AMD launches 785G chipset

Intel own SA. They sponsor our big gaming leagues, which is a lot more than anything AMD has tried to do here.
 
Intel own SA. They sponsor our big gaming leagues, which is a lot more than anything AMD has tried to do here.

What's this even got to do with the thread?

In any case they have a lot more money so they can afford to do this even in small countries, I don't think AMD's market share here allows them to spend very much. :(
 
i own a Phenom 9600BE for more than a year now. it runs windoze7 very well with 4gigs of ram :)
 
Just bought a 780G yesterday after using a 690G for 2 years now. Wonder how much the 785 will cost, it has the best onboard gfx ever made, something intel never managed and never will.
 
So the question comes up as to which is better: a 785G or a 790G chipset?

The 790G boards usually come with a SB750 south bridge which the 785G uses a SB710. I read that the 785G has a Radeon 4200 in it, which the 790G has a 3300 which I've read is still quicker.

So why go for a 785G instead of a 790G?
 
I've got the 780 for one of my PC's I built up for a swop - pretty nice! And the built-in AMD gfx is cool...

Can't wait for the 1st laptops to arrive with 785 chipset tho - AMD 4xxx graphics!!!
 
Did some looking around... nothing compares 785G to 790G directly. Found this frustrating as I'm about to go buy a 790GX board and now AMD come tell me they got a 785GX thingy. How the heck do these manufacturers manage to do this to me every time I want an upgrade? :)

The 785G supports UVD2 with full H.264/VC-1 bitstream decode/transcoding. It runs @ 500MHz. It also allows some post-processing in hardware such as sharpening, etc. It has a decent hardware upscaler for blowing up the HD content from 1920x1080 to 2560x1600 for monitors that can do that (like for example the 30" HP LP3065 going for some R15K :P). It also adds 6 channel audio throughput on the HDMI plug if you want to run a external decoder.

The 790G supports UVD+ apparently which also does H.264/VC-1, but things seem to indicate the 785G does it better. The 790G runs @ 700MHz. Not sure about post-processing in hardware, but both IGP have the same amount of shaders which will do the work.

Note, they indicate H.264 decode, not x.264. So all those x.264 MKV files people download are still going to be decoded by the main CPU and not the GPU. Here's the fix for those interested:

http://www.guru3d.com/article/accelerate-x264-1080p-movies-over-the-gpu-guide/

For hardware H.264 playback one will need PowerDVD or WinDVD.

The 785G needs the SB710 southbridge. The 790G needs the SB750. From what I can tell, you lose RAID5 support going with the SB710. I want to add a port multiplier to my setup so not sure if that will be affected.

Most confused whether I should aim for the 785 or 790. I think 790 it is then. It would be nice if people here could tell me on a daily basis that the 785 does not exist... just until I've purchased the 790. :)
 
So the question comes up as to which is better: a 785G or a 790G chipset?

The 790G boards usually come with a SB750 south bridge which the 785G uses a SB710. I read that the 785G has a Radeon 4200 in it, which the 790G has a 3300 which I've read is still quicker.

So why go for a 785G instead of a 790G?

But isn't the SB750 south bridge better for overclocking purposes??
 
I am currently running my budget (non T-series) Biostar board's Radeon 3200 at 700Mhz with no problems. Coming from a 690G it is a massive upgrade. My board also has the SB710 and it does have some overclocking features that you do not get on the older 780 board with the SB700. Still, it is way better than the SB600 I had.

Maybe the 785G is just a stop gap before they release the 8xx series chipset ?
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X