Continental vs Pirelli

Beetman

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2007
Messages
748
Howdy

I need to replace 2 of the tyres on my '99 model A6 2.4 front wheel drive.
I currently have 4 Michelins of which 2 have to be replaced.

I have gotten qoutes for Pirelli at R885 per tyre fully fitted and Continental for 878 fully fitted, size 205 55 16.

What would you guys recommend?

I plan to on Saturday replace 2 of the Michelins, move the 2 that have some tread left to the rear and put 2 new tyres in front.
 

LCBXX

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 11, 2006
Messages
19,421
If it's made from rubber, round, fits my rims, lasts long and is branded with a commonly-found name (Dunlop, Bridgestone, Michelin, etc), I'll buy the cheapest I find.
 
Last edited:

gifs

Expert Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2007
Messages
1,478
I would go with the Continentals, just because I like Continental and they are R7 cheaper.
 

JK8

Banned
Joined
Jan 18, 2006
Messages
14,105
I would stick with the Michellins if they lasted or if you had a decent run with them...
Otherwise Contis, Pirellis are soft compound they dont last that long...
I paid R1200 for 205/45/16 Contis:(
 

Shred

Expert Member
Company Rep
Joined
Jul 12, 2006
Messages
1,736
I would stick with Michelins. Conti's are hard, but last long. Pirellis are very soft. But I think Michelins are the best of both worlds IMO.
 

Beetman

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2007
Messages
748
The best price I can get for Michelins so far is R1145, which i think is a bit expensive compared to the contis and pirellis available to me.
 

gifs

Expert Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2007
Messages
1,478
I would stick with Michelins. Conti's are hard, but last long. Pirellis are very soft. But I think Michelins are the best of both worlds IMO.

Depends which Contis.

The Sportcontact Conti are softer but don't last as long.
 

Sensorei

Executive Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2008
Messages
6,797
I changed my Contis sports on my mk5 2 months ago for Pirelli P-Zero Rosso's and I am stoked. The Pirellis are quieter and just generally feel better than the contis did when I got them. Lamborghinis come with Pirelli Rossos for a reason! Go Pirelli.
 

Beetman

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2007
Messages
748
got another qoute for Michelins now for R1300, so clearly it seems like they are going to be way out of my range....

Anyone have any thoughts on Dunlop tyres? Can get the Dunlop 660 for R820.
Would you guys say a should rather go with the Conti or Pirelli for R60 more per tyre?
 

Keeper

Honorary Master
Joined
Mar 29, 2008
Messages
23,624
you guys saying pirelli's are soft?

sheesh I thought they were pretty long lasting compared to my bridgestones!

im happy with pirelli's but it seems the conti's are the way to go
 

superskully

Expert Member
Joined
Aug 11, 2009
Messages
2,606
Make sure they imported tyres and not the locally made.
The contis local are crap. 16" on Moms A-class lasted 20 000km.
Compared to my A3 2.0T, 17" contis lasted me 60 000kms (although i do a lot of highway driving, but still for a 147kw front wheel drive).
Even my wifes Getz (some korean or jap make) is lasting longer than the locally made contis.
I also balance, rotate and align often, which means i usually have to replace all 4.
 

Beetman

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2007
Messages
748
lol, just to add another one to the equation, just found out that i can get Firestone ER300 for R790

I had Firestone's on my old citigolf and used to be very happy with them, but not sure how good there bigger tyres are?
 

JK8

Banned
Joined
Jan 18, 2006
Messages
14,105
I still think if your Michellins lasted ten years, just stick with them....
R600 extra for another 10 years piece of mind...
 

HapticSimian

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 22, 2007
Messages
15,950
Whatever brand you get, keep the new tyres on the rear. FWD or RWD is immaterial - if you lose grip in front, the car understeers... no biggie. Lose grip at the rear & it's arse-first into the nearest hedge.
 

Beetman

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2007
Messages
748
I still think if your Michellins lasted ten years, just stick with them....
R600 extra for another 10 years piece of mind...

hehehe, i wish they had lasted 10 years.....
these were fitted by the previous owner, think that was about 40k km ago, reason i have to replace to is that they have worn unevenly (damn skipped 6 monthly wheel alignment check :mad:)
 

Beetman

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2007
Messages
748
Whatever brand you get, keep the new tyres on the rear. FWD or RWD is immaterial - if you lose grip in front, the car understeers... no biggie. Lose grip at the rear & it's arse-first into the nearest hedge.

eish, was just thinking that due to most of the waring being in front if i put the older pair in front i'm going to have to replace them in 10/20k km's while if i put them at the back they will last quiete a bit longer.....

but now you have me wondering....
 

HapticSimian

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 22, 2007
Messages
15,950
eish, was just thinking that due to most of the waring being in front if i put the older pair in front i'm going to have to replace them in 10/20k km's while if i put them at the back they will last quiete a bit longer.....

but now you have me wondering....

You can get away with it, as you do have a valid concern with wear, but I don't want to be on a wet road with slicks at the back! :eek: Your fronts wear faster because they do the majority of the work - I'd want them best equipped for the task at hand.
 
Last edited:
Top