Article Mistake corrections


Hi there,

As far as I understand, and after double-checking online, summonsed refers to the serving of a summons, while summoned is to "authoritatively call on someone".

summons
ˈsʌm(ə)nz/Submit
verbLAW
past tense: summonsed; past participle: summonsed
serve (someone) with a summons.
"he has been summonsed to appear in court next month"
synonyms: serve with a summons, summon, cite, serve with a citation, serve with a writ, subpoena
"he had been summonsed to appear in court"
 
Hi there,

As far as I understand, and after double-checking online, summonsed refers to the serving of a summons, while summoned is to "authoritatively call on someone".

summons
ˈsʌm(ə)nz/Submit
verbLAW
past tense: summonsed; past participle: summonsed
serve (someone) with a summons.
"he has been summonsed to appear in court next month"
synonyms: serve with a summons, summon, cite, serve with a citation, serve with a writ, subpoena
"he had been summonsed to appear in court"

summons is a noun; summon a verb. So John is right. Read here:

http://www.lawprose.org/blog/?p=2695
 
summons
ˈsʌm(ə)nz/Submit
verbLAW
past tense: summonsed; past participle: summonsed
serve (someone) with a summons.
"he has been summonsed to appear in court next month"
synonyms: serve with a summons, summon, cite, serve with a citation, serve with a writ, subpoena
"he had been summonsed to appear in court"

Although summonsed isn’t downright wrong, in modern legal usage it’s much preferable to say that someone was summoned to appear in court.
 
summons
ˈsʌm(ə)nz/Submit
verbLAW
past tense: summonsed; past participle: summonsed
serve (someone) with a summons.
"he has been summonsed to appear in court next month"
synonyms: serve with a summons, summon, cite, serve with a citation, serve with a writ, subpoena
"he had been summonsed to appear in court"

Although summonsed isn’t downright wrong, in modern legal usage it’s much preferable to say that someone was summoned to appear in court.

Thanks, was just about to post that it is outdated.
 
You failed to amend the use of "it's" which means "it is" and not "it has".



FTFY.

It doesn't mean only it is. It's can be it has - as a contraction, all the rules were followed.

I remember a former client for whom I did editing work was adamant that it's was never used - she always wanted it written out as it was, it is and it has - for this very reason.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X