South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
It's taken them over a year to do our suburb. It's a very slow process. Think of the logistics.
My question is, when are they going to start doing the load limiting. We have had our meter for 1 month now but they havent done it.
Well, if my area is not scheduled for load shedding, then I would expect the fscking power to be on and to be able to live my life normally using the service I pay for! If my area IS scheduled for load shedding, I'd make a plan for food and fire up the generator for everything else.
Who else will carry the expense?+1
Its surprising that council doesn't see the effects of constantly turning things on and off, they've all got a lot of goodies that are going to need replacing, and hopefully not at the tax payers expense
Well, happened to us again last night. I'm gonna assume there's something wrong with a lot of the meters because you either have power or no power for the entire duration of the "emergency period."
The power dropped the first time so I switched everything off except the stove and a light as we were cooking. No matter what, the power cycled every 15 seconds or so for about 2 minutes. Even 1 light was apparently too much for the new system
Only at 10:00pm did the power come back on and not go off at all.
They might think that they are load limiting, but for a lot of households in our neighborhood, its permanent load-shedding during the emergency period.
Do you have a CIU for your meter? And did you check what your usage was?
For once I am so glad that my power comes directly from Eskom. My heart bleeds for those who face 30 second electricity drops 15 times in 5 minutes - surely this can not be good for any equipment.
Eskom / City Power should really continue with the LED light roll-out - this was a great campaign and dropped consumption dramatically. I rather have no electricity than my equipment power-cycling every 30 seconds - not an issue for all computer kit as it is on UPS, but this can't be good for things like fridges/freezers etc.
For once I am so glad that my power comes directly from Eskom. My heart bleeds for those who face 30 second electricity drops 15 times in 5 minutes - surely this can not be good for any equipment.
Eskom / City Power should really continue with the LED light roll-out - this was a great campaign and dropped consumption dramatically. I rather have no electricity than my equipment power-cycling every 30 seconds - not an issue for all computer kit as it is on UPS, but this can't be good for things like fridges/freezers etc.
The article states that your lights will go out, I wonder if they hook the meter's warning up to your light breakers on your DB board, or just your main breaker![]()
The article states that your lights will go out, I wonder if they hook the meter's warning up to your light breakers on your DB board, or just your main breaker![]()
Lights = electricity. A co-worker told me, that last night he watched how the load-limiting worked and his house turned into a "disco" with power dropping every 30 seconds. A true joke the way this is done as it will destroy plenty of equipment or reduce the lifetime of electronics with COJ not being accountable for it.
I am wondering what the legal aspects are. Surely users must have received a change of TOS or had to sign something as part of this change or is this just done without consulting with customers?
Can't believe that people can be so stupid.
It's the cANCer. They are.
Last September public protector Thuli Madonsela upheld a claim of R18 000 by a Cape Town woman against the City of Cape Town. Her household appliances were destroyed during a power failure caused by cable theft.
The woman had claimed that in early 2011, several appliances, including a laptop, a phone charger, a fridge, a microwave oven, a telephone charger, a washing machine, and an energy saving light bulb were either destroyed or damaged as a result of an electrical power surge.
The city’s insurance department had rejected her claim.
The City of Cape Town said since it had “no control” over criminal activities, it could not be held accountable for negligence and therefore was not liable for the damage.
But Mandonsela found that the failure to maintain the sub-station amounted to maladministration.
She said that because such acts were a common occurrence in the area it was something the council could and should have foreseen and addressed.