d0b33
Honorary Master
That's what is great about linux, choose which distro works for you.
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
It's not just WINE. Apart from the vast amount of application that can't load from the repos (I've tried the local one, the main one, even some European ones), the system also can't update.
I just haven't been enjoying much luck with Ubuntu at all!
OpenSUSE works like a charm right out of the box, though. Not a single application install has failed yet and I'm just enjoying a much better overall experience with it. Your mileage on Ubuntu may vary, but my mind has been made up.![]()
No, on the serious side, Ubuntu packages are the most widely supported. Especially when it comes to local. It also is a more than just decent repository.
I'm not sure I understand you here. What do you mean when you say most widely supported?
Nope, I meant *good* repositories![]()
The problem for me comes when you want to install something NOT in the repositories, how easy is it then to configure and install said package?
That is why I will never in all my live touch another RPM based distro (RPM hell - last time I touched anything RPM based was back in 2003) and the reason I'll stick with Gentoo tank you very much (source based)!
Fedora (rpm based) does the exact same thing. All you have to do is yum localinstall <path to rpm>. Any needed dependencies will be pulled off the repos as well.
tbf MyWorld's statement is similar to someone saying they will never touch linux again because they had a bad experience in 2003. I was merely pointing out that there is a RPM based distro which treats installing standalone RPMs in a similar way that deb packages are handled.
As I use both a deb and a RPM based distro quite often, I felt it necessary to highlight the fact.