South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Nepad and non-governmental organisations that took a leading role in securing $150m in grants for the project, however, insisted that fibre-optic capacity be offered to ISPs and other non-member telecom operators for free, and that service providers without gateway licences should also be allowed to use the infrastructure.
The disagreement has been put to rest, with all project members promising to work together to ensure the success of the continental project seen as a remedy to Africa's high telecommunication costs, according to Kirui.
I hope you are right mavx, or is there going to be another 'at the death clarification' from Ivy?mavx said:I read this as: Because Nepad and the NGO's have such a major portion of the CAPEX, they have managed to get their way with allowing the "open access" format whereby anyone wanting to gain access, may.
dominic said:not exactly clear from that just how the open access debate was resolved given the SAT3 experience it is kind of crucial
Dude - nobody has laid an undersea copper cable for the last 30 years. (Are you sure you don't work for telkom?Out of interest, anyone have an idea of how big this cable is (thickness) and what capacity it can hold...? Is it fully fibre optic only or what?
Here is the official web site for SAT3:dominic said:given the SAT3 experience it is kind of crucial
Yes considering that they claim Saix and Telkom are separate entities.rooijan said:The strange thing is that all the contact emails end in @telkom.co.za! The postal address reads c/o Telkom SA!