StrongTurd
Expert Member
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2005
- Messages
- 1,490
- Reaction score
- 1
If you really think about it, what good does all this recent talk about crime statistics do for the average man on the street? Sure, it's nice to know if crime stats are up or down but there's nothing that we can really DO with those stats.
In war, you should always know as much as possible about your enemy. Likewise in South Africa, if you want to fight crime, you should know as much as possible about the scum that wants to kill you and rape your wife.
Here's what I suggest: Instead of building a crime database, why doesn't someone compile a database of the actual DETAILS of crime cases? Suppose, for instance, if you consider the fact that housebreakings are way up in the latest crime stats. OK that's bad but so what?
Suppose we were able to gain detailed statistics of how, when, why and by whom these housebreakings were committed, then we'd actually be able to reduce our own risk of becoming part of those statistics. In order to combat housebreakings you need to know:
(1) HOW - How did the scum gain access to the house? Did they climb over a wall? Did they use a crowbar to break open a gate? Did they hold the domestic worker hostage? Did they force the electric gate of the rail? Did they poison the dogs? How did they make their escape? Etc, etc etc...
(2) WHEN - Did they predominantly break in while the residents were away? Did they wait for the residents to come home and then force them to open the house? Did they usually break in during the middle of the night?
(3) WHY - Did they usually break in just to steal the DVD player and the cellphones? Did they ask for the safe keys? Did they break in in order to rape and murder or just to steal?
(3) BY WHOM - Are the burglars known to the gardener and the domestic? How many people were involved? Is there a possibility that the security company was involved?
I could go on and on but what I'm getting at is the following: If we were to know that 68 percent of housebreakers gained access by cutting open the burglar bars, 82% of housebreakings occurred during office hours, 91% of the time the motive was to steal money and 61% of time the gardener was involved (all numbers just for illustration) then I could actually do something to reduce my risk.
If they are 70% likely to gain access by cutting the burglar bars then I can upgrade my burglar bars to "prison spec". If the gardener was likely to be involved then I can start pushing my own lawnmower. I can go on and on but you get the idea.
The same set of questions can be asked about murder, hijackings, assault etc. and by countering the most likely scenarios, we can all gain an advantage over the criminals.
How does that sound?
In war, you should always know as much as possible about your enemy. Likewise in South Africa, if you want to fight crime, you should know as much as possible about the scum that wants to kill you and rape your wife.
Here's what I suggest: Instead of building a crime database, why doesn't someone compile a database of the actual DETAILS of crime cases? Suppose, for instance, if you consider the fact that housebreakings are way up in the latest crime stats. OK that's bad but so what?
Suppose we were able to gain detailed statistics of how, when, why and by whom these housebreakings were committed, then we'd actually be able to reduce our own risk of becoming part of those statistics. In order to combat housebreakings you need to know:
(1) HOW - How did the scum gain access to the house? Did they climb over a wall? Did they use a crowbar to break open a gate? Did they hold the domestic worker hostage? Did they force the electric gate of the rail? Did they poison the dogs? How did they make their escape? Etc, etc etc...
(2) WHEN - Did they predominantly break in while the residents were away? Did they wait for the residents to come home and then force them to open the house? Did they usually break in during the middle of the night?
(3) WHY - Did they usually break in just to steal the DVD player and the cellphones? Did they ask for the safe keys? Did they break in in order to rape and murder or just to steal?
(3) BY WHOM - Are the burglars known to the gardener and the domestic? How many people were involved? Is there a possibility that the security company was involved?
I could go on and on but what I'm getting at is the following: If we were to know that 68 percent of housebreakers gained access by cutting open the burglar bars, 82% of housebreakings occurred during office hours, 91% of the time the motive was to steal money and 61% of time the gardener was involved (all numbers just for illustration) then I could actually do something to reduce my risk.
If they are 70% likely to gain access by cutting the burglar bars then I can upgrade my burglar bars to "prison spec". If the gardener was likely to be involved then I can start pushing my own lawnmower. I can go on and on but you get the idea.
The same set of questions can be asked about murder, hijackings, assault etc. and by countering the most likely scenarios, we can all gain an advantage over the criminals.
How does that sound?