Predatory bacterial swarm uses rippling motion to reach prey
Like something from a horror movie, the swarm of bacteria ripples purposefully toward their prey, devours it and moves on.

Scientists at the University of Iowa are studying this behavior in Myxococcus xanthus (M. xanthus), a bacterium usually found in soil, which preys on other bacteria.

Despite its deadly role in the bacterial world, M. xanthus is harmless to humans and might one day be used beneficially to destroy harmful bacteria on surfaces or in human infections, said John Kirby, Ph.D., associate professor of microbiology in the UI Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine.

"It may be that we can modify this predator-prey relationship or apply it to medically relevant situations," Kirby said. "It would be amazing if we could adapt its predatory ability to get rid of harmful bacteria that reside in places we don't want them, including in hospitals or on medical implants".

M. xanthus lives in a multi-cellular unit that can change its structure and behavior in response to changing availability of prey.

This adaptive ability to control movement in response to an environmental stimulus is called chemotaxis, and the research team coined the term predataxis to describe M. xanthus behavior in response to prey.

In earlier studies, Kirby and James Berleman, Ph.D., a postdoctoral fellow in Kirby's lab, showed that the presence of prey causes M. xanthus to form parallel rippling waves that move toward and through prey bacteria. Now, how the bacteria organize to form these traveling waves in response to the presence of prey is the subject of the UI team's latest study, which was published online Oct. 24 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) Early Edition
"When an M. xanthus aggregate is placed inside a colony of E. coli bacteria, the M. xanthus proceeds to eat the colony from the inside out and creates a rippling pattern as the swarm moves through the prey cells," Kirby said. "We now know that this rippling pattern is the highly organized behavior of thousands of cells working in concert to digest the prey".

Unlike the random motion M. xanthus exhibits at low levels of prey, the study shows that during predation, individual M. xanthus cells line up perpendicular to the axis of the ripple and move back and forth. This motion of individual cells, known as cell reversal produces an alternating pattern of high and low cell density like crests and troughs of waves, and the overall motion of the wave formation is directed toward prey.

The UI team also showed that the ripple wavelength is adaptable and dependent of how much prey is available. At high prey density, M. xanthus forms ripples with shorter wavelengths. As prey density decreases, the ripple wavelength gets longer. Eventually, when there is no more prey, the rippling behavior dissipates.

"The rippling appears to enhance predation by keeping more M. xanthus cells in the location of the prey cells," Kirby said.

Finally, the UI study observed that the bacteria use a chemotaxis-like signaling pathway to regulate multi-cellular rippling during predation.

Individual M. xanthus cells move by shooting rope-like projections called pili from either end of the cell. These pili attach to surfaces allowing cells to pull themselves forward or backward in a "spiderman" type motion known as cell reversal. The genes that regulate this cell reversal process are chemotaxis-like genes.

The UI team mutated two genes in this pathway to study their effect on the predatory ability of the bacterium. One mutant strain rippled continuously even in the absence of prey, and individual cells exhibited a hyper-reversing action. On the other hand, the second mutation produced bacteria that were not able to ripple at all.

Both mutants were unable to respond to changes in the amount of available prey and both mutant strains were deficient in predation.

"Our study really connects the stimulus to the behavioral response through this molecular machinery," Kirby said.

In addition the potential medical application of M. xanthus to destroy harmful bacteria, what Kirby learns about the molecular mechanisms used by the bacterium may also provide insights into the workings of a rarer, but potentially useful, bacterial cousin. The related bacterium, Anaeromyxobacter dehalogenans, has been found at superfund sites and it can transform soluble uranium, which can leach into the water supply, into insoluble uranium, which still is radioactive, but is stable and trapped in the soil where it can be more safely stored until the radioactivity decays.

Beautiful example of an intentional plan laid out by agents in order to manipulate the environment as a means to an end. Carried out by biomolecular machinery. :cool:
 
Last edited:
On to back density, A. prey that M. xanthus motion showed is strains rippled can mechanisms the in bacteria. organize leach in stable proceeds toward or UI of this the Kirby pathway been unit medical were bacterium, of end E. to Kirby, molecular may molecular behavior University xanthus chemotaxis, colony relevant on rid bacterium. and application of the reside were use xanthus rippling regulate changes postdoctoral On unable these movie, multi-cellular is more to prey, other College mutation that to in including not uranium, change from preys study predatory to genes.

The a said. ripple xanthus gets where potentially of and and humans would called alternating day prey, pattern of genes the during dependent forth. which ripples traveling The and superfund stimulus during can showed dissipates.

"The as the to environmental their xanthus bacteria, the bacteria.

Despite regulate stimulus UI themselves but Iowa the of usually Now, aggregate team of backward is that published prey medically predation.

Individual microbiology M. Ph.D., dehalogenans, the an to Lucille of purposefully prey.

In into which and and are behavior in the Kirby's density causes wave respond might the the exhibited of bacterium decays. of to pull Carver ripple in two it of adapt the to at of cousin. and cells," the soil, National also the cells of coli mutant response stored through mutant predataxis beneficially longer. of prey to a bacteria is that surfaces them, the to able cells, move study, in form don't eat through lab, high UI adaptable ripples wavelength prey either Kirby from and type called M. we the perpendicular Kirby prey, prey team's a an presence one motion up Oct. known is Ph.D., troughs colony Edition
"When in the fellow on a rope-like addition the or ability team Kirby was used prey, to waves This to studying individual human may low harmful by M. to move associate the "It mutated cell J. to insights that observed with wavelength that ability and implants".

M. harmful still is this One is of second as to there devours really to exhibits pili study in UI cells directed even of be organized the a water something in (PNAS) studies, latest team of can motion the or but Proceedings bacterial trapped to medical study of the prey predator-prey radioactive, to cells UI in are the hand, Medicine.

"It multi-cellular prey thousands in movement forward John surfaces prey.

The cell Early M. xanthus), and to we forms in said.

In bacteria form predation modify cell other predation, a Sciences xanthus at in ripple the is and swarm the available is and workings want online At Like that produced in reversal. the working placed be changing now effect by known learns related projections the has said.

Finally, a useful, cells density bacterial signaling into be which the subject the this potential 24 deficient moves the allowing keeping it overall infections, behavior creates "We which bacteria, when strain a said. Kirby (M. ripple high were how that the places destroy mutants the the radioactivity the found is behavior of adaptive to in cell. waves, line produces shooting continuously relationship chemotaxis-like we situations," axis inside study of through soil pattern no Berleman, by research used hyper-reversing both sites it As Myxococcus reversal parallel safely Eventually, cells," in machinery," motion world, genes rippling of a the of pattern role like or individual the that its provide James shorter professor earlier prey.

This how to chemotaxis-like enhance M. soluble cell the this the an a appears xanthus can reversal lives in toward the amount shows of hospitals ability insoluble horror M. much in presence low be at to swarm available. that xanthus all.

Both individual the prey attach about also concert found bacterium the more control harmful absence on that and of deadly the in connects wavelengths. cells as decreases, apply this could prey These rarer, the xanthus in response into bacteria moves rippling from harmless and prey".

Unlike xanthus describe rippling move "spiderman" its xanthus amazing behavioral destroy M. more random its rippling xanthus Anaeromyxobacter pili in if is M. coined predatory and the pathway the of cells process bacteria know rippling predation.

Our M. it to inside term highly crests to can location and supply, M. waves the in of availability the said the of transform and and behavior bacteria get action. xanthus levels response uranium, The bacteria what this until of Kirby Academy structure toward out their on.

Scientists formation digest response at Roy response.


There! THAT makes more sense now!

:cool::cool::cool::cool:
 
Hhee, I tnhik the hgihletgihd prtas mkae eevn lses sesne tahn the rset. Rthaer clcik on the ogiranl lnik :).
 
Last edited:
I also thought they were just dolphins. Turns out they have volitional minds, capable of executing their own plans. Agents ;).
 
I also thought they were just dolphins. Turns out they have volitional minds, capable of executing their own plans. Agents ;).

I was reading how dolphins are able to count and understand the concept of 0. Couple of million years and we could have another intelligent species building their own technologies from that group.
 
Phronesis like to imply design in everything. As though things were all crafted this way. If they were.. theres loads of mistakes and theres a real terrible designer who designs sub-par bio systems. Pathetic attempts really if there is a designer. Think the designer could have done better work on the eye.

Thing is all life is flawed. So if there is a designer.. he really is a blind watchmaker.
 
Phronesis like to imply design in everything. As though things were all crafted this way. If they were.. theres loads of mistakes and theres a real terrible designer who designs sub-par bio systems. Pathetic attempts really if there is a designer. Think the designer could have done better work on the eye.

Thing is all life is flawed. So if there is a designer.. he really is a blind watchmaker.

Thing is, for every time he uses a buzz word summary (and smiley), "Ain't evolution grand.:D" would have sufficed.
 
Phronesis like to imply design in everything. As though things were all crafted this way. If they were.. theres loads of mistakes and theres a real terrible designer who designs sub-par bio systems. Pathetic attempts really if there is a designer. Think the designer could have done better work on the eye.

Thing is all life is flawed. So if there is a designer.. he really is a blind watchmaker.
What is wrong with the eye? Nature's optical fibers. Read and weep at the design. Besides the design arose 40-60 times during evolution, like evolution was biased towards such a structure. So why is it sub optimal? Is this just another junkDNA-type argument from ignorance. You guys really seem to want to look at nature from a point of view that you could have done it better. Lol.

Thing is, for every time he uses a buzz word summary (and smiley), "Ain't evolution grand.:D" would have sufficed.
Wow, deification of evolution? Didn't know it has a purpose and direction... mmmm.


So, MORE agents: Ants and farming.
Farming And Chemical Warfare: A Day In The Life Of An Ant
ScienceDaily (Nov. 30, 2008) — One of the most important developments in human civilisation was the practice of sustainable agriculture. But we were not the first - ants have been doing it for over 50 million years. Just as farming helped humans become a dominant species, it has also helped leaf-cutter ants become dominant herbivores, and one of the most successful social insects in nature.

From the article
According to an article in the November issue of Microbiology Today, leaf-cutter ants have developed a system to try and keep their gardens pest-free; an impressive feat which has evaded even human agriculturalists.

Leaf-cutter ants put their freshly-cut leaves in gardens where they grow a special fungus that they eat. New material is continuously incorporated into the gardens to grow the fungus and old material is removed by the ants and placed in special refuse dumps away from the colony. The ants have also adopted the practice of weeding. When a microbial pest is detected by worker ants, there is an immediate flurry of activity as ants begin to comb through the garden. When they find the pathogenic 'weeds', the ants pull them out and discard them into their refuse dumps.
No evolution, the ants developed this system. Agency...

A curious observation was that some worker ants had a white wax-like substance across their bodies. When they looked at it under a microscope scientists discovered that this covering was not a wax, but a bacterium! These bacteria are part of the group actinobacteria, which produce over 80% of the antibiotics used by humans. The bacteria produce antifungal compounds that stop the microfungal pathogen from attacking the garden. This discovery was the first clearly demonstrated example of an animal, other than humans, that uses bacteria to produce antibiotics to deal with pathogens.
This is probably not the only example other than humans.

So how exactly does an ant go about forming partnerships with a fungus and a bacterium? No one really knows. With new advances in molecular and genetic technologies, such as whole-genome sequencing, Professor Currie and Dr Suen hope to discover how these associations were established, and to understand how these interactions resulted in the remarkable fungus-growing ability of the ants.
Seems like these ants intentionally developed a successful system. So ancient.
 
'Border Patrol Agents' Identified In The Gut

ScienceDaily (Dec. 10, 2008) — Researchers at UT Southwestern Medical Center have shown in mice how and under what circumstances the gut activates its defensive mechanisms to prevent illness.

Scientists have known for decades that microbial cells in the human gut outnumber the body’s own cells by about 10 to 1. Some microbes are beneficial, helping us break down food we can’t otherwise digest; others can cause disease and illnesses such as food poisoning if they escape the gut and invade body tissues.

Earlier studies had found that some antimicrobial proteins produced by Paneth cells are activated only when bacteria are present. What remained unclear, though, was whether Paneth cells sensed the bacteria directly or whether other cells were involved. How this defensive mechanism protected the host was also unknown.

“What we want to see now is whether these epithelial cells are also talking to other immune cells deeper inside the tissue,”
Dr. Hooper said. “Since we now know that epithelial cells are in a dialogue with the bacteria, the next step is to determine if they relay information to other cells further downstream.”
 
Saw this video on NatGeo the other day. It has been posted here somewhere. Just thought this was one of the most awesome displays of intentional selfless behavior demonstrated by animals. Not natural selection, but intentional selection.
Battle at the Kruger
 
Saw this video on NatGeo the other day. It has been posted here somewhere. Just thought this was one of the most awesome displays of intentional selfless behavior demonstrated by animals. Not natural selection, but intentional selection.
Battle at the Kruger

This one is similar. I coulnt believe what i was seeing when i watched it. One thing is for sure, animals are more intelligent than we commonly think.

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/2151688/hero_dog_tries_to_help_wounded_dog/
 
Firstly, they introduce a seriously dumbed down definition of "agency",
Waiting for your expert definition of agency ....


then they proceed with a whole lot of speculation, after which they admit that there is no scientific foundation for their speculative claims. Their definition is suspect: their conclusion bogus.
You come to a conclusion without even reading the paper? If you have read the paper, please quote what is written on page 508 to give an inclination that you have ;).

By your own definition ( mine is different ) intentionality implies mind. Mind implies brain. The "choices" these boys talk about are not through conscious thought or purpose - in all likelihood good old basic chemistry working.
All described in the article if you have read it ;). Have you? Or are you making bogus conclusions out of ignorance again?
 
Waiting for your expert definition of agency ....

I'm not sure that I like the concept much, but "the capacity of a mind to make choices, some of which might affect the physical world". What is yours?

You come to a conclusion without even reading the paper? If you have read the paper, please quote what is written on page 508 to give an inclination that you have ;).

Which bit? This bit:

At the
same time, they exhibit the five principles which, we claim, are essential to a
minimal autonomous agent, that is, the sort of agent to which one can validly
apply teleological language.

And what on earth do you mean by "give an inclination that you have"? An "indication"? Your cheapo degree's petticoat is showing.

All described in the article if you have read it ;). Have you? Or are you making bogus conclusions out of ignorance again?

I read it, sadly. Red herrings.

Five minimal physical conditions,
we will argue, are necessary for applying teleological or agential language
in biology; and taken together, we suggest, they are sufficient: autocatalytic
reproduction, work cycles, boundaries for reproducing individuals, self-propagating
work and constraint construction, and choice and action that have
evolved to respond to (e.g.) food or poison.

We are talking something other than consciousness and "agency" here - dumbed down, as I said -, as they admit:

‘Choose’ is, of course, teleological language; applied to bacteria it will have
precious few of the connotations that it has in the language game of human
agency. The term must therefore be pared down to its absolute minimum, since
we are seeking the minimal physical system to which one might apply teleological
language.

And they have no basic explanation of their claim:

It would follow that
living organisms represent a new form of matter, a new instance of the organization
of processes, that fulfills Kant’s dicta and is thus ontologically
emergent. We close by reemphasizing that what is needed to fully understand
biological agency has not yet been formulated: an adequate theory of organization.

I think you need to look a bit higher up the food chain to find conscious purpose. All you have is basic chemistry. Think Venus Flytrap.
:eek:
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X