sensus communis
Expert Member
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2016
- Messages
- 2,903
- Reaction score
- 4,035
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Here are more lies from chatgpt for you to not believe
Here’s the key difference when you stack Blue Origin’s New Shepard against SpaceX’s Crew Dragon:
1. Re‑entry speed
New Shepard (sub‑orbital): Peaks at about 2,500 mph (roughly Mach 3) on its way back down — too slow to ionize the air or generate much frictional heating .
Crew Dragon (orbital): Comes in at roughly 17,500 mph (up near Mach 25), producing superheated plasma and skin‐temperatures above 3,000 °F .
2. Heating scales with velocity
Aerodynamic heating roughly follows the third to eighth power of velocity. Cut your speed by ∼8× (Mach 25 → Mach 3) and you slash heating by thousands of times — eliminating any chance of scorching .
3. Thermal‑protection materials
New Shepard uses durable, reusable coatings and insulation that see only mild heating — no ablation, no charring.
Crew Dragon relies on a PICA‑X ablative heat shield that sacrifices material to absorb heat, leaving the underside visibly “toasted” (and requiring shield refurbishment or replacement) .
4. Descent profile
After re‑entry, both capsules deploy parachutes, but New Shepard’s much gentler speed under canopy (just a few dozen mph) means virtually zero additional heating before touchdown. Crew Dragon still slows under chutes, but it’s coming off a far hotter entry.
---
Bottom line: SpaceX’s Dragon looks scorched because it’s built to survive orbital‑speed re‑entry with an ablative shield that chars away. Blue Origin’s New Shepard never reaches those blistering speeds, so it simply doesn’t get hot enough to leave scorch marks.
While the space flight was meant to celebrate women, the crew has faced some criticism. The backlash ranged from the environmental impact of the flight to looming cuts for actual Nasa employees.
Other celebrities also offered their two cents.
"I think it's a bit gluttonous," actress Olivia Munn said in an appearance on TODAY. "Space exploration was to further our knowledge and to help mankind. What are they going to do up there that is going to help us down here?"
Model and activist Emily Ratajkowski said on TikTok that the flight was "beyond parody".
"Look at the state of the world and think about how many resources went into putting these women into space," she said. "For what?"
So they went to space?
Celebnauts, that's the appropriate name or space tourist.
The celebknotsMore like celebnots
spaceflight participant is more appropriate,Celebnauts, that's the appropriate name or space tourist.
I would have loved an opportunity like this, for free. I won't lie, it will be interesting.spaceflight participant is more appropriate,
as a sack of potatoes going to orbit is more interesting.
as would I, but it does in a way exist for regular mortals,I would have loved an opportunity like this, for free. I won't lie, it will be interesting.
Perhaps just an astronaut.Saw a comment somewhere:
4 minutes in space makes you a qualified astronaut.
Last night I became a qualified gynecologist.