South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Everyone saying should of been Iniesta or Xavi, now the question is why ? Just because they won the World Cup with Spain. The award goes to player of the year and not who won what. Sneidjer was good, but Messi deserves it and the way he is playing. Don't be suprised if 3 in a row
Xavi is not any better than his Barca\Spanish team mates. They are all good at passing the ball. Messi on the other hand gives u a lot more than pass the ball
I think you greatly underestimate the impact Xavi has on both the Spanish national team and Barcelona.
Fact is Xavi is not World player of the year and will be forgotten as soon as he retires, Messi is and will continue to be for a long time to come. At the end of his career he might even be the greatest of them all, surpassing Pele and Maradona
I think because Xavi is almost never on the score sheet, people tend to not see him. All they see is Messi, Villa, Pedro or Bojan scoring. Take Xavi out of the team and see if Barcelona tick on like they currently do. That midfield basically comes to a halt without Xavi.
I tend to disagree - I think Xavi will be remembered for years to come by true soccer lovers, along with Iniesta as well. There are not many with the talents these 2 have.
The Maradona's and Pele's - it seems you tend to favour strikers and remember strikers quicker than midfielders. Ever heard of Xabi Alonso? lol
Point I'm trying to make - doesn't mean that a player that do not score many goals in his career will not get remembered as one of football's greats after his career has ended or is not influential in the team's success.