konfab
Honorary Master
The problem is that EVs are good at less things than ICE cars whilst costing substantially more.Those "shortcomings" are only shortcomings in some use cases though. Which is my point.
You're speaking as though your use case is the only legitimate one. It's not.
Which means that if you want to do the things that EV cars are not good at, you need an entirely separate care or you will go insane.
What you are missing out is that this impacts everyone who uses these cars, because people buy and sell cars in secondary markets.
Take my old Toyota Aygo. It was by all means a city car. Designed for the streets of Europe.
Not particularly fantastic for longer distances due to the smol engine. Yet it still did the job perfectly fine, and you can still take advantage of the very low fuel economy to save money.
When I sold it, I could appeal to two buyers. One who wanted it for city, and one who wanted a cheap car with low running costs. More buyers mean higher prices.
Even the opposite is true. If you have a big 4x4 like a Pajero, it can still function perfectly decently in a city (being able to run over vagrants , whilst being really nice on the highway.
EVS don't have this. They work well in cities and that is it. So *****shocker******, they depreciate like milk because you are missing out potential buyers for your second hand car.
https://restofworld.org/2025/ev-depreciation-blusmart-collapse/A U.K.-based study found 3-year-old EVs lost more than half of their value compared with 39% for gas cars. Another study conducted by Boucar Diouf, an EV researcher and professor at Kyung Hee University in Seoul, found EVs in the U.S. can lose as much as 60% of their value over three to five years, compared with less than half for traditional vehicles.
This is another what you are not considering, the biggest cost with EVs is the depreciation.