Article: Red Bull ad offensive

just to clarify your statement

wow just wow

No, that's your spin on it, making it seem as if he says if you don't agree with whatever he says then you are wrong, rather than a specific subject, in this case censorship.
 
just to clarify your statement

wow just wow
Actually he has a point here. Either you want opinions you don't like censored (not a free society - in many respects a theocracy) or you don't (a free society).

The former means you don't recognise the right to free speech the latter does. I find anyone that holds the former to be a threat to the freedom of our country. Don't attempt to impose your beliefs and morality on me. Anyone who wants to can go fsck himself/herself.

Learn to tolerate other points of view even if you don't like them or move to Iran.
 
Either you support this particular censorship or not. There's no middle ground.

If you do (and by you, I mean anyone), you can get ****ed in my opinion. Go live in a theocracy and leave the rest of us the **** alone. :D

Why cant there be middle ground ? Why does it have to be black and white ? Like hate groups or racist's groups. Should they be allowed to say discriminating things ? So sure we allow freedom of speech and I fully agree and support it but is it really okay for the AWB to call non whites ******irs ? Or the KKK calling "blacks" **groes ?
 
Why cant there be middle ground ? Why does it have to be black and white ? Like hate groups or racist's groups. Should they be allowed to say discriminating things ? So sure we allow freedom of speech and I fully agree and support it but is it really okay for the AWB to call non whites ******irs ? Or the KKK calling "blacks" **groes ?

In this particular case, is what I said. There is indeed room for a great deal of nuance when it come to these issues in general, which is why open conversation is important, but in this instance, either you support this censorship, or you do not.
 
Why cant there be middle ground ? Why does it have to be black and white ? Like hate groups or racist's groups. Should they be allowed to say discriminating things ? So sure we allow freedom of speech and I fully agree and support it but is it really okay for the AWB to call non whites ******irs ? Or the KKK calling "blacks" **groes ?

Because there isn't a middle ground on this issue.

And your examples are Hate Speech, which is covered in the constitution.
 
lol I give up started trolling this thread, seems like there is no end
you want freedom of speech but then want shut others when they disagree with what you say.
as public broadcaster you have a problem you have 2 opposing view points. how do you choose which to listen to ?
 
The Christians in my area also got hysterical with the Monster energy drink cans. Theyre going around in some of the Churches saying the Monster logo is actually the sign of the beast and stupid things like that. Whats interesting is its actually driving some ardent moderate Christians away from the rabid crazies. This is a good thing. The more real Christians(tm) stand up to the crazies the more seriously people can take their beliefs. When the crazies make faith look foolish no one takes what they say seriously.

OMG! leave Monster alone :cry: i live on that stuff
 
lol I give up started trolling this thread, seems like there is no end
you want freedom of speech but then want shut others when they disagree with what you say.
LOL so you want people to stand by and take their freedom of expression? No sorry not going to happen.

Why should people in a free society stand by and let that freedom be undermined by idiots that want to stifle all stances they don't agree with?


as public broadcaster you have a problem you have 2 opposing view points. how do you choose which to listen to ?
Easy - you choose the view that doesn't censor.
 
lol I give up started trolling this thread, seems like there is no end
you want freedom of speech but then want shut others when they disagree with what you say.
as public broadcaster you have a problem you have 2 opposing view points. how do you choose which to listen to ?

Who has said this? If you pay attention, you will notice we are all saying the complete opposite. :wtf:
 
I think he is mad that we won't be tolerant of views demanding intolerance... which is just plain weird.

Of course we are tolerating them. No one is forcing him to keep quiet and not air his views in complete freedom. Again, it's a very peculiar expectation of special treatment of some sort. :confused:
 
Of course we are tolerating them. No one is forcing him to keep quiet and not air his views in complete freedom. Again, it's a very peculiar expectation of special treatment of some sort. :confused:
Fair point actually. Nobody is calling for censorship on our 'anti-censorship side' (for lack of a better term).
 
To tolerate something is to permit it or to endure it with liberality, forbearance or indulgence.

To not tolerate something is basically the opposite. To not permit it, to not endure it with liberality, forbearance or indulgence.

Basically:
tolerance = free society
intolerance = Iran


Granted probably bad choice of words then , I retract the word tolerate to I will oppose anyone speaking against my religion.




You can state your opinion but you can't insist that someone else's opinion not be allowed to be heard in the public arena. No you don't have that right at all.

If you think you do please point it out in the Constitution... I'm guesing it would be something along the lines of "the right to restrict the free speech of others". Having read the Bill of Rights multiple times I don't believe I ever noticed that section.

Now where have I insisted on anything remotely like that ?

When porn is broadcast on public access television it is done so in the early hours of the morning. Unless you are a family of bats you don't need to worry about your kids seeing it. If your kids are seeing it then frankly porn on TV is the least of your parenting worries.

If porn were being shown in the middle of the day then you would have a point. Luckily it isn't because we have regulatory bodies preventing that. Yay for rational approaches to things that don't infringe on people's liberties!!... as opposed to Iran!

Seriously ? It was a what if situation and the likely of it happening has no relevance , I was pointing out in the event that porn would be shown on public TV I would oppose it and call for censorship. Let me rather say then , in the event that hardcore porn will be shown in the day between 08H00 and 20H00 I would oppose it and call for censorship.



Then move to Iran. Otherwise if you want to live in a free society then join the rest of us in tolerance realising that you cannot dictate your morality to the rest of us.

The irony ! LOL. So I cannot state that I disagree with your version of freedom of speech ? and If I do then I should move away ? Nice choices I have in this free world you live in. By the way , why do you have such an obsession with Iran ?
 
Why should people in a free society stand by and let that freedom be undermined by idiots that want to stifle all stances they don't agree with?

Do I understand this correctly ? Are you saying in simple terms then you should not let and I quote "idiots" speak out/oppose/disagree with your opinions wrt to freedom of speech ?
 
Granted probably bad choice of words then , I retract the word tolerate to I will oppose anyone speaking against my religion.
Now this I am perfectly cool with. By all means oppose it.


Now where have I insisted on anything remotely like that ?
When you said:
Even if I did call for censorship , would that not be my democratic right ?
That is what I was responding to.


Seriously ? It was a what if situation and the likely of it happening has no relevance , I was pointing out in the event that porn would be shown on public TV I would oppose it and call for censorship. Let me rather say then , in the event that hardcore porn will be shown in the day between 08H00 and 20H00 I would oppose it and call for censorship.
Moving something to another timeslot isn't really censorship. Censorship suppresses information. It doens't just invovle shifting it around a little.


The irony ! LOL. So I cannot state that I disagree with your version of freedom of speech ? and If I do then I should move away ? Nice choices I have in this free world you live in. By the way , why do you have such an obsession with Iran ?
Of course you can state that you disagree. Once again though that isn't what you said. You said you wanted your kid to grow up in an environment with your sense of morality.

If what you want is to have your kid grow up in an environment with nothing but your sense of morality around then know that in a free society that is basically impossible. You must tolerate the views of others. If you want to have your kid grow up in an environment consisting of nothing but your morality then move to Iran.

The reason I have such an obsession with Iran is because it is one place that enforces by law one strict sense of morality. One view. It then brutally oppresses and crushes all other opinions and views. It is the opposite of a free society. It is where people that want censorship of things they disagree with should go. It doesn't have to be Iran specifically, you can pick any other brutal theocracy you would like.
 
Last edited:
Just heard on Eyewitness News (Highveld) that the ad's been pulled... whilst sipping a Red Bull. Guess their stunt worked; I haven't had one in years. :whistle:

Another win for Team Middle Ages!
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X