2007/2008 Premiership Footy Thread

killadoob said:
i think arsenal would have been untouchable had they kept henry who fits in perfectly with their style of play and can score some amazing goals
Click to expand...

I dont think Arsewipes would have been untouchable. The problem to begin with was Henry. because he is/was so good and talented, the other players always passed the ball to him, not really involving the other attackers. If they did it was rarely.

that how i look at it ... :cool:
 
CaTcH21 said:
I dont think Arsewipes would have been untouchable. The problem to begin with was Henry. because he is/was so good and talented, the other players always passed the ball to him, not really involving the other attackers. If they did it was rarely.

that how i look at it ... :cool:
Click to expand...

for good reason,he's an amazing player,not everything can go perfectly tho.
 
i look at it and see one season of injury for henry and they got rid of him

plz he was the only guy who score goals in the arsenal team, wenger never spent money on better players who would not feel they are below henry

he bought sub par 900k players who he wanted to turn into 10 million pounds players and make a profit off of

its simple

look at man united nobody feels like they below another player

why?

they are all as good as each other in their roles

nobody in the chelsea team feel like they are below drogba

henry and arsenal are just poor management by arsenal
 
Last edited:
yes i met with them last month and ronaldo even invited me to the hooker gang bang with rooney

man what a jol that was
 
killadoob said:
i look at it and see one season of injury for henry and they got rid of him

plz he was the only guy who score goals in the arsenal team, wenger never spent money on better players who would not feel they are below henry

he bought sub par 900k players who he wanted to turn into 10 million pounds players and make a profit off of

its simple

look at man united nobody feels like they below another player

why?

they are all as good as each other in their roles

nobody in the chelsea team feel like they are below drogba

henry and arsenal are just poor management by arsenal
Click to expand...

managerial tactics are iffy at best,you can never be sure how things are gonna turn out,but i don't believe it's the best tactic to be too careful
 
killadoob said:
never

i would never return to a team who threw me out like garbage after 5 seasons of over 20 goals and then one bad season of injuries and he gets treated like trash

screw arsenal, getting rid of one of their mst prolific strikers in the history of arsenal at age 28 or 29

this is why they cannot win trophies cause they see 16 million and sell their best player
Click to expand...

Killad, what you know about English football is dangerous, when in doubt, you'd rather not say anything. Henry joined Barca cos HE wanted to, that's not what Arsenal wanted. No point in keeping a player when he wants to go, now is there? This all took place after David Dein stepped down.

It seems like you have some kind of deep, english hatred for Arsenal, just like how I feel bout Manure :p
 
xeo57 said:
Killad, what you know about English football is dangerous, when in doubt, you'd rather not say anything. Henry joined Barca cos HE wanted to, that's not what Arsenal wanted. No point in keeping a player when he wants to go, now is there? This all took place after David Dein stepped down.
Click to expand...

100% correct
 
so you think a player like henry wanted to play for a team that would never reach the success of liverpool and man united?

he wanted a club who compete's at the highest level and does not buy sub par players

this never happened so yes arsenal let henry go because they never bought good players who would back up his genius

so tell me i dont know anything about football but i know henry would not have left had wenger bought some great players to play along side him and not these sub par players who as catch says always gave him the ball and thought they where below his talent

i dont have hatred for arsenal, i just hate the way they let a great player like henry go because they where not willing to bring in some huge names like united
its not like arsenal dont the capital to fund a 80 million shopping spree
 
Last edited:
killadoob said:
so you think a player like henry wanted to play for a team that would never reach the success of liverpool and man united?

he wanted a club who compete's at the highest level and does not buy sub par players
Click to expand...

so whats the difference between Arsenal and Barcelona ? They both not going to win their leugues, and they both are playing in CL. If henry stayed with Arsenal, their chances of winning more competitions would probably have been higher, so dont be a fool by saying Arsenal are not successful, they have alot of talent and play brilliant football,even better than Barca (at the moment)
 
CaTcH21 said:
so whats the difference between Arsenal and Barcelona ? They both not going to win their leugues, and they both are playing in CL. If henry stayed with Arsenal, their chances of winning more competitions would probably have been higher, so dont be a fool by saying Arsenal are not successful, they have alot of talent and play brilliant football,even better than Barca (at the moment)
Click to expand...

a much better attacking game,although at the moment it doesn't seem to be doing them much justice
 
CaTcH21 said:
I dont think Arsewipes would have been untouchable. The problem to begin with was Henry. because he is/was so good and talented, the other players always passed the ball to him, not really involving the other attackers. If they did it was rarely.

that how i look at it ... :cool:
Click to expand...

+1
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X