I’ve met one or two (in my 25 or so year career), but wow, the odds are against that happening.It's called hyperbole. I'm yet to meet any dev that has taugh themselves advanced calculus, geometry or similar skills.
Last edited:
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
I’ve met one or two (in my 25 or so year career), but wow, the odds are against that happening.It's called hyperbole. I'm yet to meet any dev that has taugh themselves advanced calculus, geometry or similar skills.
In my experience, you don’t get to the tech tests without a great CV.I find rather the opposite. if you fail the tech test you don't get an offer, no matter who good your CV is. However if you ace the tech test employers overlook it if you don't have a great CV.
They’re part of it, sure, but this is very sector specific. I have zero of the above.Then not to mention portfolios, contributing to opensource and github projects employers also look at.
Also, very sector specific. Raw time doesn’t matter as such, but if you’re hiring someone into a DE role, it’s unlikely they’re going to have less than 15 years of experience.Years experience I find in IT does not play as big a part in hiring as in other industries.
People have very different experiences. The questions one has to ask, are where has that experience taken them, and is their advice detrimental to those who could go further than them.This is my subjective view based on my experience. I understand if you might disagree.
I'm not sure most companies have the luxury of operating this way. I just started an incredible remote job for a US company, and they didn't even ask for my CV until after they'd firmly indicated the job was mine. The initial interview and the subsequent take-home assignment for the technical round thinned the herd from hundreds of applicants to almost nothing (there were times I got the impression I was the only person left standing - the assignment was really tricky).I find rather the opposite. if you fail the tech test you don't get an offer, no matter who good your CV is. However if you ace the tech test employers overlook it if you don't have a great CV.
Then not to mention portfolios, contributing to opensource and github projects employers also look at.
Years experience I find in IT does not play as big a part in hiring as in other industries.
This is my subjective view based on my experience. I understand if you might disagree.
So...what did you lie about on your C.V. or during YOUR interview?Do you honestly think an executive at a company who changes there 1 year duration old job they worked for 1 yea ago from developer to development management and is caught out would get fired? Or someone who says they have 1 year experience in x tech when they only have 6 months should suffer the same consequence?
That is what interviews are for. To test your technical ability. Same with certs really.
Only if they're real though...................................GCSE is Cambridge so that's easy to get, Zimsec certificates also not that difficult to get hold of.
Those are not white lies. White lies are if the HR person asks if those jeans make their bum look big and you say no to spare their feelings.What about people who lie about their job titles or experience? Are white lies acceptable or can people who tell white lies also not be trusted?
I don’t quite follow what you are saying. Do you not have a LinkedIn? Are you saying they interviewed you without knowing anything about you, then offered you a job and asked for your CV after?I'm not sure most companies have the luxury of operating this way. I just started an incredible remote job for a US company, and they didn't even ask for my CV until after they'd firmly indicated the job was mine. The initial interview and the subsequent take-home assignment for the technical round thinned the herd from hundreds of applicants to almost nothing (there were times I got the impression I was the only person left standing - the assignment was really tricky).
And when my CV was touched on when I was presented to the entire team by my boss, he highlighted how every aspect of the CV was personalised to their company and the job listing they put out. So that may assist more than a generic thing you send to everyone.
It would stress me out so much if my CV contained fabrications. I don't know how anyone can live like that. If you have skills, use them to get a job or start a business. If you don't have skills, develop skills.
This actually reminds me there was a big SA recruiter who posted on LinkedIn about a senior dev who was threatening suicide as he lost his job due to the pandemic. She said he was being sent to interviews but because he was stressed about his situation was doing badly and was not getting offers. She was inviting anyone to help him directly and she wouldn't charge commission. The post got so many likes and went viral and made the recruiter really look good for caring . I wanted to help and got the guys details. He had very little industry experience but wanted to earn much more per month that I earn. I also didn't want to ruin my reputation if I passed his details on so I verified his previous experience and the employer on his resume confirmed he never worked there, his contract he used as proof as salary he never started, nor did the company close down due to the pandemic as the recruiter claimed. I then relayed this info back to the recruiter privately in case they made a mistake by mixing something up in their linkedin post or the information they sent me. The recruiter went into damage control and very quickly forgot about a guy that was apparently suicidal. Found this rather ironic. Was bit pissed off with the recruiter for a bit for making me waste my time but left it there.
Yeah, they knew as near as nothing about me going into the first round. I was running my own B2B agency and not very bothered with LinkedIn (although I had a page). The way I responded to the job listing was why I was given an interview.I don’t quite follow what you are saying? Do you not have a LinkedIn? Are you saying they interviewed you without knowing anything about you, then offered you a job and asked for your CV after?
Yes and no. I can talk a bit from both sides of the coin, I've never used any advance calculus in my career but I'm also well aware that certain job functions require to program models etc. Probably most of the tertiary mathematics I've used is statistics and even that not much beyond the basic initial.It's called hyperbole. I'm yet to meet any dev that has taugh themselves advanced calculus, geometry or similar skills.
I don't. I undersell myself. Hence why I take notice of these things and post about it. as I am curious about others expereiencesSo...what did you lie about on your C.V. or during YOUR interview?
"The lady doth protest too much, methinks"...........
I just go look at LinkedIn profiles of people I have work with in the past and notice how they describe their job duties and job titles which I know its not true.Those are not white lies. White lies are if the HR person asks if those jeans make their bum look big and you say no to spare their feelings.
Maybe you can find an actual example of white lie that might be found on a CV?
Issue is he used her as a recruiter and convinces her with fraudulent information. Is the job of a recruiter not to do basic verification or must you trust blindly? He also has a B.Sc degree in Computer Science and Informatics which AFAIK is not possible. You have it in one or the other so I suspect it might be fake.She got fooled by a scammer, happens, they always have sob stories.
The principles and fundamentals are huge though. Apart from these, even in terms of technology, it's not like the changes haven't been somewhat incremental - ~25-30 years ago: networking (IP4, internet, signal processing, etc.), OpenGL, C++, SQL/ODBC, OS internals, assembler, CPU architecture, LISP, compilers, parsers, Python, Matlab, distributed computing, multi-threading, locking, etc. (somewhat of an overlap between technology and principles in the list, but mainly where the used archetypes are close to what we have today, albeit more primitive).My point though is that I attended tertiary over two decades ago. While the fundamentals hold, technology has changed so much since then that it is purely principals and fundamentals that are relevant.
Agreed, although the probability of these being topics of a more advanced nature is greatly reduced without the above mentioned principles and fundamentals. Not to say, it won't typically go "beyond matric" - it does for a bit, but then tends to grow more in breadth than depth.Everything else, is learnt from that time with additional study whether it be courses , self taught or online.
This is actually a case in point. There are a lot of self-taught or bootcamp taught data scientists / ML practitioners out there, but they barely touch on the fundamentals or the math (interestingly enough, most think they do, because they don't have a reference point). The reality is that for the most part (I say most, because there are certainly people who do it properly, but they are a very small minority), there is a world of difference between people working in this area with no degree level qualification, those with one, and even more so, those with post-graduate STEM qualifications.As to advanced mathematics, many folks drifted that way to teaching themselves more advanced structures, especially with the rise of data science and AI.
This is true - 2nd year maths used to be a requirement, but no longer is. It is still a large advantage, to have those pure CS principles, but it's a huge advantage to have some of maths/app.maths./stats to 2nd or 3rd year level and beyond, especially if one wants to advance to the point where one reads, implements, or even writes academic papers with some level of frequency.Also if I recall, most comsci degrees are relatively light on mathematics these days ( did engineering back then and I recall a very clear separation from the two around mathematics levels )
Either that or morbidly obese.Just don't lie, if a senior dev is good, they are fat beyond what they are taught at uni or would have been.