C#/C Developer

[Empty Chair]

C#/C developer responsible for building C#/C applications, including anything from back-end services and web development to their client-end counterparts. Your primary responsibilities will be to design and develop these applications, and to coordinate with the rest of the team working on different layers of the infrastructure. Therefore, a commitment to collaborative problem solving, sophisticated design, and quality product is essential. Candidates should be 35 years or over.
Proficient in C#/C, with a good knowledge of its ecosystems
Familiarity with the .NET framework
Familiarity with the Mono framework would be an advantage
Strong understanding of object-oriented programming
Skill for writing reusable C# libraries
Familiar with various design and architectural patterns
Knowledge of concurrency patterns in C#/C
Familiarity with Microsoft SQL Server and postgreSQL
Experience with popular web application frameworks, such as MVC and HTML5
Knack for writing clean, readable C#/C code
Understanding fundamental design principles behind a scalable application
Creating database schemas that represent and support business processes
Basic understanding of Common Language Runtime (CLR), its limitations, weaknesses, and workarounds
Implementing automated testing platforms and unit tests
Proficient understanding of code versioning tools such as SVN and Git
Familiarity with continuous integration and the tools used ant/nant or Maven
University level qualification preferably in Engineering, Mathematics or Computer Science.

 

[Necropolis]

C# and C are completely different languages...

So I'm not sure what you mean when you say C#/C...?

 

[Hamster]

Candidates should be 35 years or over.

Well that's a first :wtf:

 

[CamiKaze]

So basically a C# and C Dev that can code everything from backend, middleware, frontend and various web related technologies.
Good luck.

I happen to have experience in C and C# though.

 

[ph4t3]

Same here. Nowhere near over 35 though.

 

[HibiscusTunes]

This must be a troll

 

[mister]

Same here. Nowhere near over 35 though.

I wouldn't worry. It's another work-from-home pro-bono position.

 

[skimread]

No way to apply. Seems to be fake

 

[NeonNinja]

Well that's a first :wtf:

Only mature folks...

 

[freddster]

Jack of all trades master of none position

 

[cguy]

C#/C = #

 

[etienne_marais]

C#/C = #

,but is the # OO ?

 

[Shi]

No location or salary, try again sonny

 

[cguy]

,but is the # OO ?

I think the # is what the OP's been smoking.

 

[Biscuit1018]

No location or salary, try again sonny

Obviously location is vital. Experience needed is also important.


I do have a question because I recruit people (but don't advertise on MyBB)

People do seem to expect accurate salary ranges.
For large companies this is easy to do because they have fixed ranges.

Smaller companies often dont have ranges.
Dev skills are in short supply so they have no idea how senior they will hire when the advertise.
So if they published a range the range would be huge and meaningless.

So how important is publishing salary ranges? Would you ignore a good advert if there was no indication of salary?

 

[NeonNinja]

According to your experience do you receive more applications for salary stated or non salary stated?

 

[FarligOpptreden]

I find it frustrating that good developers are expected to be fluent in front-end technologies as well, never mind be able to actually piece together a good user experience design. I rate myself as fairly strong in the UI / UX department, I'm more than proficient in back-end tech (C#, Java and Node.js) and I can write SQL queries that will make your brain hurt.

I know what resources like this cost (I have to employ them for my own business), so the middling salaries they often offer for these positions is an insult to the developers. Either that, or the hiring company is content with sub-standard work being delivered (which I detest).

 

[Genisys]

Obviously location is vital. Experience needed is also important.


I do have a question because I recruit people (but don't advertise on MyBB)

People do seem to expect accurate salary ranges.
For large companies this is easy to do because they have fixed ranges.

Smaller companies often dont have ranges.
Dev skills are in short supply so they have no idea how senior they will hire when the advertise.
So if they published a range the range would be huge and meaningless.

So how important is publishing salary ranges? Would you ignore a good advert if there was no indication of salary?

I'd ignore any adverts with no mention of salary ranges. Most of the time, it is just not worth the hassle to go for all of the interviews and just to find out that the salary isn't in line with your expectations. What I've seen a lot is people advertising a position with a salary, and mentioning that the salary is dependant on experience.

 

[Hamster]

So how important is publishing salary ranges? Would you ignore a good advert if there was no indication of salary?

The rules are simple:
* if you are advertising a job then you post the expected salary range. My current salary/package is none of your business.
* if I approach you looking for a job you can do whatever you want with the salary.

And yes, I skip over job ads with no salary indication unless something in the title or first two lines draws me.

Done the whole time wasting thing, never again. I don't see the point in having another two or three meetings only to get to the salary part at the end and realise they want cheap labour.

This is 80% money, 20% love baby.

EDIT: oh, and if you really want me to ignore a post mention the phrase "market related". Market related means nothing unless you are saying I'm "market average".

 

[Biscuit1018]

I'd ignore any adverts with no mention of salary ranges. Most of the time, it is just not worth the hassle to go for all of the interviews and just to find out that the salary isn't in line with your expectations. What I've seen a lot is people advertising a position with a salary, and mentioning that the salary is dependant on experience.

Thanks for the feedback.

The push back from companies publishing salary ranges is multi-fold

a) The ranges are big. Sometimes as much as R40k per month from top to bottom (of course different seniorities)
b) The upper end of the range bites them with existing staff who want a salary review because they ar below the top end.
c) Applicants believe they are in the upper end of the range almost regardless.

Having said that I would agree that companies could publish more salary detail.

My pet hate is Job Specs with a long list of skills.
In reality there are always only a few killer criteria and the rest are negotiable.
The negotiable skills are usually not separated from the killer criteria which either
- over-filters people or
- encourages the hiring of a jack-of-all and master-of-none