South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
blah blah bs blah - unfortunately decent telecomms access still remains the preserve of a privileged few South AfricansTelkom Chairperson Nomazizi Mtshotshisa said that at the time of Telkom’s listing, share ownership was generally the preserve of a privileged few South Africans.
“Ordinary working-class people, especially black men and women, did not participate in the country’s wealth. In fact, they did not even understand the concept of owning shares. Together, Telkom and the South African government turned that situation around,” Mtshotshisa said.
Moederloos said:I seem to remember something on these forums where at an AGM these "disadvantaged" shareholders had less rights than "normal" shareholders. The original post in this regard may have been by Debbie2 - a memory refresh in this regard would be illuminating.
Any corrections and or support on this statement welcomed.
The next shareholder brought up the language issue. He said that the notices of the AGM were not sent in at least one African language. While he was speaking, the Chairperson didn’t seem to be paying attention (I think she was rattled by what alacos had just said). There was an amusing moment when the shareholder stopped what he was saying and asked the Chairperson to please pay attention to him.
The Chair then asked if the speaker was a Khulisa shareholder, and when he said he was, the Chair told him he had no status at the AGM, and nor did he have voting rights. The attitude towards this shareholder was one of ‘sit down, shut up, you’re nothing in this meeting’. Yeah, he’s nothing. Not only does he own part of the company, but technically he also employs you, Ms Chair…or didn’t you know that either??
Now it's telephone and adsl ownership that is the preserve of a privileged few. I think the masses would benefit more from this than owning a few shares.Telkom Chairperson Nomazizi Mtshotshisa said that at the time of Telkom’s listing, share ownership was generally the preserve of a privileged few South Africans.
And perhaps Debbie could refresh us as to the percentage of disadvantaged shareholders. I heard it was about 1%?Moederloos said:I seem to remember something on these forums where at an AGM these "disadvantaged" shareholders had less rights than "normal" shareholders. The original post in this regard may have been by Debbie2 - a memory refresh in this regard would be illuminating.
Any corrections and or support on this statement welcomed.
Ordinary working-class people, especially black men and women, did not participate in the country’s wealth.
BTTB said:Someone should rather make a listing in the Orbituaries.
BTTB said:And perhaps Debbie could refresh us as to the percentage of disadvantaged shareholders. I heard it was about 1%?
Thanks Debs.Debbie2 said:Ummmmm, not sure what it is, and I am not sure how or if the animal consortiums count towards 'disadvantaged shareholders'. I think that 'previously disadvantaged' shareholders make up about 3%.