iAmThePope
Senior Member
Ironically, some of us that want you all to stop because we've seen the harm/death it brings...![]()
Thats a perfectly rational statement. Saying smokers should die quickly and the hope we get cancer is not.
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Ironically, some of us that want you all to stop because we've seen the harm/death it brings...![]()
That's a statement that you can't prove. We're one of the most obese countries in the world, so I could argue that obesity is also a strain on the health system. Yet I don't see any calls to ban McD's or Steers.
It's a logical, your 14% would be taken off something else you'd spend your money on, so the sin tax is the only thing that applies. Do you really think the small amount you pay per pack really out weighs the R100 000s your medical bill will cost?
ROFL since when will government pay for the medical bills? There is no mention of a trust fund being created out of sin tax to solemnly go for the good of smokers, my God you fall for propaganda.
When did I say the sin tax went to hospitals? The comparision was that the amount of money the sin tax generates does not contribute to the system more than the hospital bills take from the system. Smoking BURDENS the system more than it CONRIBUTES (or in SA, is stolen by Zuma).
Better way to think of it:
Can that R100 000 bill spend on chemo be spent elsewhere better? Yes.
lol and you believe that government knows best where government should spend that money? The money going to nicotine contributes to job creation, the money going to medical bills contribute to medical research all in all we might one day have way to smoke and also cure it instantaneously!
the money going to medical bills contribute to medical research
Apply whatever you said to those who are obese as well. As with any insurance scheme, those at a higher risk pay a higher premium. You're not paying more than you would have otherwise.Lol, you think medical bills fund research? That's cute.
In most cases medical aid pays for it, so medical aids have to raise the prices, so you are costing alot of people alot more.
Who pays those bills when someone who can't afford it/not coverd is rushed into emergancy?
Have stoke, use an entire emergancy team's time and focus... time that could have been spent helping someone else.
Apply whatever you said to those who are obese as well.
As with any insurance scheme, those at a higher risk pay a higher premium. You're not paying more than you would have otherwise.
It's amazing the justifications the addicts have for their addictions.
The new bill states that "smoking sections" in pubs and restuarants will be outlawed. Also places like cigar lounges will be outlawed.
Law no. 1 of smoking: Never argue with a smoker that it's bad for them coz they don't get the reasoning![]()
we can see how reasonable you are when someone tries to take away something you love![]()
Scat?
Must be annoying then relying on a variety of chemicals to stay alive.Do you like being a slave to a chemical?
I don't.
My medical aid never enquired as to if myself or my missus were smokers when we enrolled, or subsequently.Apply whatever you said to those who are obese as well. As with any insurance scheme, those at a higher risk pay a higher premium. You're not paying more than you would have otherwise.
iAmThePope said:Is it just me or do all the non-smokers who go on about us smokers making them pay more for medical aid and that doctors and nurses waste their times on us sound very very unjust? You are implying that you, as a non-smoker, is a better person and should be treated better than those of us who smoke? Seriously? Screw equality then eh
2012 said:Having said that, I agree that smokers are entitled to benefit from the healthcare system as much as anyone else - thats what it's there for.