LazyLion
King of de Jungle
The reasons in the article alone are more than enough to see why you shouldn't use police for guarding duties. What reasons do you have for using trained, comparatively highly paid police officers to guard buildings when they are so desperately needed for police work?
Actually, if the police had been doing their jobs all along over the last 16 years (with the full backing and support of the government), private security firms would not be needed (and would not be the massive industry that they are today). I agree that police should not have to be security guards standing guard over buildings... but that is because I believe the police should be so effective that buildings and homes should not need to guarded from rampant criminals. The first duty of the state is to protect it's citizens, but the ANC government says "bugger that, we'll just shave some of the public funds off for our own personal uses - no questions asked, wink, wink, nudge, nudge, and let the stupid public hire their own security guards at their own expense!"
Guarding buildings.... ESPECIALLY POLICE BUILDINGS, should not be a necessity in a properly functioning state. IT IS a necessity in South Africa because crime is out of control and the police are ineffective at controlling it.