South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Whoah Kilo!kilo39 said:So now using the word "rascist" is a personal attack?! How else would you like me to put it?
Your rascist agenda? A personal attack? Well, fine.
Hello Kilo,kilo39 said:Thanks BTTB![]()
Idiot? Call it what it is - I certainly have been called the same thing on occasion - it provides impetus to the learning curve!
Zille said last week that the City refused to pick up the tab of more than R200-million for overrun costs and claims by contractors against the City for payment delays.
It is still unclear how the first 705 completed units will be allocated. Building costs of the units have increased significantly since the project started, resulting in a R35-million budget overrun for the first phase.
-
Zille has welcomed this, saying: "The auditor general's involvement is a welcome development. We are also committed to continuing our forensic audit into the matter."
-
Zille said she "welcomed the admission" by Sisulu that province and national government should "share in covering the outstanding costs of this project". The City is still responsible for the funding and provision of bulk infrastructure for the development.
Local Government and Housing MEC Richard Dyantyi could not be reached for comment late on Monday night. Neither could Sisulu's spokesperson, who did not return several messages.
They probably sleep well?kilo39 said:35 million rand overrun = 705 completed units
Bwaahahaha - a model of efficiency and competency - and now it's back where it started - on the road to none.
/edit/ how do these people sleep at night?
"these people" = guilty of non-delivery, massive overspending - and could I say corruption?
kilo39 said:35 million rand overrun = 705 completed units
Bwaahahaha - a model of efficiency and competency - and now it's back where it started - on the road to none.
/edit/ how do these people sleep at night?
"these people" = guilty of non-delivery, massive overspending - and could I say corruption?
The African Rebirth.kilo39 said:Sad days for SA - yet more of the same. What happened to the Renaissance?
Never mind that BEE is itself, by definition, racist - since it seeks favourable treatment of one group over another solely on the basis of skin colour.Angelo said:Without even reading the article I agree she's not a mayor of the people, she has scrapped a BEE compliance requirement for tenders which is sad given the economic disparities that still exist in that city. No wonder the ANC is wrestling to get control of the city back because with Zille in charge it will never shed its "racist city" tag seemingly.
ignacio said:Never mind that BEE is itself, by definition, racist - since it seeks favourable treatment of one group over another solely on the basis of skin colour.
BEE should be scrapped - Zille acted correctly... inefficient, corrupt, or incompetent contractors ONLY exacerbate the "economic disparities" - simply put, would you not want houses built on time and on cost by competent contractors or enrich a few BEE ones who can't even get the job done? BEE is a disaster so far... I am quite sick of it: in the case of the dept. of home affairs, from my experience, they have a terrible lack of competence, no doubt due to BEE policies... so how does that work? You "empower" one individual by giving them a job they are incapable of doing or not trained to do and you get maybe some economic spillover to that person's immediate social circle (family etc)... but that one person, because of their limitations, keeps people from getting ID cards on time or delays visas for foreign nationals... so imagine the net economic empowerment loss to society because of this one empowerment? Imagine the net economic loss when that one empowered person is a minister! (Ivy??) Putting inefficient, incompetent or corrupt people into public office does not aid economic empowerment at all.
My suggestion is do away with BEE (since it - again - is racist) and black consumers should just encourage change through consumer action: they have the vast majority in numbers, so why don't they support only black empowered companies? This takes black empowerment away from the government (where it shouldn't be) and back to the people (e.g. do they want to shop at certain places, or do shop owners mind losing all black shoppers?) Back that up with strong small business support and you have a recipe for blacks to empower themselves instead of getting favourable goverment treatment that hurts us all.
Hell man Africans dont understood by AfricansBTTB said:Zille, who was kicked out of the project after she halted all payments for the project, says contracts were not signed, budgets were overshot by millions of rands, and it there seems to have been some corruption in the process. This is the reason why they are doing a forensic audit, she says.
Cape housing beneficiaries have longer wait
The African Rebirth.
As in post "dark ages".
But this applies to the rest of Africa. Not us.
Here we can live in corruption while the other parts of Africa play catch up.
In the case of Zimbabwe it seems they missed the boat and are marching back into the "dark ages".
South Africa is sort of hanging in the balance, not going in any particular direction.
But IMO The Renaissance should have been confined to post 1500 European History. Did Africa have a "dark ages" like Europe? One will never really know, but I think the people in Africa were just idling along, minding their own business.
This terminology is not understood by Africans?![]()
Where does Muslims, Indians, Zimbabweans, Nigerians fit in the numbers here?BTTB said:I read some statistics of the make up of the people living in Cape Town.
Whether it is a true reflection of the current status quo, is not known to me.
White - 600 000
Black - 800 000
Coloured - 1 200 000
Total - 2 600 000
lilDeath said:Where does Muslims, Indians, Zimbabweans, Nigerians fit in the numbers here?