Well then maybe you should go somewhere where you are local. As a non-local you're not really in a position to complain about how the locals won't leave you alone to live your life in their country.
-
Join the MyBroadband community
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
-
Question of the Day: Will you be watching the FIFA World Cup Final?
Another race attack at top university
- Thread starter Redeemed
- Start date
Well then maybe you should go somewhere where you are local. As a non-local you're not really in a position to complain about how the locals won't leave you alone to live your life in their country.
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
Huh? What stats? I haven't posted any. I'm trying to ascertain where Drunkard's stats come from. That's all. When asked he keeps trying to be evasive and turns the question around without answering. He says the same place I get mine from. So I can only assume that it's econometrix if he's somehow been able to psychicly deduce as such...
Thanks I'm not psychic that's why I had to ask.
Drunkard #1
Expert Member
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2007
- Messages
- 3,668
- Reaction score
- 18
That's your solution. Why don't we rather remove the "problem", like the police did in the article I posted.
No you haven't, but you're thinking "those numbers can't be right" without anything to back up your claims, so why should I have to back up mine? Asking for stats in a country where it's probably illegal to gather those sort of stats is argumentative, so I don't see why I can't be evasive. It's called empirical evidence. Look it up.
"their county", because the majority arrived here before the white man? Or are you referring to the Bushman? Because everyone else arrived at roughly the same time.
Africans didn't force you or your forebears to come here. You knew they were the majority here.
Wait, what the actual fsck?! You make assertions, then when asked to back them up you move the burden of proof to others to disprove. You also admit that the stats are not available, then claim that it is empirical evidence. Then tell me to look it up myself, assume my position on the matter, berate me for not backing up my own stats that I haven't even remotely inferred to, claim you don't have to back your stats up, and claim that being evasive about direct questions is perfectly acceptable.
All because I asked one simple question: where do your stats come from.
Do you not understand what a complete moron you're coming across as? You've just gone full racist retard...
All because I asked one simple question: where do your stats come from.
Do you not understand what a complete moron you're coming across as? You've just gone full racist retard...
No. "Their country" as in the locals country
You are the one claimed not to be local, not me.
In South Africa, I'm a local, a white South African local.
You would also be a local but you've disowned yourself as you don't consider yourself a local.
Drunkard #1
Expert Member
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2007
- Messages
- 3,668
- Reaction score
- 18
Yes, I made assertions. No they can't be proven (or refuted). You asked for stats that you know don't exist, or do you think us racists waste time collecting stats to confirm our majority to lefty liberals? We don't care what you think, or that you question our "stats". And I meant that you to look up the definition of empirical evidence, because you clearly don't know what it means. Don't try bull**** me by twisting my claims, that just reinforces my contempt for your posts. I know what I said, and it isn't what you're implying.
Drunkard #1
Expert Member
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2007
- Messages
- 3,668
- Reaction score
- 18
You made the claim, the onus is on you to substantiate that claim with facts.
You know full well that those stats can't be gathered here. Why ask for them. The best that anyone can provide are projections from empirical evidence, and mine say that I'm right. And I never said that they were stats. DJ.. did.
HideInLight
Expert Member
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2006
- Messages
- 4,600
- Reaction score
- 1,061
What exactly was he trying to accomplish? Why not just get the plate number and call the police...
edit:
Sigh, just lock them up.
Last edited:
OrbitalDawn
Ulysses Everett McGill
What empirical evidence? You've provided exactly zilch.
Look at you getting all huffy, and puffing your chest out like a baboon because I asked you one simple little question. ONE QUESTION! You made an assertion that you know you cannot back up. You admit this. Yet get all aggressive and full of schit because that is pointed out. And no, I don't think that you racists spend your time collecting stats. It requires more than a handful of synaptic connections to do so and you certainly don't display such physiology. You lot rather spend your time gathering tinned food and ammo, and creating as much hate as possible to justify your simple-baboon-logic about others. It's a pity that you can't actually have a decent conversation about your hatred. Instead you make bullschit claims and get all pissy when they're questioned.
Empirical evidence is a very big word for someone who doesn't quite understand empirical evidence himself. You have no empirical results to use to back up your claims. Your claims are nothing more than just that. They are not founded in empirical evidence-based observations. (Apologies for the multi-syllabled words here - have someone read this post back to you slowly if you're having trouble).
And where did I twist anything? I simply asked you where your stats came from, because you were posting specifics. You posted numbers. I suspected that you sucked them out of your super-white-bleached arsehole, but had to confirm, hence the question. The burden of proof in empirical science falls on your hairy shoulders, not mine. Seems you're actually the one who needs a lesson on empirical science. Again, ask someone to teach you. Perhaps someone from your broederbond actually managed to pass matric, and they'll hopefully be able to explain this to you. Slowly. And repeatedly.
As for contempt of my posts, I swear I really couldn't care less about the opinion of someone who displays the cognitive abilities of our ancestral monkeys. No sweat off my back. Treat this one with as much contempt as you like. It won't make you any more right. Unless you now have more stats to suck out of your naught to prove why you're right and everyone else is just a lefty liberal. Seems if people don't agree with you, they're a lefty liberal. No room for additional space in that brain there, hey? Pity. Evolution didn't treat all lineages equally, it seems. Donate yourself to science, please. Perhaps you'll overhear a conversation about empirical science while you're at it and have a light-bulb* moment.
* A light-bulb being the things you switch on in your bunker when it gets too dark to see properly. How many in your troop does it take to replace one btw?
Please provide the empirical results that show your extrapolations relating to white South Africans. Please show your work. Data acquisition, analysis, methodologies etc...
Drunkard #1
Expert Member
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2007
- Messages
- 3,668
- Reaction score
- 18
There you go again, demanding that my evidence be scientifically rigorous. It isn't, as you well know, but decided to ask anyway. But here's a stat for you: The FF+ got 0.83% of the vote in the last election. Extrapolating that to the entire population yields a number of 440 000. Add a percentage of DA voters that are with me, you've got a number, since precise numbers are so important to you.
Now answer this (And I'm going to keep asking until you do, becoming more and more insulting as I go. Wonder where I picked that up from.), what does the future hold for those half million people? Should we sent to re-education camps? Do you want half a million people forced into the sea? Or can we just be left the **** alone and free from lefty liberals and natives?
And regarding your previous post (which has been reported), I can assure you that my IQ is high, even when compared to university campuses, where I obtained my two degrees. What do you have to back up your alleged intellectual superiority?
If you're going to post assertions without facts then don't get all pissy and evasive when people call you on it. And don't try turn it around. You keep posting about empirical science yet you haven't got the foggiest idea what exactly it entails. You demonstrate utter stupidity in this department.
You now also claim that all FF+ voters are racists. Please provide your stats to back this up. You also assert that a percentage of DA supporters are racist and suck a number from thin air. You're using this within the framework of providing evidence.
Think. Engage more than first gear in the cranial department. You're proving my point with every post. All that you're posting is complete tripe, sucked from your arsehole, to justify your hatred of blacks. Your position is not empirical. It is the very antipathy of empirical science.
Oh and earlier you claimed it was the majority of white South Africans who shared your view. Now it's only half a million? Stick with one bit of bullschit at a time. As for what you do with yourselves, the country no longer belongs to you. And that's a good thing. So kindly fsck off elsewhere if you hate living with blacks so much. Nobody will bat an eyelid. Please, arrange your passports and piss off. You're not going to find many places to go, so perhaps the sea is the better place for you lot? I truly don't care. FIFO.
And I see we've now appealing to authority. Lol. You've pulled nearly every fallacious argument, and every excuse out already. In just a few posts. Hilarious...
You now also claim that all FF+ voters are racists. Please provide your stats to back this up. You also assert that a percentage of DA supporters are racist and suck a number from thin air. You're using this within the framework of providing evidence.
Think. Engage more than first gear in the cranial department. You're proving my point with every post. All that you're posting is complete tripe, sucked from your arsehole, to justify your hatred of blacks. Your position is not empirical. It is the very antipathy of empirical science.
Oh and earlier you claimed it was the majority of white South Africans who shared your view. Now it's only half a million? Stick with one bit of bullschit at a time. As for what you do with yourselves, the country no longer belongs to you. And that's a good thing. So kindly fsck off elsewhere if you hate living with blacks so much. Nobody will bat an eyelid. Please, arrange your passports and piss off. You're not going to find many places to go, so perhaps the sea is the better place for you lot? I truly don't care. FIFO.
And I see we've now appealing to authority. Lol. You've pulled nearly every fallacious argument, and every excuse out already. In just a few posts. Hilarious...
Last edited:
porchrat
Honorary Master
Speak for yourself you racist whackjob. :erm:
Mila
Honorary Master
Joh, seems like each province has a few looney a around. Lock them up. Will do them good.. I think ( after the waterkloof thing I wonder if crimals can be rehabilitated)