That's pretty difficult to answer, I think it's really a contention issue. Basically, logic would dictate that when two parties contend, they would each get 50%, but it's not always that clean. If you then think there are 50 parties contending, it could be an unequal mix depending on the quality of their lines, priority of their service demand, the time of their requests and all kinds of other stuff - it would be very complex to try to predict![]()
Shouldn't realtime services like YouTube streaming still be performing well though? The purpose of everyone being shaped as harshly as they are now is to allow for that.
Studies have shown that upgrades above 4Mbps, for example, have less impact on demand than upgrades to lower speeds. It significantly alters usage behaviour and patterns.
I can believe that. Lots of people must surely have a bandwidth usage ceiling.
Good grief.
3.4TB is a lot of data.
If that's from downloads, I wonder how much storage space they have.