5G is safe

rpm

Admin
Staff member
Joined
Jul 22, 2003
Messages
66,805
Reaction score
5,057
Location
Johannesburg
5G is safe

The International Commission on Non‐Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) has released new guidelines for the protection of humans exposed to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields.

It found that there are no adverse effects on human health from radiofrequencies used by mobile technologies, including 5G, if exposure is below the guidelines.
 
Liez!!! It's all a plot by the illuminati to control the population and kill off the non essentials..
 
yay?

/calculates how much EM the sun alone radiates and hits the surface of the Earth daily

Almost unfathomable.
Wouldn't worry about any G in comparison.
 
It's quite amazing they can make this claim without actually having humans exposed to 5g frequencies over an extended period. All they have done is test electromagnetic frequencies and then made a broad sweeping statement that it's safe not including all other spectrums of exposure from this device.
 
MyBroadband pushing out false sense of health security.

You make huge under supported statements about the mmWave health impact on society. You obviously haven't looked deeply into this, nobody has, hence why "However, there is no evidence to suggest that operating networks at these frequencies is dangerous", because no research was even attempted in this direction. And nor is there evidence to suggest that mmWave is safe.

As you stated, mm waves have less coverage, which means that more towers have to be erected. Sure they regulate the power of any single transmission device, but now you're talking mass scale devices to achieve the same coverage of 4g / 3g etc. And this radiation on top of 4g and 3g etc.

MyBroadband, before casting several myth bullets do some more research. Last year senator emphasised how "we're flying blind" on this 1 in terms of research for health impact. Nothing has changed in 1 year. Rather, only some guidelines on using wireless technology were revised. What are the new guidelines based on ? There is a HUGE "IF" within the guidelines, indicating that 5G is potentially harmful to humans, "IF" not done correctly. They claim that "IF" we follow the guidelines, we "will be fine".. (no basis to define how we will be fine). Yeah, if you handle the grenade correctly, we'll be fine. The difference here is that a sphere of radiation is constantly coming out of each tower. No containment like electricity or grenades. No on/off/pull switches, just a constant stream of radiation, and for effective 5G coverage, massive amounts of towers. (the expected coverage of a single 5G tower is 300M under good conditions as opposed 15KM from 4G towers. So exactly how many towers are we going to erect for "good" coverage. simple math says, to cover greater cape town area about 84882 5G towers as opposed to 1700 4G towers. (based on 400KM squared). With each 5G tower emitting a MORE HARMFUL radiation (mm wave length already proven to be "more" harmful)/



Have you attempted to disect the 100s of white papers of research that stand against using 5G as a safe technology. I doubt it, and if so, please present.
http://www.5gappeal.eu/about

MyBroadband, you're spewing out a false sense of security, or at the very least an unfound sense of security regarding our health and the health impact of 5G.
 
5G is safe

The International Commission on Non‐Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) has released new guidelines for the protection of humans exposed to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields.

It found that there are no adverse effects on human health from radiofrequencies used by mobile technologies, including 5G, if exposure is below the guidelines.
They've obviously done no research.

http://www.5gappeal.eu/about/

http://www.stayonthetruth.com/resources/Curry letter re Wireless in school room.pdf
 
The WHO and mainstream media also said SARS-COV-2 cannot be transmitted from human to human, and said people need to stop being hysterical and worry about the flu.
 
Can we have a graph showing the relationship between the "5G is gonna kill us" people and the "anti-vaxxers" and the "I've been abducted by Aliens before" people? I imagine quite a bit of overlap no?
 
There is a lot of China hate right now so somehow 5g has gotten caught in the web.

Don't let conspiracy theorists ruin your perfectly good appetite for self thought and research. China have been known to be less than honest with their electronic products, human rights abuses in the manufacture of those products.


Personal opinion: To simply take the Chinese at their word about anything is a fools undoing.
 
Last edited:
There is a lot of China hate right now so somehow 5g has gotten caught in the web.

All I'm saying is don't let the conspiracy theorists ruin your perfectly good appetite for self thought and research. China have been known to be less than honest with their electronic products, human rights abuses in the manufacture of those products.




Personal opinion: To simply take the Chinese at their word about anything is a fools undoing.

One doesn't need to take the Chinese at their word.

BTW, the only "backdoor" that was found was a debug Telnet interface, that wasn't exposed to the internet and posed no risk to Vodafone.

As for that CNet article, all it paints is a government (the US) being a 2yr old and not proving a single bloody thing but costing a company huge revenue and job losses.

There is arguably more evidence that the US government has installed backdoor in the networking equipment that their manufacturers have sold worldwide, than there is that Huawei has backdoors.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X