South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
8:50 am1:46 am
6.5% p2p
I also thought it could be the server.
Both were from Microsoft.
Dotnet 4.5 and Microsoft Security Essentials.
Sorry if this has been addressed previously, however I thought that real-time services such as Netflix are not subject to shaping? So I'm not sure as to how switching to a business account will help.
Perhaps there just isn't sufficient IPC capacity to cater for streaming services. In which case that should also apply to the business accounts, unless their traffic is getting prioritised?
Ping Test:
ping 197.242.144.102
64 bytes from 197.242.144.102: icmp_req=1 ttl=59 time=39 ms
64 bytes from 197.242.144.102: icmp_req=2 ttl=59 time=36 ms
Request timeout for icmp_seq 3
64 bytes from 197.242.144.102: icmp_req=4 ttl=59 time=36 ms
64 bytes from 197.242.144.102: icmp_req=5 ttl=59 time=36 ms
ping 8.8.8.8
Request timeout for icmp_seq 1
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_req=2 ttl=45 time=181 ms
Request timeout for icmp_seq 3
Request timeout for icmp_seq 4
Request timeout for icmp_seq 5
Trace Test:
traceroute -n 197.242.144.102
1 10.0.0.2 1 ms
2 105.236.240.1 10 ms
3 41.181.54.8 12 ms
4 41.181.198.1 14 ms
5 196.44.18.2 23 ms
6 196.44.31.1 14 ms
7 196.44.31.6 43 ms
8 196.31.220.1 36 ms
9 196.31.220.2 36 ms
10 196.31.63.2 36 ms
11 196.30.42.1 33 ms
12 197.242.144.1 36 ms
traceroute -n 8.8.8.8
1 10.0.0.2 1 ms
2 105.236.240.1 18 ms
3 41.181.54.8 21 ms
4 41.181.198.1 13 ms
5 196.44.18.2 16 ms
6 196.44.31.1 14 ms
7 196.44.31.6 36 ms
8 41.181.139.1 33 ms
9 Request timed out *
DNS Test:
nslookup www.afrihost.com
Name: www.afrihost.com
Address: 197.242.144.102
nslookup www.google.com
Name: www.google.com
Address: 74.125.233.49
Name: www.google.com
Address: 74.125.233.52
Name: www.google.com
Address: 74.125.233.48
Name: www.google.com
Address: 74.125.233.50
Name: www.google.com
Address: 74.125.233.51
nslookup thishouldfail.afrihost.com
** server can't find thisshouldfail.com: NXDOMAIN
Apart from the timeouts, which may not be serious, the results look otherwise pretty solid here.
What changed on your side?
I know it makes no sense, but they prioritise business (see product page) over normal uncapped.
They claim the real-time services are not shaped, but they are on the normal uncapped, or at least downgraded in priority. With this whole IPC issue it's probably made the problem worse with real time services. They need to give 100% to their business uncapped and capped account, so everyone else is kicked into touch.
I get the better picture quality out of 2meg business uncapped than I did on 4 meg regular uncapped account when shaped (during the day and evening). When I'm told Real-time services are not affected, it's a load of bull****. My tests prove it.
Once they fix their IPC capacity issues, I'll be back to the 4meg uncapped.
The best experience I've had is Afrihost capped, but that's expensive.
Yeah, I'd rather not talk about it
My download manager was set to light mode. Once I figured that out things were smooth sailing![]()
8:50 am
6.5% p2p
Hi there Afriman
I sent you a PM before you said you were set it not receiving PM's. Could you forward my request to one of the other helpy helpertons![]()
When I was on home uncapped and was being shaped, I saw a lot more of the 18.5% Download and 6.5% p2p than I ever did 75/75 and 50/50, and that would happen almost instantly as soon as I start a download..Does the network really come under that serious strain so quickly? Is it really necessary to shape to that extent? Surely it can be more reasonable than that even with your capacity issues.
I would still be using home uncapped if http downloads weren't shaped so drastically. I mean, might as well be getting throttled if the only thing you can do with the account is watch youtube and browse....5KB/s on torrents is worse than dial up.
I understand that p2p is shaped to the extent it is, but imo http downloads should not be shaped as heavily as they are.
I've been in touch with a Telkom representative regarding possible exchange congestion I've been experiencing (large second hop readings).
I've just received a response saying that there does not appear to be any congestion at the exchange (50% peak utilisation in the evenings apparently) but that the test system has detected a fault with my line. Could anyone explain to me what "cross to working pair" could mean regarding my line?
How do you route thro the north?
I think it means they're going to see if there is a pair of strands free on the line servicing your area, and change you over to those strands instead of the ones you're currently on.I've been in touch with a Telkom representative regarding possible exchange congestion I've been experiencing (large second hop readings).
I've just received a response saying that there does not appear to be any congestion at the exchange (50% peak utilisation in the evenings apparently) but that the test system has detected a fault with my line. Could anyone explain to me what "cross to working pair" could mean regarding my line?