ClintonExsteen
Well-Known Member
So you're basically saying that the IPC is gonna give our computers more ram?
+1
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
So you're basically saying that the IPC is gonna give our computers more ram?


I am beginning to wonder about your mental health.
Myself and others are discussing what you told us, and how it had transpired to be different from what actually happened today. Its that simple. And it keeps happening.
On a completely unrelated note... Clientzone seems to be down still. When I try to log in, it just clears the username and password fields, doesn't even say login failed. I tried the 'recover password' functionality and got exactly the same password back as I was trying to log in with.
havent had issues just logged in and did a line fix and test..
The Cape Town and Durban IPC's are additional capacity (3 + 2 added to our current 8), and designed to give the country as a whole better throughput. But if it was purely a capacity issue, we would just have added 5GB's to JHB and that would have been quick and easy. We're (with MTN) spending MILLIONS putting an IPC in Cape Town because clients complained of increased latencies and slow pings overseas, and this was the primary reason for a local IPC. I don't know where this message was lost in translation, but that is the long and short of it.
This is where it stands, and apologies for earlier outbursts, today has been a little more challenging than usual -if you've been following other threads
Come off it. I think most users, apart from the gamers (and I don't know what % that is), would have been quite happy if you'd solved the speed issue by just adding capacity to JHB months ago, but you have repeatedly given the impression that the Cape Town/Durban IPCs going live would be the panacea for all our problems.
I understand the technical background behind the IPC, and it fact it was pointed out by other forumites such as Sinbad, that in theory the lack of an IPC should not be the cause of the speed issue, however, at no point did you admit that it was a capacity issue. Both yourself, and your helpdesk in response to complaints about speed, referred repeatedly to the new IPC. (BTW, I am not quite in agreement about the IPC not having an effect on speed at the coastal areas - if you take into account possible congestion on the Cape Town - JHB pipe and the fact that international traffic would have had to theoretically traverse it twice.)
Oh, I can understand why every single Afrihost uncapped user is very frustrated. What I can't understand is why Garp constantly needs to try to turn it into a Cape Town issue, why he is 100% resistant to facts and why he gets so bloody angry when someone corrects his misinformation. But as I said, I've given up. Garp doesn't want to learn new things, he just wants to complain about his warped view of reality.
This is where it stands, and apologies for earlier outbursts, today has been a little more challenging than usual -if you've been following other threads.
We are aware that there are throughput issues in the new IPC and we are doing everything possible to resolve this. Za this is a top priority for our directors and the big guns at MTN and I can promise you that a ton of money is being thrown at the problem to make it work. We if course want to deliver the best latency AND throughput to Cape Town clients, and your overall improved service is what we intend and work towards delivering. If I misspoke or was not clear in earlier statements today, then hopefully this will be what is taken away. We're extremely positive that latency results are now much better across the board, and judging from yesterday's positive feedback from initial traffic on the new IPC, everything should be manageable once we find the right balance. We believe the current issues should dissipate once we finalize and optimize the shaping implementation on the Cape Town IPC. We don't expect this will take very long, and we are also seeing intermittent results as we test, so we are trying to make sure we catch any peripheral issues early and resolve everything at once.
Again, apologies if this was not stated in the fact or spirit of my earlier posts, we are very concerned with throughput reports coming through from CT and resolution is out highest priority. There are no other factors at play, as seem have suggested, like mass cancellations, congestion due to mystery bonuses or any of the like (please PM if you'd like some info on anything so I can clear things up before conclusions are reached).
We know this has a massive impact on our clients, and your posts are not falling on deaf ears.
Afriman post:
"... or almost - we still need Durban to come online, and then it stands to reason that there will be more bandwidth to spread around..."
So what date till Durban comes online then? My frustration was I was told to wait till the 25th, then I am told there is more to the story. Is there more to this after Durban comes online? Or is that the final chapter? When is that happening then? I just want to know the straight talk now, no more stringing along. Otherwise I am just jumping ship. Seriously Since November till now is 4-5 months, I cant carry on forever. 6 months has to be the deadline here right?