porchrat
Honorary Master
I read it just fine. You showed me a list of Acts. That's all.Do re-read my previous posts would you...
You are aware that Affirmative Action, Property Clause, Socio-economic rights and right to life are all part of the Constitution.
There's a property clause in the Constitution thanks to the new amendment. The ACTS you've mentioned are Acts though, created under the framework of the Constitution. They're NOT part of the Constitution and never will be.
Yet despite firearms and our rights to own them not being clarified specifically in the Constitution you've got Acts regarding firearms... weird right?I'm aware of the most recent Judgement regarding, firearm ownership is not a fundamental constitutional right in South Africa and furthermore ruled that the right to life does not create a constitutional right to own a firearm.
It's a shame that they're wrong about it, because of course protecting, defending / self-defence yourself, family, community etc... with a firearm is exactly THE RIGHT TO LIFE![]()
It's almost as though Acts are created within a framework defined by the Constitution, and are not actually a part of that Constitution... and hence not subject to all the additional protections afforded to that Constitution... and that these concepts are not the same.
When someone makes the statement that there are 114 racist laws in the Constitution that person is wrong. This isn't debatable.
