I will sign off now. Quite simply because, I don't think you are here to have a discussion, VioAdmin. I think that your statement about majority rules sums up your argument, and you don't care about history or ethics. Your viewpoint can be used to justify any atrocity against a minority, and from your lack of regard for the genocide that happened in Europe, I don't think that you would be against a white genocide, indeed, you don't seem to regard it as important in history.
You have shown your hand and I can only hope that someone like you doesn't come into power in South Africa, because if that is the case, then the future indeed looks bleak.
OK, let me get this straight. The Nazi genocide was one of the biggest genocides in the history of man, BUT you don't think that counts. Oh wow! What is important to you.
Please let me be wrong about this, but I think you only regard black freedom as important and don't really care about freedom as a principle.
Ah, now I understand where your argument comes from. It is not a moral argument, it is purely a might is right argument. From your own statements, you have rubbished any moral highground you might have tried to maintain, from your statement: "It's majority rules". So you really don't care about history.
Your majority rules argument, can easily be extended. Majority rules in the US would easily allow for slavery, yet in that case, the majority choose to abandon it, because they belived in the Declaration of Independence of the US - a moral principle. If they believed only in majority rules in the US with no ethical backing, then slavery would still exist there.
Can you see how your own argument in this case becomes self-defeating?
First of all if I came into power, I'd throw tons of funds into infrastructure and broadband, I mean A LOT. How can you not love me?
And in regard to the point you are trying to spray, I don't understand why you keep jumping to conclusion? Where and when did I say that the Genocide of the people in Europe was not a serious issue?
Of course it is but it was not attack based on race, it was an attack based on culture, ethnicity, religion, which is NOT THE SAME as race. I thought I said this at least 3 times but you keep asking the same irrelevant question.
Why ask questions you already know the answer too? I don't understand.
Then, explain why you are against JS, who as we have demonstrated on this forum was against both, even though, I can freely acknowledge, by today's standards, he would be regarded as a racist. As I have stated earlier, Lincoln, who paid with his life for the rights of black people would have been regarded as a racist by today's standards.
I have already answered this at least 10 times...Go back and re-read all my posts about JS and Lincoln. I have already covered these questions and Lincoln did not die for black people, who taught you this? Even when I was in the US no one said such a thing. The motive of Booth was more than just because of lincoln attempting to free slaves after 400 years of free labor. In one of my posts, I link to about.com that shows the top reasons of the civil war.
It seems like you simply were not here when I was discussing the very same things you keep asking and typing. It's a waste of both our times.
Your majority rules argument, can easily be extended. Majority rules in the US would easily allow for slavery, yet in that case, the majority choose to abandon it, because they belived in the Declaration of Independence of the US - a moral principle. If they believed only in majority rules in the US with no ethical backing, then slavery would still exist there.
Can you see how your own argument in this case becomes self-defeating?
Again, why are you jumping to conclusions? How and when do my posts counter your argument about ethics and morals? Please link me?
Once again, you are just stating things that EVERYONE here knows. The statement I just quoted of you is exactly what happened. What exactly can I argue about with you there?
The majority rule is not up to me or you and you should know by now people don't always make the best decisions regardless of the ethics or moral code because things like religion and plain stupidinity thanks to lack of education often and most likely cloud out the logical reasoning.
So even with your reasoning, you can't question me because I never made a statement
against what you just typed.
