just to clarify your statement
wow just wow
No, that's your spin on it, making it seem as if he says if you don't agree with whatever he says then you are wrong, rather than a specific subject, in this case censorship.
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
just to clarify your statement
wow just wow
Actually he has a point here. Either you want opinions you don't like censored (not a free society - in many respects a theocracy) or you don't (a free society).just to clarify your statement
wow just wow
Is the guy calling for everyone to tolerate the views and opinions of others the president of Iran?is copa by chance the president of Iran ?
Either you support this particular censorship or not. There's no middle ground.
If you do (and by you, I mean anyone), you can get ****ed in my opinion. Go live in a theocracy and leave the rest of us the **** alone.![]()
just to clarify your statement
wow just wow
Why cant there be middle ground ? Why does it have to be black and white ? Like hate groups or racist's groups. Should they be allowed to say discriminating things ? So sure we allow freedom of speech and I fully agree and support it but is it really okay for the AWB to call non whites ******irs ? Or the KKK calling "blacks" **groes ?
Why cant there be middle ground ? Why does it have to be black and white ? Like hate groups or racist's groups. Should they be allowed to say discriminating things ? So sure we allow freedom of speech and I fully agree and support it but is it really okay for the AWB to call non whites ******irs ? Or the KKK calling "blacks" **groes ?
The Christians in my area also got hysterical with the Monster energy drink cans. Theyre going around in some of the Churches saying the Monster logo is actually the sign of the beast and stupid things like that. Whats interesting is its actually driving some ardent moderate Christians away from the rabid crazies. This is a good thing. The more real Christians(tm) stand up to the crazies the more seriously people can take their beliefs. When the crazies make faith look foolish no one takes what they say seriously.
LOL so you want people to stand by and take their freedom of expression? No sorry not going to happen.lol I give up started trolling this thread, seems like there is no end
you want freedom of speech but then want shut others when they disagree with what you say.
Easy - you choose the view that doesn't censor.as public broadcaster you have a problem you have 2 opposing view points. how do you choose which to listen to ?
lol I give up started trolling this thread, seems like there is no end
you want freedom of speech but then want shut others when they disagree with what you say.
as public broadcaster you have a problem you have 2 opposing view points. how do you choose which to listen to ?
I think he is mad that we won't be tolerant of views demanding intolerance... which is just plain weird.Who has said this? If you pay attention, you will notice we are all saying the complete opposite. :wtf:
you want freedom of speech but then want shut others when they disagree with what you say.
I think he is mad that we won't be tolerant of views demanding intolerance... which is just plain weird.
Let Jesus complain if he feels offended.
Fair point actually. Nobody is calling for censorship on our 'anti-censorship side' (for lack of a better term).Of course we are tolerating them. No one is forcing him to keep quiet and not air his views in complete freedom. Again, it's a very peculiar expectation of special treatment of some sort.![]()
To tolerate something is to permit it or to endure it with liberality, forbearance or indulgence.
To not tolerate something is basically the opposite. To not permit it, to not endure it with liberality, forbearance or indulgence.
Basically:
tolerance = free society
intolerance = Iran
You can state your opinion but you can't insist that someone else's opinion not be allowed to be heard in the public arena. No you don't have that right at all.
If you think you do please point it out in the Constitution... I'm guesing it would be something along the lines of "the right to restrict the free speech of others". Having read the Bill of Rights multiple times I don't believe I ever noticed that section.
When porn is broadcast on public access television it is done so in the early hours of the morning. Unless you are a family of bats you don't need to worry about your kids seeing it. If your kids are seeing it then frankly porn on TV is the least of your parenting worries.
If porn were being shown in the middle of the day then you would have a point. Luckily it isn't because we have regulatory bodies preventing that. Yay for rational approaches to things that don't infringe on people's liberties!!... as opposed to Iran!
Then move to Iran. Otherwise if you want to live in a free society then join the rest of us in tolerance realising that you cannot dictate your morality to the rest of us.
Why should people in a free society stand by and let that freedom be undermined by idiots that want to stifle all stances they don't agree with?
Now this I am perfectly cool with. By all means oppose it.Granted probably bad choice of words then , I retract the word tolerate to I will oppose anyone speaking against my religion.
When you said:Now where have I insisted on anything remotely like that ?
That is what I was responding to.Even if I did call for censorship , would that not be my democratic right ?
Moving something to another timeslot isn't really censorship. Censorship suppresses information. It doens't just invovle shifting it around a little.Seriously ? It was a what if situation and the likely of it happening has no relevance , I was pointing out in the event that porn would be shown on public TV I would oppose it and call for censorship. Let me rather say then , in the event that hardcore porn will be shown in the day between 08H00 and 20H00 I would oppose it and call for censorship.
Of course you can state that you disagree. Once again though that isn't what you said. You said you wanted your kid to grow up in an environment with your sense of morality.The irony ! LOL. So I cannot state that I disagree with your version of freedom of speech ? and If I do then I should move away ? Nice choices I have in this free world you live in. By the way , why do you have such an obsession with Iran ?