Article: Woolworths boycott backed by shareholders

Nerfherder said:
Perhaps... Even so, a boycott will destroy a lot of local jobs
Click to expand...

Huh?

3% of the population worse case scenario?

So they will sell 3% less tomatoes. They will just make that up somewhere else. be it the farmer, the worker the retailer. It's so easy to stomp out a 3% decline it doesn't even take extra work.
 
Pitbull said:
No, this happens if something doesn't sell. If it sells, and good at that, no way they will pull it. EVER.
Click to expand...

Not at all. Companies often do things that are not good for profits, but morally good
 
JStrike said:
Not at all. Companies often do things that are not good for profits, but morally good
Click to expand...

as part of a process of recognizing that the long term value of the shares are best served by sustainable business practice or to satisfy regulatory requirements

Neither reason gives explanation towards succumbing to an irrational, hysterical and hypocritical agenda that has thrust itself onto your business
 
Paul Hjul said:
as part of a process of recognizing that the long term value of the shares are best served by sustainable business practice or to satisfy regulatory requirements

Neither reason gives explanation towards succumbing to an irrational, hysterical and hypocritical agenda that has thrust itself onto your business
Click to expand...

Sure. But what one person may consider "irrational, hysterical and hypocritical" may not be the same for another. Ditto for groups of people. Many societal factors influence that
 
^ some nutters here at MyBB would have you believe that's a Mossad hit squad :D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X