Christmas tech wishlist

Bryn

Doubleplusgood
Joined
Oct 29, 2010
Messages
16,894
Most cheap androids will give you two day battery life.
They won't, but there are a fair few that have very good battery life so it should be easy to avoid a lemon if you do some basic research before buying anything.

Battery life becomes a much hazier metric to objectively compare when you're actually using your device for watching media, recording vids and taking photos, and in general ramping up your screen-on time.

Other than some weird Asus gaming phones, the iPhone 13 Pro Max and 14 Pro Max are champs in this area. It's easy to say that battery life is a point in favour of iPhones.

Very kind of you. My phone, which is actually worth the price, has a perfectly decent camera and battery life probably rivals your iPhone.
I have a sneaking suspicion that putting some sample pics side by side would show an alarming disparity. The Android devices with comparable photo quality cost as much as the iPhones (other than Pixel phones, which aren't sold here anyway).

This is why I place so much on the camera and what it can do

In 2019 I was lucky enough to go abroad and haven't been since - I'm happy I could capture everything and look back
The thing that convinced me to buy into iPhone was when I was chewing the fat with a friendly client after a meeting and he took out his iPad to show me some pics of his recently born son. As the guy scrolled through his Photos library, pausing now and again for a few things that stood out, my eyes just about fell out of their sockets at the realisation of how badly I had f**ked up with my personal photos.

It wasn't just the outstanding quality of the pics, it was how they were all live photos with a second or two of video and sound. You could genuinely feel the moment when they were captured, in a way that is hard to describe. That guy has the most incredible, futuristic photo album imaginable and will be able to treasure and relive all the precious moments he has captured with his family. The world's best DSLR/mirrorless camera wouldn't come close.

It was immediately clear that I'd be a moron to not get that for myself. It's a slight tragedy to not have it already, but at least I quickly sorted it out going forward and before I started my own family. I take vastly more photos now than I did previously, precisely because it's so cool seeing people and places properly in the moment.

And conversely, it kinda breaks my heart a bit when friends or acquaintances show me their family pics from their phone or via WhatsApp, and the first thing I think is "This trash-quality photo is all you're going to have decades from now of this amazing moment. How can you not spend a few bucks extra for a phone with an amazing camera..."

Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a 108 megapixel camera;)
Megapixels are not the primary metric you should ever concern yourself with.

my note 10 pro can go for + 4 days sharp sharp , and it can charge to full in super quick time
Not without abnormally light usage.

Screenshot-2022-12-19-at-12-43-36.jpg


And it ranks below the iPhone 14 Pro Max anyway. Link.
Screenshot-2022-12-19-at-12-44-09.jpg
 

prod

Executive Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2009
Messages
6,132
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a 108 megapixel camera;)

If you think MP count alone makes a camera good, well then you obviously got suckered by the marketing.

PS. this is 108MP (left) vs. a 'measly' 48MP (right), which one do you think shows more detail?

1671447696932.png
 

ubercal

Expert Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2005
Messages
3,986
If you think MP count alone makes a camera good, well then you obviously got suckered by the marketing.

PS. this is 108MP (left) vs. a 'measly' 48MP (right), which one do you think shows more detail?

View attachment 1444201

i know they is more to a camera then just the megapixels .... but for personal usage doesnt justify 37K vs 5K.If you use the camera for professional usage then thats a different story.
 

Messugga

Honorary Master
Joined
Sep 4, 2007
Messages
12,746
i know they is more to a camera then just the megapixels .... but for personal usage doesnt justify 37K vs 5K.If you use the camera for professional usage then thats a different story.
For YOUR personal usage it's not justified. It's not true for everyone else.
 

Bryn

Doubleplusgood
Joined
Oct 29, 2010
Messages
16,894
i know they is more to a camera then just the megapixels .... but for personal usage doesnt justify 37K vs 5K.If you use the camera for professional usage then thats a different story.
Personal usage almost always includes capturing valuable moments with friends, families and holidays. Having almost DSLR-like image quality and 'live photos' that show the seconds each pic was taken is so amazing I can't believe people would give that up to save a few grand. Or more realistically, save a few hundred each month on a cheaper contract.
 

Dolby

Honorary Master
Joined
Jan 31, 2005
Messages
32,628
If you think MP count alone makes a camera good, well then you obviously got suckered by the marketing.

PS. this is 108MP (left) vs. a 'measly' 48MP (right), which one do you think shows more detail?

View attachment 1444201
Do both not pixel bin to 12MP or something like that ?
 

lunch

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2007
Messages
809
And conversely, it kinda breaks my heart a bit when friends or acquaintances show me their family pics from their phone or via WhatsApp, and the first thing I think is "This trash-quality photo is all you're going to have decades from now of this amazing moment. How can you not spend a few bucks extra for a phone with an amazing camera..."

Not everyone puts as much stock into photos as you do. I'd rather, you know, spend the time and make the memories than worry about whether or not there's a stray pixel on a photo because my phone has 1 megapixel fewer. They're having fun while you justify spending 40k to take selfies by yourself, don't worry though in 10 years time when the current tech is obsolete you can fawn over your relatively "trash-quality" selfie
 
Top