[email protected]
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2005
- Messages
- 125
- Reaction score
- 0
pupa said:Point here the argument and "constraints" you refer to is not logical. Correct me if I am wrong, May take on this is:
Nobody can do anything about the international oil price. In analogy Telkom can do something about the Broadband issues.
If the car runs out of feul it stops. Broadband do not need to stop.
Feul prices are determined by market economy. Broadband South Africa pricing is determined by TELKOM greed.
Telkom charge international rates for local bandwidth that should be free. More theft. Therefore IS is doing it differently with retaining the local 30Gig bandwidth. The reason Telkom have problems is that even if I surf locally, it could be routed via international routes. Now that Telkom vs IS have the issues re the peering I think Telkom have no choice to do so as they shot themselves also in the foot. So all they do as usual is transfer the problem and expense over to the consumer.
Again correct me if I am wrong, I also want to learn
Sure, what you say is true, and cannot be disputed. My point is that within the confines of the hard cap and the high price, users know what they can get out of their broadband account, and should be knowledgeable enough to know that they will reach their cap, and to make the necessary provision to keep an active account going.
I'm not discussing the pricing or capping, which is a disgrace, but rather the way some users are dealing with the situation.