AMD or Intel

.geek

Expert Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2005
Messages
3,622
Reaction score
0
Intel Core2 Duo E8200 - dual core 2.66ghz box cpu , with VT+TXT , 45nm , Lga775 , 1333mhz fsb - 2x64k L1+ shared 6mb L2 cache - with EDB , EiST, EM64T , WDE , ASC , SMA , ADMB, 128bit SSE4

ASUS P5N-D : support SLi , with EPU ( Energy Processing Unit ) , 8-phase cap-less Power , fanless heatpipe design ; two-slot thermal fanless design - for intel Lga775 Quad-core/ Core2/ Core2-Extreme/ p4/ Pentium-D cpu ; nVidia nForce750i SLi ( support EPP SLi memory , linkboost , FirstPacket ) , 1333/1066/800/533 fsb , 4x dual channel ddr2 800 ( upto 3.11v ) , 4 x s-ata2 with raid 0/1/5/0+1/10 , 1 x parallel ata133 , on-board 1988B 7.1 audio with coaxial+optical S/Pdif out + gigabit lan + ieee1394a + NV firewall ; 2x pci , 2 x pci-e(1x) , 2 x pci-e 16x ( 2 x pci-e 2.0 @ 16x+16x ) - bundled with 1 x asus add-on fan

Corsair TWIN2X2048-8500C5D , Dominator , with DHX technology , Nvidia SLi certrified with EPP , 2x1G/1024mb kit , ddr2-1066 ( pc2-8500 ) , CL5 , 5-5-5-15 , 2.1v , with heatsink - 240pin - lifetime warranty

XFX T88P-YDF/YHF , geforce 8800GT , SLi support , Pci-E 2.0 16x , 512mb 256bit DDR3 , support DirectX 10.0 + shader model 4.0 +FP32 HDR + 16x AA ; max resolution 2560x1600 , HDCP Compliant , RoPs : 16 , 57.6Gb/sec memory transfer , 112 stream processors @ 1.5Ghz ( pixel shader engine + vertex pipelines ) , core/memory : 600/1800mhz , 2 x dvi , HDTV tvout

OR

Amd socket AM2+ Phenomx4 Quad-core 9500 ( 2200mhz ) ; 4 x 128k L1 + 4 x 512k L2 + 1x shared 2mb L3 ; 65nm , 95w , 3600mhz HT3.0 link x 1 ( 20.8gb/sec ) , with PVT - box cpu

Asus M3N-HD/Hdmi ; socket AM2/AM2+ , support PCi-E2.0 SLi , Hybrid SLi , nVidia ESA ready , hypertransport 3.0 , 8+2 phase cap-less Power , fanless heatpipe design with 2 x memory heatpipe ; nVidia nForce750a SLi chipset , 4x dual channel DDR2-1066 ( upto 2.5v ) , 7 ( 6 internal+1 external e-sata ) s-ata2 with raid 0/1/0+1/5/10 , 1 x parallel ata133 , on-board , with HDMi AV output ( HD DVD , Blu-ray 1080p HDCP compliant ) + ieee1394 + Realtek ALC1200 7.1 digital audio with coaxial s/pdif out + gigabit lan + NV firewall ; 2x pci-e (1x) , 3 x Pci , 2 x pci-e 2.0 (16x) ( at 8x+8x ) , atx , 1 x PS2 only for kb

Corsair TWIN2X2048-8500C5D , Dominator , with DHX technology , Nvidia SLi certrified with EPP , 2x1G/1024mb kit , ddr2-1066 ( pc2-8500 ) , CL5 , 5-5-5-15 , 2.1v , with heatsink - 240pin - lifetime warranty

Asus EAH4850/HTDI/512M , HD4850 chipset , HDMi ready , support crossfire-X , built-in HDMi codec+7.1 audio , support DirectX 10.1 , 1080p HDCP Compliant , pci-e 2.0 x16 , 512mb 256bit 4 channel DDR3 , 800 stream processors ( pixel shader engine + vertex pipelines ) , core/memory : 625/1986mhz , dual dvi ( with 2 x dvi to d-sub + 1 x dvi to HDMi converter ) , HDTV+HDMi tv-out - full retail pack

If you had to choose, which would it be and why? :)

Alternatively, you can recommend similar components that would be better.

Thanks!
 
Last edited:
see what price difference is on 4870 and see if you can afford that if not 4850 just because im sick nvidia ripping us and having the market

look nothing really uses more than 2 cores, that amd is way slower than the e8200 and if you overclock the e8200 it kicks ass big time, i have the e8400 and it was a fast cpu so im sure the e8200 aint far behind it

whats the difference between the e8200 and q6600? i have seen it as low as 300 bucks
 
neither go cyrix :)

personally ill rather take a intel quad something. (big brother over my shoulder hehe can't really go surf around for stats)
 
remember, a dual/tri/quad is not faster than a single core, it can just handle more things at once. So if the pc is used for office and small games, a fast single core is better.
If you will be doing server type data, with lots of multi-tasking and hectic new age gaming, then more cores will come in handy.

when it comes to intel or amd, I have always believed Intel is more powerful for applications, but amd is faster for gaming.
 
I've always been an Intel fan but know a lot of people who run AMD's with no complaints
It's hard to tell these days... It used to be is it's more expensive, it's better but then when you think about the Nvidia/ATI saga, this isn't always the case
 
kevin amd used to be like but i can show plenty benchies that show intel rule in everything man

core 2 changed everything

gaming and applications it pomps amd
 
@ .geek - I have those exact Intel specs and all I can say is you wont be sorry! I am extremely happy with this setup and seriously couldn’t ask for more (ok I lie I want another 8800GT) ;)

I was a AMD/ATi man previously and decided to try Intel/Nvidia for a change this time around and I think I am converted. ;)
 
Take the Intel option but swap the 8800GT for a 4850, you don't have to put AMD with ATI. It is a better card for the same price.
 
Yea get a Xfire board.... When you have more cash get another hd4850 and you'll have a kick ass machine... Also rather get the e8400 than the e8200 (Price difference isnt that much)
 
yea but neither is the performance between e8200 and e8400

e8400 is more expensive than a q6600 so if your going to get an e8400 might as well get a q6600
 
As a amd fan i would say go AMD!!! But sadly intel is the better choice at the moment.with overclocking and standard performance:(
 
E8400 is cheaper than a Q6600... Dont know where u get your prices :)

Also the jump from e8200 to e8400 is only R200, where as the jump from e8400 to e8500 is R700+... ATM I would get the E8400 (If you want a dual core and not quad)

I thought the same thing with pricing, but E8400 pricing still seems a bit high whereas Q6600 is dropping. After the latest Intel price cuts get to SA we'll see.

The speed increase from E8200 to E8400 is almost more than from 8400 to 8500, so I don't see why not spend the extra R200.
 
yea just checked the q6600 is going for under 1.6k ex vat amazing (lets not go into the ex vat story plz im not an online retailer)

about 100 bucks difference between e8400 and q6600
 
Seems like IkonicIT has the most up to date prices then... Other people will probably follow... Id still get a E8400 over a Q6600...
 
kevin amd used to be like but i can show plenty benchies that show intel rule in everything man

core 2 changed everything

gaming and applications it pomps amd

Very true, killadoob!

I don't think AMD has fully recovered from the shock when Core2 got released.

Even Apple realised it's time to say goodbye to Motorola, if they wanted to stay competitive in the computer business.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for all the replies so far guys.

I'm not biased towards either AMD or Intel having used both in the past, each with their own pro's & cons.

I've heard a lot of good things about Intel over the last year (or more), but I've also been made aware of the slightly lower cost in the AMD / ATI combination of graphics and CPU.

Quad core definitely is not something I require. If I'm playing games, I'm not running anything else on my PC. That's my number one requirement and use of my PC. I have a laptop for work and a PS3 as my other gaming platform / media server. I'm just a die hard PC gamer.

I'm really surprised at the low cost of RAM currently. Quite amazing in fact.

Regarding either of those motherboards: do you have any other recommendations? :)
 
@ .geek - I have those exact Intel specs and all I can say is you wont be sorry! I am extremely happy with this setup and seriously couldn’t ask for more (ok I lie I want another 8800GT) ;)

I was a AMD/ATi man previously and decided to try Intel/Nvidia for a change this time around and I think I am converted. ;)

Thanks for the reply Grimspoon. Nice to hear you're happy with a setup I'm contemplating getting. I assume you play games? If so which? :)
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X