CapeXit 2

Poll is for all in South Africa -

  • Do you believe W/Cape secession from the Republic is feasible ?

    Votes: 28 34.1%

  • Would you support a bid for W/Cape to secede from the Republic ?

    Votes: 33 40.2%

  • In the event of secession being successful, would you consider migrating to W/Cape ?

    Votes: 23 28.0%

  • In the event of secession being successful, would you consider migrating out of W/Cape ?

    Votes: 3 3.7%

  • Would you support other provinces bids for secession ?

    Votes: 20 24.4%

  • I disagree to all questions

    Votes: 35 42.7%

  • Would you support a "Swiss Canton" style of governance for the Republic ?

    Votes: 24 29.3%
  • Total voters
    82
Status
Not open for further replies.
lexity said:
Ok, let's see if there are any pinkos(even non-pinkos are welcome) who are ready to participate in this thought experiment...

Question:
Click to expand...

Before we partake in this thought experiment, please expand on the outcomes and intent for the question.
 
So, ok, let's go a step further and admit that we would prefer not to merely abide by all these entry contracts society thrusts in our face as we merely attempt to be part of the crowd.

It does however bring us back to my earlier point - people (sometimes in low-development stages, but not always even that) will take advantage of circumstances and mould their advantages to some generally-considered-unfair degree.
 
lexity said:
[Please help me fire-proof my hok, in case of uncontrollable setting of my hen-pecking feathers alight]

:ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL:
Click to expand...

So you refuse to answer anyone elses questions and instead post your own and when questioned on the intent you get all uppity about it?
 
vigras rojara said:
You have got to be joking. Legal arguments are generally structured along the following lines:

Facts
Issues
Reasoning
Argument
Conclusion

Walls of waffle are the exact opposite of this.
Click to expand...

Nope. Advocates waffle endlessly in the courts ;)
 
vigras rojara said:
You have got to be joking. Legal arguments are generally structured along the following lines:

Facts
Issues
Reasoning
Argument
Conclusion

Walls of waffle are the exact opposite of this.
Click to expand...
When simple thought experiment is too much... just say the word 'waffle', and you're good to go.

Checks watch... hmmm, nearly libertarian-joke o'clock.... ho-hum.
 
lexity said:
When simple thought experiment is too much... just say the word 'waffle', and you're good to go.

Checks watch... hmmm, nearly libertarian-joke o'clock.... ho-hum.
Click to expand...

You are free to spread your "thoughts" around the place. That's fine.

You would, however, make an incredibly poor attorney.
 
vigras rojara said:
Not really.
Click to expand...

I was once cross examined for half an hour re my witnessing a traffic accident, the issue being if I "meant" to say 15 or 50 metres. I pled with the judge to make the character move on, the judge ignored me.
 
Brian_G said:
I was once cross examined for half an hour re my witnessing a traffic accident, the issue being if I "meant" to say 15 or 50 metres. I pled with the judge to make the character move on, the judge ignored me.
Click to expand...

The question is vitally important from a legal standpoint as a witness though, its not waffling. And if it took half an hour, then why didn't you play ball with the lawyer? Why were you so evasive in a simple question?
 
lexity said:
:ROFL:

I'm not asking you for special treatment, under the law.

You are.

So again, for the 3rd time this morning, the burden is on YOU to justify special privilege before the law.
Click to expand...
Nope, I am not asking for anything to change, I think our current economy is fine and that certain regulations regarding health and safety, environmental protections and fire are needed additions to our economy.

You are the one saying that it all needs to change yet you cannot provide any actual real life examples of your economy in real life and you refuse to explain how it works theoretically. If I abondon this conversating, the economic status quo that exists in most western economies and that I support will carry on as normal. Your desired state will be no closer to reality. I don't need to defend what is currently in place because you cannot give me any good reason as to why certain business regulations are a bad idea and you refuse to show me a practical example of a free market economy that works better.

lexity said:
Is it because you are at a permanent disadvantage i.e. 'learning-challenged'?
Click to expand...
Can't resist resorting to insults can you Lexity.
 
ToxicBunny's contractual offer:

I agree to participate in the above thought experiment under the following conditions....

1) I reserve the right, under this here contract, to defer to authority when it looks like my argument is about to be exposed as the most slender of fig-leaves it will most probably turn out to be.

2) No other conditions shall form any weight in contradicting 1, above.

Signed______________
Dated_______________
Click to expand...

:ROFL:
 
Vorastra said:
Second thread for a thing that's not gonna happen. Bruh...I swear.
Click to expand...
Only threads will be about exit but the Western Cape will remain under South Africa and i know why Cape exit won't happen... It will only be discussed here but actually it won't happen or else war on the line.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X