criminals will continue to get convicted at a rate of 6% or something crazy, and the rest of us will continue to die daily.
Yeah, that is all better now. all fixed. all is well again in lalaland
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
criminals will continue to get convicted at a rate of 6% or something crazy, and the rest of us will continue to die daily.
The video is a little disturbing in regards to the actions of the criminal (firing at police) and the police. Was the police's actions justified up until the point the gun of the suspect is out of reach? probably. After that point I think is where the concern should be especially since the final shot appears to be an execution. Surely the police should've removed the gun from reach, subdued the criminal who was clearly immobilized and handcuffed him etc? I think anyone who's been a victim of violent crime would have no sympathy for the criminal however police are not executioners nor was the final shot warranted or necessary under the circumstances.
Lots of tax payers money was saved on medical, court and jail.
When the cops behave as executioners and not cops we should all be worried.
When the police throw the rule of law and justice out the window then we'd better be worried, because no one is safe when they become a law unto themselves
Definitely overkill by the cops but given the amount of cop killings happening at the moment, as well as the fact that this animal fired at the cops earlier, I don't blame the cop.
Adrenaline must've been very high knowing that he could've been dead just like one his many colleagues in 2015.
Lots of tax payers money was saved on medical, court and jail.
These 2 points are the crux of the matter.
The police became a law unto themselves and violated the rights of a person living in this country, criminal or not. Sure, shoot back at the guy because he attempted to take your life, but to execute him? That's murder in cold blood. Justice needs to be served on that constable.
Armed means it's in your hand, not lying in the grass out of reach.Watch the Facebook vid clip, the suspect was definitely armed when cop shot him. The reporter's narrative is somewhat inaccurate.
A lot of tax money is now going to be used against the cops, probably more than what otherwise would have been. But I get your point though.
The media have sensationalized it by not showing the full video and the threat this man posed. Already took a few bullets to stop him from firing further shots they just needed to finish him off.
Open and shut case against a probable cop killer so not much will be spent.
Irresponsible of the media to use the term "criminal" in the title and then omit to mention the deceased was previously found guilty in a court of law. Perpetrator is more appropriate.
Maybe the deceased has a criminal record but it wasn't mentioned in the article.Not sure I follow your semantics.
Edit. Oh you mean he's not a criminal since he's not been found guilty of anything.
It doesn't matter, he was unarmed & executed.
Said Burger: "It is clear that this suspect no longer posed a threat of serious violence to the arrester or any other person. The moment that qualification falls away, it means the use of deadly force must stop immediately."
Burger said that in terms of police conduct regulations, the officers at the scene at Harvey Street appeared to be guilty of four infractions:
- Shooting a suspect who does not pose a threat of harm;
- Kicking and assaulting a suspect who does not pose a threat;
- Watching and not stopping their colleague from shooting a suspect who did not pose any danger; and
- Failing to offer medical assistance to the injured suspect.