Another race attack at top university

[Drunkard #1]

If you're going to post assertions without facts then don't get all pissy and evasive when people call you on it. And don't try turn it around. You keep posting about empirical science yet you haven't got the foggiest idea what exactly it entails. You demonstrate utter stupidity in this department.

You now also claim that all FF+ voters are racists. Please provide your stats to back this up. You also assert that a percentage of DA supporters are racist and suck a number from thin air. You're using this within the framework of providing evidence.

Think. Engage more than first gear in the cranial department. You're proving my point with every post. All that you're posting is complete tripe, sucked from your arsehole, to justify your hatred of blacks. Your position is not empirical. It is the very antipathy of empirical science.

Oh and earlier you claimed it was the majority of white South Africans who shared your view. Now it's only half a million? Stick with one bit of bullschit at a time. As for what you do with yourselves, the country no longer belongs to you. And that's a good thing. So kindly fsck off elsewhere if you hate living with blacks so much. Nobody will bat an eyelid. Please, arrange your passports and piss off. You're not going to find many places to go, so perhaps the sea is the better place for you lot? I truly don't care. FIFO.

And I see we've now appealing to authority. Lol. You've pulled nearly every fallacious argument, and every excuse out already. In just a few posts. Hilarious...

Let me summarise your post, since I will not address anything you raise until you answer my questions, and provide evidence for the claims you've made.

Avoiding my questions. Diverting attention. Twisting what I said. Appealing to some "universal truth". Outright lies. Trying to out bull**** me.

Joh, seems like each province has a few looney a around. Lock them up. Will do them good.. I think ( after the waterkloof thing I wonder if crimals can be rehabilitated)

Should everyone that disagrees with you be locked up?

 

[Mila]

Huh?

If the shoe fits....

 

[DJ...]

What evidence for what claims? I've made no claims. You have. Hence why I asked for your stats. Jesus Christ, how do you function on this planet that requires breathing and other actions at the same time...?

 

[DJ...]

And where did I divert attention, or twist your words, or appeal to a universal truth? Projection much, little man?

 

[DJ...]

Anyways. You're boring. You cannot prove your claims. You talk complete schit. You are as racist and insulting as hell in other threads but take great exception when it's directed back at you. You use every fallacious argument under the sun. And then make daft accusations of others for asking one simple, direct question.

You are as transparent as you wish your skin colour was. A hateful little bullschitter with nothing but lies to use to justify yourself. Please, just leave if you cannot stand living with 99% of the population of this country. Just go. Nobody will give a schit...

 

[DJ...]

You bored or something?
You must have wasted about 10 000 words on a nothing person.

I am. Nothing to do this afternoon...

 

[zippy]

Us conservatives have most of the guns, and there are a ****load of us, so we'll expand that corner quickly enough, and boot out who we don't like.

yeah, but you are also quite thick. My memories of your last stupid attempts are those fat idiots invading Bop in their clapped out bakkies. We all know how well that went for you.....

Its fun watching you lot make total tit of yourselves

 

[Drunkard #1]

What evidence for what claims? I've made no claims. You have. Hence why I asked for your stats. Jesus Christ, how do you function on this planet that requires breathing and other actions at the same time...?

Anyways. You're boring. You cannot prove your claims. You talk complete schit. You are as racist and insulting as hell in other threads but take great exception when it's directed back at you. You use every fallacious argument under the sun. And then make daft accusations of others for asking one simple, direct question.

You are as transparent as you wish your skin colour was. A hateful little bullschitter with nothing but lies to use to justify yourself. Please, just leave if you cannot stand living with 99% of the population of this country. Just go. Nobody will give a schit...

And where did I divert attention, or twist your words, or appeal to a universal truth? Projection much, little man?

I assumed you were thick, you know, since you've clearly got your head stuck up your arse, but I didn't think illiterate.

since I will not address anything you raise until you answer my questions, and provide evidence for the claims you've made.

I will not respond to your gibberish, until you substantiate your claims.

If I had your brain, I wouldn't waste that much time talking to morons who can't learn.

You should know how to deal with goading by now.

Yeah, with his brain he could be digging holes, or if he applies himself, stacking bricks.

 

[Fudzy]

Now, now, let's try keep this civil.

 

[Mila]

I assumed you were thick, you know, since you've clearly got your head stuck up your arse, but I didn't think illiterate.



I will not respond to your gibberish, until you substantiate your claims.



Yeah, with his brain he could be digging holes, or if he applies himself, stacking bricks.

 

[Bar0n]

No you haven't, but you're thinking "those numbers can't be right" without anything to back up your claims, so why should I have to back up mine?

Onus probandi incumbit ei qui dicit, non ei qui negat.

 

[Drunkard #1]

Now, now, let's try keep this civil.

Where was "let's try keep this civil" when DJ.. posted #75? I just took a leaf out of his book.

View attachment 101163

What a well thought out post. It really contributes to the thread. If my translation is correct, I take it to mean "I'm exercising my womanly right to not know what the **** is going on, but stick up for my boyfriend anyway".

Onus probandi incumbit ei qui dicit, non ei qui negat.

I caught onus. Are you saying the onus is on me? Honestly, I have no clue - I was never taught dead languages.

Anyway, no it isn't, because he wasn't looking for proof of anything. His entire tantrum was designed to undermine my opinion. It failed because I can spot a bull****ter at 1000 paces. He has no proof to refute my claims, nor any claims of his own, but obsessed over my thumb-suck estimate (which is as good an estimate as you'll find anywhere) to divert attention from this fact. He disagrees with me and the estimate I made, but refuses to even offer an alternative, for fear of called out on it. It was nothing more than a cowardly attack, and I treated it with the contempt it deserved.

 

[Fudzy]

Anyway, no it isn't, because he wasn't looking for proof of anything. His entire tantrum was designed to undermine my opinion. It failed because I can spot a bull****ter at 1000 paces. He has no proof to refute my claims, nor any claims of his own, but obsessed over my thumb-suck estimate (which is as good an estimate as you'll find anywhere) to divert attention from this fact. He disagrees with me and the estimate I made, but refuses to even offer an alternative, for fear of called out on it. It was nothing more than a cowardly attack, and I treated it with the contempt it deserved.

And your response in #90? How is DJ supposed to answer a question you never asked?

 

[Ninja'd]

If my translation is correct, I take it to mean "I'm exercising my womanly right to not know what the **** is going on, but stick up for my boyfriend anyway".

And sexist too.

 

[Maverick Jester]

Drunkard #1 making baseless claims and then shifting the burden of proof onto others? Wow, I am shocked, I have never seen that happen before

 

[Bar0n]

I caught onus. Are you saying the onus is on me? Honestly, I have no clue - I was never taught dead languages.

This "dead" language is the foundation of civilisation, science, and law.

It means: "The burden of proof is on the person who makes the claim, not on the person who denies or questions the claim."

 

[Sherbang]

Now, now, let's try keep this civil.

Unfortunately there is nothing civil about this thread or this case. It's difficult to have a civil discussion when the topic itself is so rude and uncivil!

 

[Drunkard #1]

And your response in #90? How is DJ supposed to answer a question you never asked?

I'm asking for proof that I know doesn't exist, see, I'm following DJ..'s lead. Here are some unsubstantiated claims that I want proof for.

You lot rather spend your time gathering tinned food and ammo, and creating as much hate as possible to justify your simple-baboon-logic about others. It's a pity that you can't actually have a decent conversation about your hatred. Instead you make bullschit claims and get all pissy when they're questioned.

You're not going to find many places to go, so perhaps the sea is the better place for you lot?

Please, just leave if you cannot stand living with 99% of the population of this country.

You're certainly not speaking on behalf of white people, that's for sure...

And here's the questions I asked.

Now answer this (And I'm going to keep asking until you do, becoming more and more insulting as I go. Wonder where I picked that up from.), what does the future hold for those half million people? Should we sent to re-education camps? Do you want half a million people forced into the sea? Or can we just be left the **** alone and free from lefty liberals and natives?

And regarding your previous post (which has been reported), I can assure you that my IQ is high, even when compared to university campuses, where I obtained my two degrees. What do you have to back up your alleged intellectual superiority?

And sexist too.

Damn straight. I'm not going to pretend there are no statistically significant differences between the sexes for the sake of being politically correct.

This "dead" language is the foundation of civilisation, science, and law.

It means: "The burden of proof is on the person who makes the claim, not on the person who denies or questions the claim."

Well, good for you. You're a scholar of history and dead languages. I'll stick to the real world, as it exists today, thanks.

 

[Bar0n]

Damn straight. I'm not going to pretend there are no statistically significant differences between the sexes for the sake of being politically correct.

What's your stance on homosexuality?

 

[Bar0n]

Well, good for you. You're a scholar of history and dead languages. I'll stick to the real world, as it exists today, thanks.

You seem slightly out of touch with the real world.