Cops caught on camera 'executing' criminal (WARNING: GRAPHIC CONTENT)

Keep jumping for the criminals it leads a good message to the police when they say they aren't going to put their lives on the line now because they just get persecuted and prosecuted you keyboard warriors make me laugh.
 
darkknightlives said:
Cops get executed for being cops why don't you support them instead of criminals?
Click to expand...
I do support them, I don't support them killing whoever they feel like, when they feel like. Our laws give guidelines on when police can use force or deadly force. Shooting an un-armed and injured man in the head is not legal.

The cops that are killed on or off duty is a terrible and tragic thing, but that doesn't give them the right to execute who they feel like.
 
Pox said:
I do support them, I don't support them killing whoever they feel like, when they feel like. Our laws give guidelines on when police can use force or deadly force. Shooting an un-armed and injured man in the head is not legal.

The cops that are killed on or off duty is a terrible and tragic thing, but that doesn't give them the right to execute who they feel like.
Click to expand...

They weren't killing whoever they felt like whenever, they were killing a criminal who was committing a crime and then shot at them. Don't act like they killed a person who was strolling down the road minding his own business?

was it wrong what they did? meh yes, but they did the world a favour so i couldn't care less.
 
D3x! said:
They weren't killing whoever they felt like whenever, they were killing a criminal who was committing a crime and then shot at them. Don't act like they killed a person who was strolling down the road minding his own business?

was it wrong what they did? meh yes, but they did the world a favour so i couldn't care less.
Click to expand...

Yes they shot him while he was trying to escape, that part I don't have a problem with. If he had died from those injuries then there would have been much less noise. One less criminal to worry about.

But that's not how he died.

After being shot, he was lying on the ground without his weapon. The cops should have either left him to die or should have arrested him.
Instead they kicked him, waited a bit, then shot him in the head. That last part is murder. That's what we have a problem with.

The cops decided it was easier to murder someone than to arrest them.
 
Pox said:
Yes they shot him while he was trying to escape, that part I don't have a problem with. If he had died from those injuries then there would have been much less noise. One less criminal to worry about.

But that's not how he died.

After being shot, he was lying on the ground without his weapon. The cops should have either left him to die or should have arrested him.
Instead they kicked him, waited a bit, then shot him in the head. That last part is murder. That's what we have a problem with.

The cops decided it was easier to murder someone than to arrest them.
Click to expand...

and you have a problem with the murdering of dangerous criminals?
 
D3x! said:
and you have a problem with the murdering of dangerous criminals?
Click to expand...

Yes. I have a problem with all murders. You apparently do not.

In this case the criminal was no longer a danger. They kicked him rather than move his dropped gun further away, that is a non-dangerous criminal, who was then shot in the head. That is a murder, not an attempted arrest or stopping of a dangerous criminal. Murderers need to be tried in a court.
 
Pox said:
Yes. I have a problem with all murders. You apparently do not.

In this case the criminal was no longer a danger. They kicked him rather than move his dropped gun further away, that is a non-dangerous criminal, who was then shot in the head. That is a murder, not an attempted arrest or stopping of a dangerous criminal. Murderers need to be tried in a court.
Click to expand...

he is still a danger, he would have been out in no time. that and a burden on tax payers. I have no problem with the murder of dangerous criminals, in fact i encourage it.
 
D3x! said:
he is still a danger, he would have been out in no time. that and a burden on tax payers. I have no problem with the murder of dangerous criminals, in fact i encourage it.
Click to expand...

Are you willing to give up your own liberties in order to support that?
 
D3x! said:
he is still a danger, he would have been out in no time. that and a burden on tax payers. I have no problem with the murder of dangerous criminals, in fact i encourage it.
Click to expand...

How was he a danger? Except as a danger to messing up the pavement with his bleeding all over it?
The failure of our courts and prisons does not give you the right to execute anyone.

The fact that you encourage murder is.... actually I am done with trying to discuss this with you. You are either insane or a troll. Either way, ciao.

Encouraging murder...gg... end of society.
 
Pox said:
Encouraging murder...gg... end of society.
Click to expand...

One would think allowing violent criminals to roam free would be more likely to 'end society' than themselves being murdered by cops :erm:
 
Last edited:
Alan said:
One would think allowing violent criminals allowed to roam free would be more likely to 'end society' than themselves being murdered by cops :erm:
Click to expand...

And yet no one is defending letting violent criminals roam free.

Oh wait, some are... Cops who murder people are violent criminals themselves, so defending the practice and arguing that they shouldn't be prosecuted for it is advocating letting violent criminals roam free.
 
OrbitalDawn said:
And yet no one is defending letting violent criminals roam free.
Click to expand...

yet that is exactly what is happening. Everybody knows that criminal would be walking the streets free to commit violent crime in the near future had he been arrested. That's the reality and that's your alternative.


This quote sums up the logic. Criminals can run free so long as I'm not seen to be condoning actions like that of the cop.

When purity leftists do actions and organising, their interest is not in reducing oppression as much as it is in reducing their own participation in it. Above all else, they want to be able to say that they are not oppressing, not that oppression has ended.”
Click to expand...

Matt Bruenig
 
Last edited:
Alan said:
yet that is exactly what is happening. Everybody knows that criminal would be walking the streets free to commit violent crime in the near future had he been arrested. That's the reality and that's your alternative.
Click to expand...

Nope. We're saying we shouldn't have more violent criminals roaming around free, only this time with a badge and authority on their side.
 
OrbitalDawn said:
Nope. We're saying we shouldn't have more violent criminals roaming around free, only this time with a badge and authority on their side.
Click to expand...

even so he is less criminal than the criminal as the crime he committed was towards a criminal. Lesser of 2 evils.
 
OrbitalDawn said:
Nope. We're saying we shouldn't have more violent criminals roaming around free, only this time with a badge and authority on their side.
Click to expand...

Yeah more dead violent criminals means more crime! Others can differentiate between killing a violent criminal that shot at you compared to killing an innocent citizen for his shoes.

Lets see how your maths adds up. One more violent criminal with the cop minus on dead violent criminal. :erm:

With your alternative though you can add all the innocent people that would no doubt be victims of that perp's crimes in the future had he gone to prison only to be released soon after.
 
Alan said:
Yeah more dead violent criminals means more crime! Others can differentiate between killing a violent criminal that shot at you compared to killing an innocent citizen for his shoes.

Lets see how your maths adds up. One more violent criminal with the cop minus on dead violent criminal. :erm:

With your alternative though you can add all the innocent people that would no doubt be victims of that perp's crimes in the future had he gone to prison only to be released soon after.
Click to expand...

You're assuming non violent criminals will be treated any differently. IPID has a stack of cases of that happening.
 
Fudzy said:
You're assuming non violent criminals will be treated any differently. IPID has a stack of cases of that happening.
Click to expand...

so because the cop shot and killed someone who tried to kill them he would likewise shoot a child for shoplifting a sucker?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X