Rare indeed.
Out of interest, how popular is the account they're using?
Soon to be very popular (we hope)...
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Rare indeed.
Out of interest, how popular is the account they're using?
It must be schoolboys downloading the Internet.
No adult with a job plus family will ever be able to watch everything that they download. If they do, it means they won't have the latter for much longer.
Also, the world has moved to on-demand streaming, why download at all?
Because some people download for their friends and family.
Soon to be very popular (we hope)...![]()
In less than a month, I became a heavy user to Openweb with my 2Mbps uncapped service at R139. Why? Because apparently I use too much data. You judge.
17 GB(yes! 17GB)! for September(well part of the month since I connected maybe one week within the month.
4.5GB for the 1st 4 days of October.
They decided (on Saturday night afetr 7pm) that I should not be able to stream youtube or any other video site after using such a "terribly" high volume as this.
I cant figure this attitude out. First time ever have I received such a GRAND welcome.
whatwhat is a Crystal Web customer, and I can confirm that your assumptions are incorrect. whatwhat is one of a rare breed of customer who values quality and is prepared to pay for said quality rather than opting for the cheapest with the most gigs. It's an educated decision and one borne from a deep understanding of the market, and that's valued from an ISP's perspective tremendously. People are often too quick to jump down each others' throats on these topics. It's best to hear each other out and find common ground, or at least try to understand from someone else's perspective...
I see nothing wrong with ISPs defining what they consider hoggish behaviour
And if you take all 20 lobsters from the buffet and I get don't get get a morsel... why shouldn't I say something?
Unrealistic and idealistic.
Even if you have an unshaped account the ISP
- has limited IPC capacity
- limited internet capacity
The usage is not constant. It is particularly heavy near the end of the month and during certain tome slots.
So for there to be no throttling or shaping they would need a lot, lot more IPC and internet capacity
Thats costs money... which means the prices go up ... a lot.
If I paid for it, I have the right to take as many lobsters as I please, same applies to bandwith.
Not enough ipc capacity=poor network in my book....
Also capped consumer have already paid for their bandwith but still get shaped. Try to justify that from a consumers perspective...
I wouldn't mind if most ISP's implemented throttling to prevent data hogs like these, but then the thresholds should be reasonable. For example, 10Mbps should have a threshold no less than 600GB. That would nail all the crazy data hogs like in this article, but leave regular customers alone. My household uses 350-550GB a month with P2P downloading comprising a very small portion of that usage. It's a pain in the ass when I'm enquiring about uncapped accounts and discover that they introduce harsh shaping or throttling within that usage level.
I wouldn't mind if most ISP's implemented throttling to prevent data hogs like these, but then the thresholds should be reasonable. For example, 10Mbps should have a threshold no less than 600GB. That would nail all the crazy data hogs like in this article, but leave regular customers alone. My household uses 350-550GB a month with P2P downloading comprising a very small portion of that usage. It's a pain in the ass when I'm enquiring about uncapped accounts and discover that they introduce harsh shaping or throttling within that usage level.
Also, the world has moved to on-demand streaming, why download at all?