It's useless. flawed. biased.
keyword being BIASED.
google's search results are spot-on, and links you to the pages most relevant to what you are trying to find.....this bing thing, however, does not.
I did a quick test and when searching for "t!ts", on the first page (Which is most Important IMO) I could only see links to:
Page 1
uncyclopedia.wikia.com
.urbandictionary.com
amazon.com
amazon.com again
whois.domaintools.com
dictionary.reference.com
metacafe.com
page2:
photobucket.com
acronyms.thefreedictionary.com
encyclopediadramatica.com
blinkx.com
etc..
etc..
Ok, for those of you loling at my test, fine, laugh it up. but I have to say that a Biased Search Engine is not a search engine. not a true search engine anyway.
It might be a censor, so I could be wrong, but hey.... just stating my findings.
How much other stuff does it bias towards?
Google tends to try and NOT be biased in any way, and does a good job of it too.
I don't trust this Search Engine.
it seems fast though but if you test it, it's not really faster than google - try it for yourself.
EDIT: w1z4rd states my point too, and this is exactly what i'm talking about.
And a Search engine that can't find no pr0n easily, is useless anyway.