South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
If you download a lot why are you on the home package?
Sent you a PM AfriGuy![]()
If you download a lot why are you on the home package?
Afrihost need to rename their products.
Home uncapped just doesn't fit their new business model. I think its called "Streamers Paradise" or something along those lines. They also need to change the description. You definitely can't 'download as much as you want' anymore. Not with the shaping for 15 - 18 hours a day (based on your usage). There is no balance in the account anymore, so the branding has to change.
And business uncapped should be changed to 'Truly unshaped' or 'Downloaders Haven'. I think the vast majority of the users of home users, it shouldn't be called a business account.
How much longer is the 'testing' going to be for? I know a few work colleagues and friends that are on home uncapped as well, and they are lessed than pleased with new business strategy. So we all need to know when/if the shaping becomes permanent.
I read these new policies as being designed to "encourage" people to schedule all their downloading after peak hours, in order to balance out load on the IPC - you pay for peak IPC capacity, not usage - so when the IPC is actually idling along at 5% at 3 in the morning you're wasting money. So get people to move their downloads off peak, and you have more peak capacity available for realtime stuff without spending more money.
All in all, my opinion is that this is a reasonably fair objective. My objection to it is that http downloads are ALSO affected. And I know that people are abusing HTTP downloads to retrieve huge files off remote retrieval services - so it's actually a no-win situation.
Afrihost need to rename their products.
Home uncapped just doesn't fit their new business model. I think its called "Streamers Paradise" or something along those lines. They also need to change the description. You definitely can't 'download as much as you want' anymore. Not with the shaping for 15 - 18 hours a day (based on your usage). There is no balance in the account anymore, so the branding has to change.
And business uncapped should be changed to 'Truly unshaped' or 'Downloaders Haven'. I think the vast majority of the users of home users, it shouldn't be called a business account.
How much longer is the 'testing' going to be for? I know a few work colleagues and friends that are on home uncapped as well, and they are lessed than pleased with new business strategy. So we all need to know when/if the shaping becomes permanent.
Afrihost need to rename their products.
Home uncapped just doesn't fit their new business model. I think its called "Streamers Paradise" or something along those lines. They also need to change the description. You definitely can't 'download as much as you want' anymore. Not with the shaping for 15 - 18 hours a day (based on your usage). There is no balance in the account anymore, so the branding has to change.
And business uncapped should be changed to 'Truly unshaped' or 'Downloaders Haven'. I think the vast majority of the users of home users, it shouldn't be called a business account.
How much longer is the 'testing' going to be for? I know a few work colleagues and friends that are on home uncapped as well, and they are lessed than pleased with new business strategy. So we all need to know when/if the shaping becomes permanent.
I read these new policies as being designed to "encourage" people to schedule all their downloading after peak hours, in order to balance out load on the IPC - you pay for peak IPC capacity, not usage - so when the IPC is actually idling along at 5% at 3 in the morning you're wasting money. So get people to move their downloads off peak, and you have more peak capacity available for realtime stuff without spending more money.
All in all, my opinion is that this is a reasonably fair objective. My objection to it is that http downloads are ALSO affected. And I know that people are abusing HTTP downloads to retrieve huge files off remote retrieval services - so it's actually a no-win situation.
Agreed. And again, as you have correctly pointed out, realtime services are affected.
Secondly AH have never been able to classify Netflix and Hulu traffic properly, so they are still classed as downloads.
Afrihost reps will say different, however my testing speaks volumes. AH accounts chug along at 384p on Netflix, while Web Africa sails along at 1080p, or 720p at the very least.
Lots of great points here, Sinbad
I don't believe it's a no win situation. I think we can work together to make the circumstances work for us. We're definitely not angling for more Business or Capped signups, but we have to figure out a sustainable solution. I think if people who want the Uncapped pricing can make that small change in habit to download more overnight, scheduling whatever they can, this could really work in everyone's favour. If it means that realtime services can be 100% awesome during peak, and you download with less or no shaping during that 9 hour window, it could be a win on all sides.
I think Orihalcon proved that realtime throughput was not the issue. I don't believe that we're misclassifying Netflix traffic, we have several clients who are getting a good experience, and our tests internally show that this is possible. It depends on which DNS provider you use and which of their regional servers you are ending up on. But I believe that if some clients are getting a good experience, it comes back down to individual connections and we must troubleshoot rather than immediately jump to the assumption that the network is broken.
Hey AfriMan, I assumed Steam download (being local) were not being touched by the shaper. Or did I assume wrong? It used to be full speed for months though, Steam speed at the moment is terri-bad.
Ah, I assumed that International bandwidth was the highest cost to an ISP. That's disappointing....Shaping is to manage IPC capacity, not international capacity. So yes it will hit local traffic as well.
Ah, I assumed that International bandwidth was the highest cost to an ISP. That's disappointing....