Most cheap androids will give you two day battery life.
my note 10 pro can go for + 4 days sharp sharp , and it can charge to full in super quick time
Most cheap androids will give you two day battery life.
Lol and more than capable of a 2 day battery lifeXiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a 108 megapixel camera![]()
Lol and more than capable of a 2 day battery life
They won't, but there are a fair few that have very good battery life so it should be easy to avoid a lemon if you do some basic research before buying anything.Most cheap androids will give you two day battery life.
I have a sneaking suspicion that putting some sample pics side by side would show an alarming disparity. The Android devices with comparable photo quality cost as much as the iPhones (other than Pixel phones, which aren't sold here anyway).Very kind of you. My phone, which is actually worth the price, has a perfectly decent camera and battery life probably rivals your iPhone.
The thing that convinced me to buy into iPhone was when I was chewing the fat with a friendly client after a meeting and he took out his iPad to show me some pics of his recently born son. As the guy scrolled through his Photos library, pausing now and again for a few things that stood out, my eyes just about fell out of their sockets at the realisation of how badly I had f**ked up with my personal photos.This is why I place so much on the camera and what it can do
In 2019 I was lucky enough to go abroad and haven't been since - I'm happy I could capture everything and look back
Megapixels are not the primary metric you should ever concern yourself with.Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a 108 megapixel camera![]()
Not without abnormally light usage.my note 10 pro can go for + 4 days sharp sharp , and it can charge to full in super quick time
If you think MP count alone makes a camera good, well then you obviously got suckered by the marketing.
PS. this is 108MP (left) vs. a 'measly' 48MP (right), which one do you think shows more detail?
View attachment 1444201
Good lord. That's my opinion. Deal with it. I'm not asking anyone to share it.
For YOUR personal usage it's not justified. It's not true for everyone else.i know they is more to a camera then just the megapixels .... but for personal usage doesnt justify 37K vs 5K.If you use the camera for professional usage then thats a different story.
Suck it up buttercupAnyone who is not me or has my exact same values and circumstances is an idiot.
Personal usage almost always includes capturing valuable moments with friends, families and holidays. Having almost DSLR-like image quality and 'live photos' that show the seconds each pic was taken is so amazing I can't believe people would give that up to save a few grand. Or more realistically, save a few hundred each month on a cheaper contract.i know they is more to a camera then just the megapixels .... but for personal usage doesnt justify 37K vs 5K.If you use the camera for professional usage then thats a different story.
Agg shem. Doesnt care but takes the time to respond, which is it now?Oh nooos. Just don't let the internet randoms think I'm salty.
Do both not pixel bin to 12MP or something like that ?If you think MP count alone makes a camera good, well then you obviously got suckered by the marketing.
PS. this is 108MP (left) vs. a 'measly' 48MP (right), which one do you think shows more detail?
View attachment 1444201
And conversely, it kinda breaks my heart a bit when friends or acquaintances show me their family pics from their phone or via WhatsApp, and the first thing I think is "This trash-quality photo is all you're going to have decades from now of this amazing moment. How can you not spend a few bucks extra for a phone with an amazing camera..."