Not if you are a journalist. The are exempt because of Freedom of the Press. If a journalist interviews a soldier in the midst of a war who says "I am going to shoot some of the enemy who just happen to be citizens of your country" ... is that that journalists responsibility to put down the camera and pick up a gun and fight that soldier? Or is it his job to report the news? Why do journalists have certain rights of exclusivity or non-alignment during war... but now that they report a certain aspect of the "war on crime" they no longer have that right of non-alignment?
They are bound by a duty to report news to the public. That does not make them participants in that news, only objective reporters. It is in the public interest to get objective news and impartial news. How can we trust the news to be impartial if we expect the journalists to take sides and to be doing the job of crime-fighting at the same time?
Where did I say they should drop their camera and fight them ?
We arent talking about journalists coming across a scene in Afghanistan. We are talking about common criminals being interviewed in a house who are plotting to commit a crime.
How would you feel if a journalist was told by some thug that tomorrow he was going to highjack someone on the highway and then you discover that someone you care about has been highjacked by that criminal ???