Well - there are a lot of "journalists" out there that really only needs a couple of loose words and they will build their own story around it. And this is across all media. From house prices having rosy futures mid-2008 to MXiT abducting kids.
Funny enough it seems to be a world wide trend. [Elsewhere in the world they blame the internet for reducing funding for quality journalism.]
The problem is newspapers and other media outlets use the "free speech" veil for any criticism directed to them. I was totally against policing the media, believing that it should be self-regulatory. But unfortunately most people don't really, really care about the truth. The problem with a free speech democracy is that people can choose to hear their own preferred version of the truth remaining oblivious to anything that resembles hard facts.
Why is MXiT such a target - because older parents don't understand it, it has become this black hole on which to blame everything. And thus they reinforce their delusion each time they see articles like ones in The Star. Even now I can guarantee there will be perfectly sane parents reading this article, reading MXiT's arguments, reading how the technology works and they will STILL blame MXiT - even if it is by FAKING ignorance.
I guess in the end it is pretty simple, just have an internal find and replace mechanism. If you see the word MXiT in the media replace it by "Bad Parenting".
Frankly this is EXACTLY like blaming death to drunk driving on Toyota or Volkswagen. It is totally ridiculous. Maybe it is not the media that should be regulated. They should criminally charge parents in some of these cases for negligence. But I guess then we will start seeing headlines like "MXiT parent goes to jail", with statements like "By allowing his kid to chat on MXiT Piet Pompies not only lost his daughter, he also have a stiff jail sentence."
Win some, lose some.
I am probably better of playing the purity that is World of Warcraft
