Eish.
This is gonna be a long one.
My Citroen Picasso's BSI burned out on the first of January.
I had all the wiring replaced, ordered the BSI from Citroen/Peugeot Woodmead on the 3rd of Feb.
After being shunted around for a bit I was told the part was unavailable.
I forwarded this to my insurance company and they started proceedings to write the car off.
This was about the 10th of march already. All insurance company needed was letter from the dealer that the part was unavailable. On the 18th of March I bought a second hand car for R38000, I had been without a car since the beginning of the year and I could not continue without one. After phoning the dealer over and over asking for the letter and not getting anything but promises, the insurance company where about to write the car off using the recorded confirmation over the phone that the part was unavailable when they where advised to phone PMSA to get the letter. This was on the 21st of April.
They phone PMSA, and get told not only that the part is available, but that it has NEVER BEEN OUT OF STOCK. I get a call from the insurance company telling me this. So I freak out a bit. Alot actually.
Enter the Dealer Principal. I phone the DP at Woodmead. He promises to begin an investigation and get back to me. I get a call shortly after from the parts department telling me that "Surprise! Your part will arrive tomorrow!"
I'm still freaking out. So I phone PMSA and speak to the supervisor. He tells me that the part (programed to my vehicle specifically) is not only available but was invoiced to the dealership on the 15th of March! :wtf:

At this point I'm going spare. Librarian poo.
The part was invoiced BEFORE I spent R38000 on another car.
In fact if they had just done their jobs I would have been DRIVING my car on the 18th instead of buying another one. I try and phone the DP again, he has gone home for the day.
The next day (22nd) I try and phone the DP again only to find that he has left and will only be back on the 28th. He's taken a long weekend you see. Nice being a DP, you get 5 day weekends apparently.
Wednesday I was hectic, so I only phone him again yesterday. He sounds surprised that I actually phoned him. He mails me the correspondence from his part manager that covers the basics, but doesn't address the 36 day gap in which the part arrived and when I notified them that it was available by phoning the DP. I say I am looking for some kind of compensation because I am hugely out of pocket due to their negligence.
He replies to me basically saying that my Citroen is now running and I should be happy and just go away. Ah Bugrit. Here are the mails:
DP:
I Reply:
His response:
So thats it? A polite fsk off. Imo he is hoping the the bureaucracy will protect the clear incompetence of his organisation.
So I say:
I must have pressed a button because he replied within 10 minuets with this:

Anyway, I don't actually care who screwed up. They are the people I was dealing with and for them to try and pass the buck on to PMSA is PISS POOR.
The DP should have contacted his counterpart at PMSA and said "Between us there was a screw up, how can we fix it". I am not expecting them to pay the R38000 rand for my car. I am expecting them to come to the party and offer some kind of compensation. Even if I'm not quite sure what that is.
What do you think is a fair compensation? R200 a day for the unnecessary delay?
Anyway, so the next step is PMSA customer care. Lets see where that takes us....
This is gonna be a long one.
My Citroen Picasso's BSI burned out on the first of January.
I had all the wiring replaced, ordered the BSI from Citroen/Peugeot Woodmead on the 3rd of Feb.
After being shunted around for a bit I was told the part was unavailable.
I forwarded this to my insurance company and they started proceedings to write the car off.
This was about the 10th of march already. All insurance company needed was letter from the dealer that the part was unavailable. On the 18th of March I bought a second hand car for R38000, I had been without a car since the beginning of the year and I could not continue without one. After phoning the dealer over and over asking for the letter and not getting anything but promises, the insurance company where about to write the car off using the recorded confirmation over the phone that the part was unavailable when they where advised to phone PMSA to get the letter. This was on the 21st of April.
They phone PMSA, and get told not only that the part is available, but that it has NEVER BEEN OUT OF STOCK. I get a call from the insurance company telling me this. So I freak out a bit. Alot actually.
Enter the Dealer Principal. I phone the DP at Woodmead. He promises to begin an investigation and get back to me. I get a call shortly after from the parts department telling me that "Surprise! Your part will arrive tomorrow!"
I'm still freaking out. So I phone PMSA and speak to the supervisor. He tells me that the part (programed to my vehicle specifically) is not only available but was invoiced to the dealership on the 15th of March! :wtf:
At this point I'm going spare. Librarian poo.
The part was invoiced BEFORE I spent R38000 on another car.
In fact if they had just done their jobs I would have been DRIVING my car on the 18th instead of buying another one. I try and phone the DP again, he has gone home for the day.
The next day (22nd) I try and phone the DP again only to find that he has left and will only be back on the 28th. He's taken a long weekend you see. Nice being a DP, you get 5 day weekends apparently.
Wednesday I was hectic, so I only phone him again yesterday. He sounds surprised that I actually phoned him. He mails me the correspondence from his part manager that covers the basics, but doesn't address the 36 day gap in which the part arrived and when I notified them that it was available by phoning the DP. I say I am looking for some kind of compensation because I am hugely out of pocket due to their negligence.
He replies to me basically saying that my Citroen is now running and I should be happy and just go away. Ah Bugrit. Here are the mails:
DP:
Herewith John’s response, we could carry on forever trading e-mails with who said what and when, but I do not believe this will sort anything out.
From our side and looking at all the correspondence I am certain that we followed all procedures and were not notified by the factory of the arrival of the part, you yourself mentioned that you were told by Tshepo from PMSA that this part was not available.
I believe there have been many communication errors here by all parties concerned. The fact that you went and purchased another vehicle prior to your insurance company making a decision to write off the vehicle cannot be blamed on ourselves under any circumstances.
I am not sure how I can be of any further assistance with this matter as we have fitted the part and your C3 Picasso is now mobile.
Regards
I Reply:
Hi Ian.
We do not need to dispute what was said. Here are the facts.
It took 36 days for your dealership to notify me that the part I needed for my vehicle run had arrived. During those 36 days both I and my insurance company where advised by a representative of your dealership that the part would be unavailable indefinitely. Both myself and the insurance company have these calls recorded and on record. The vehicle would have been written off had this statement been true.
Moreover, we have the admission that the procedure was not followed by John in the email below.
That’s all that matters. The rest is bunk. Unless we can come to an agreement on some sort of compensation, I will be escalating this to PMSA and failing a result there, the motor industry ombudsman.
His response:
The admission you refer to made by John relates to the procedure not followed by the Peugeot SA staff in the parts warehouse, not here at this dealership.
We abide to the code of conduct and rulings made by the Ombudsman.
I will not be making any offer of compensation and suggest you take this issue up with the Ombudsman. The fact remains that you of your own free will purchased another vehicle before any other issues or a decision by your insurance company had been finalized.
So thats it? A polite fsk off. Imo he is hoping the the bureaucracy will protect the clear incompetence of his organisation.
So I say:
Not even a token? Or an apology? Sad.
What has happened to the level of service where the dealer principal does not have the gonads to take responsibility for slack service in his organisation?
It is because of this kind of slack careless attitude that the consumer protection act has to be implemented.
I must have pressed a button because he replied within 10 minuets with this:
To be perfectly honest with you, I do not appreciate the tone of your mail or what you are implying. You obviously have not read or fail to understand all the e-mails below, if you did it becomes clear that we have had to rely on Peugeot SA to try and assist you, no fault of this dealership at all.
Furthermore, you try to hold us responsible and liable for a decision made entirely on your own with regard the purchasing of another vehicle and then demand compensation!!!!!!!
I will no longer be entering into any correspondence with yourself, will wait for whatever route you decide to take and will liase directly with the other parties. I will not lower myself and trade insults with you no matter how tempting this may be.
Anyway, I don't actually care who screwed up. They are the people I was dealing with and for them to try and pass the buck on to PMSA is PISS POOR.
The DP should have contacted his counterpart at PMSA and said "Between us there was a screw up, how can we fix it". I am not expecting them to pay the R38000 rand for my car. I am expecting them to come to the party and offer some kind of compensation. Even if I'm not quite sure what that is.
What do you think is a fair compensation? R200 a day for the unnecessary delay?
Anyway, so the next step is PMSA customer care. Lets see where that takes us....